心理健康概念的跨文化意义探析
Cross-Cultural Ethical Significance of Psychological Therapy
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2019.91019, PDF,    国家科技经费支持
作者: 李 璐：云南师范大学文理学院，云南 昆明；王啸天：华东政法大学心理健康中心，上海；蒋 柯：温州医科大学精神医学院，浙江 温州
关键词: 心理健康；少数民族；跨文化；范式；测量等值性；Mental Health； Ethnic Minorities； Cross-Cultural； Paradigm； The Equivalence of Cross-Cultural Psychological Measurement
摘要: 民族文化的多样性与共同性特征，使得基于不同民族文化的心理健康概念也具有了多重交互含义。本文从跨文化心理测量的等值性出发，论证了少数民族心理健康理论和实践的主要困难在于“健康”概念的文化意义界定。文章认为，在进行跨文化的心理健康评估时，研究者必须要在文化范式的层面上进行。为了避免以一种文化范式去对另一种文化范式做出价值评价的文化伦理悖论，少数民族心理健康研究的未来取向，是建构一个适合于跨文化交流的语境和公共意义平台。
Abstract: Due to the diversity and commonality of national cultures, the concept of mental health based on different national cultures has multiple interactive meanings. Starting from the equivalence of cross-cultural psychological measurement, this paper demonstrates that the main difficulty in the theory and practice of minority mental health lies in the definition and the cultural significance of the concept of “health”. The paper argues that when conducting cross-cultural mental health assessment, researchers must conduct it on the level of cultural paradigm. In order to avoid the cultural ethics paradox that one cultural paradigm evaluates the value of another, the future orientation of minority mental health research is to construct a context and publicly significant platform suitable for cross-cultural communication.
文章引用：李璐, 王啸天, 蒋柯 (2019). 心理健康概念的跨文化意义探析. 心理学进展, 9(1), 146-152. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2019.91019

参考文献

[1] 蔡华(2006). 凉山彝族嫫尼现状调查. 民族研究, (6), 45-52.
[2] 蒋柯, 张凌雁(2015). 实验民族心理学的理论建构论纲(一). 西南民族大学学报(社会科学版), 36(3), 94-100.
[3] 库恩(2004). 科学革命的结构. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[4] 黎黑(蒋柯等译) (2013). 心理学史. 上海: 上海人民出版社.
[5] 李凌, 蒋柯(2008). 健康心理学. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
[6] 罗鸣春, 黄希庭, 苏丹(2010). 中国少数民族心理健康研究30年文献计量分析. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 36(3), 17-20.
[7] 蒋柯(2011). 透过归纳问题阅读解释阶梯的认识建构功能. 自然辩证法研究, 27(5), 1-6.
[8] 万明钢, 刘显翠, 杨亚琼(2007). 民族与文化视野中的心理健康研究. 民族教育研究, 18(3), 10-14.
[9] Andrich, D., Sheridan, B., & Luo, G. (2010). Rasch Models for Measurement: RUMM2030. Perth: RUMM Pty Ltd.
[10] Boer, D. et al. (2018). On Detecting Systematic Measurement Error in Cross-Cultural Research: A Review and Critical Reflection on Equivalence and Invariance Tests. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49, 713-734.[CrossRef] 
[11] Chong, M. Y., & Wilkinson, G. (1989). Validation of 30- and 12-Item Versions of the Chinese Health Questionnaire (CHQ) in Patients Admitted for General Health Screening. Psy-chological Medicine, 19, 495-505.[CrossRef] 
[12] Christopher, W. W., Tay, L., Su, R., & Diener, E. (2018). Measuring Thriving across Nations: Examining the Measurement Equivalence of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT) and the Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT). Applied Psephology: Health and Well-Being, 3, 135-160.
[13] Diener, E., & Seligman, M. (2002).Very Happy People. Psychological Science, 13, 81-84.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Diener, S., & Eunkook, E. (2000). Culture and Subjective Well-Being. A Bradford Book. p. 4.
[15] Gibbons, C. J., Skevington, S. M., WHOQOL Group (2018). Adjusting for Cross-Cultural Differences in Computer-Adaptive Tests of Quality of Life. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1027-1039.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Gerber, B., Smith Jr., E. V., Girotti, M., Pelaez, L., Lawless, K., Smolin, L. et al. (2002). Using Rasch Measurement to Investigate Cross-Form Equivalence and Clinical Utility of Spanish and English Versions of a Diabetes Questionnaire: A Pilot Study. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3, 243-271.
[17] Leong, F. T. L., Leung, K., & Cheung, F. M. (2010). Integrating Cross-Cultural Psychology Research Methods into Ethnic Minority Psychology. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16, 590-597.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Trimble, J. E. (2007). Cultural Measurement Equivalence. In C. S. Clauss-Ehlers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Cross-Cultural School Psychology. New York: Springer.