情绪面孔认知研究方法综述
A Review of the Research Methods of Emotional Face Cognition
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2019.91002, PDF,   
作者: 肖明岳:西南大学心理学部,重庆
关键词: 面孔情绪认知偏向情绪判断Face Emotion Cognitive Bias Emotion Judgment
摘要: 情绪识别是人们日常生活中一项重要的活动,对人际交往、情绪调节等行为都有着深远的意义。本研究将综述情绪面孔认知的研究方法,主要包括:情绪面孔数据库、情绪面孔识别任务两部分。其中,情绪面孔的数据库包含真实面孔和抽象面孔两部分;而情绪面孔识别任务包括用于测量认知偏向的矛盾情绪任务(模糊面孔识别任务)和用于测量情绪识别能力的面部表情识别任务(清晰面孔识别任务)。最后,本文对以往的研究进行了总结,并据此对今后的研究者提出了一些建议。
Abstract: Emotional recognition is an important activity in people’s daily life. It has far-reaching significance for interpersonal communication and emotional adjustment. This study will review the research methods of emotional face recognition, including: emotional face database, emotional face recognition task. The database of emotional faces includes two parts: a real face and an abstract face; and the emotional face recognition task includes a contradictory emotional task for measuring cognitive bias (fuzzy face recognition task) and a facial expression recognition task for measuring emotional recognition ability (clear face recognition task). Finally, this paper summarizes the previous research and makes some suggestions for future researchers.
文章引用:肖明岳 (2019). 情绪面孔认知研究方法综述. 心理学进展, 9(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2019.91002

参考文献

[1] Bucks, R. S., Garner, M., Tarrant, L., Bradley, B. P., & Mogg, K. (2008). Interpretation of Emotionally Ambiguous Faces in Older Adults. Journals of Gerontology, 63, 337-343.[CrossRef
[2] Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1976). Measuring Facial Movement. Environmental Psychology & Nonverbal Behavior, 1, 56-75.[CrossRef
[3] Knyazev, G. G., Bocharov, A. V., & Slobodskoj-Plusnin, J. Y. (2009). Hostility- and Gender-Related Differences in Oscillatory Responses to Emotional Facial Expressions. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 502-513.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Langner, O., Dotsch, R., Bijlstra, G., Wigboldus, D. H. J., Hawk, S. T. et al. (2010). Presentation and Validation of the Radboud Faces Database. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1377-1388.[CrossRef
[5] Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2005). Attentional Bias in Generalized Anxiety Disorder versus Depressive Disorder. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 29, 29-45.[CrossRef
[6] Sasson, N. J., Pinkham, A. E., Richard, J., Hughett, P., Gur, R. E. et al. (2010). Controlling for Response Biases Clarifies Sex and Age Differences in Facial Affect Recognition. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34, 207-221.
[7] Schönenberg, M., & Jusyte, A. (2014). Investigation of the Hostile Attribution Bias toward Ambiguous Facial Cues in Antisocial Violent Offenders. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 264, 61-69.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Suzuki, A., & Akiyama, H. (2013). Cognitive Aging Explains Age-Related Differences in Face-Based Recognition of Basic Emotions Except for Anger and Disgust. Neuropsychology Development & Cognition, 20, 253-270.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Wilkowski, B. M., & Robinson, M. D. (2012). When Aggressive Individuals See the World More Accurately: The Case of Perceptual Sensitivity to Subtle Facial Expressions of Anger. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 540-553.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Yao, S., Ding, C., Qi, S., & Yang, D. (2014). Value Associations of Emotional Faces Can Modify the Anger Superiority Effect: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 849-856.[CrossRef] [PubMed]