以物抵债的法律效力研究
The Legal Validity Research of Repossessed Assets
摘要:
担保是法律规定或当事人约定的保证债务履行的方法和手段。随着近十年来的经济发展和交易方式多元化,反映在法律上的则是新担保方式的不断出现。“名为买卖,实为担保”的以物抵债等新型担保方式逐渐频繁地被用于现代经济交易中。由于最高院与部分省高院出台的相互矛盾的司法指导文件,导致各地方法院对于此类案件的处理各不相同,甚至时常发生同案不同判的情况。作者将通过对比观察中外传统与新型的担保形式、同案不同判的案例和司法指导文件,对担保制度中存在的强制性规定加以归纳,进而论证上述的以物抵债行为的效力认定问题及法律性质,以求最大程度上保护私法的意思自治及合同自由原则,使法律真正起到稳定社会经济交易秩序的作用。
Abstract:
Guarantee is the method of guaranteeing the performance of debt stipulated by law or agreed by the parties. With the development of economy and the diversification of trading modes in recent ten years, new guarantee modes are constantly emerging in law. New types of guarantee, such as “called sales contract, actually guaranteeing” which is named as paying the debt by a thing, are increasingly used in modern economic transactions. Because of the contradictory judicial guidance documents issued by the Supreme Court and some provincial high courts, the handling of such cases by the local courts is different, and even different judgments of the same case often occur. By comparing and observing Chinese and foreign traditional and new forms of guarantee, cases of different judgments in the same cases and judicial guidance documents, the author summarizes the mandatory provisions in the guarantee system, and then demonstrates the validity identification and legal nature of the above-mentioned debt-in-kind behavior in order to protect the meaning of private law to the greatest extent. The principle of autonomy and freedom of contract makes the law really play a role in stabilizing the order of social and economic transactions.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
“江苏省高级人民法院关于审理以物抵债的若干法律适用问题的审理纪要”第2条[Z]. 2014.
|
|
[2]
|
“北京高院关于审理房屋买卖合同纠纷案件若干疑难问题的会议纪要”第25条[Z]. 2014.
|
|
[3]
|
“最高人民法院关于审理民间借贷案件适用法律若干问题的规定”第24条第1款[Z]. 2015.
|
|
[4]
|
陈永强. 以买卖合同担保借贷的解释路径与法效果[J]. 中国法学, 2018(2): 228-247.
|
|
[5]
|
最高人民法院(2011)民提字第344号[Z]. 2011.
|
|
[6]
|
山东省高级人民法院(2015)鲁民一终字第381号[Z]. 2015.
|
|
[7]
|
孙鹏, 王勤劳, 范雪飞. 担保物权法原理[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2009: 87-94.
|
|
[8]
|
近江幸治. 担保物权法[M]. 祝娅, 王卫军, 房兆融, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2000: 102-110.
|
|
[9]
|
许明月. 英美担保法要论[M]. 重庆: 重庆出版社, 1998: 55-59.
|
|
[10]
|
吴从周. 附买回条件之契约[J]. 法学教室民法(台湾大学), 2013(7): 129.
|
|
[11]
|
费安玲. 比较担保法——以德国、法国、瑞士、意大利、英国和中国担保法为研究对象[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2004: 166-170.
|
|
[12]
|
徐海燕. 英美担保法[M]. 北京: 对外经济贸易大学出版社, 2012: 148-150.
|
|
[13]
|
盖尤斯. 法学阶梯[M]. 黄风, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2008: 188.
|