论不真正不作为犯与罪刑法定原则的冲突
On the Conflict between Crime of Omission and Principle of Legality
摘要: 在不作为犯的认定及处罚中,对于不真正不作为犯的处罚由于并无法律明文规定之依据,故常有违背罪刑法定原则之嫌。本文试在对不真正不作为犯进行基本问题梳理后,与罪刑法定原则的具体要求较之衡量,以追求在刑法教义学的视角下明确不真正不作为犯的处罚依据与具体基准,从而缓和罪刑法定原则与不真正不作为犯的冲突困境。
Abstract:
In the determination and punishment of an innocent offender, the punishment for an innocent offender does not have a clear legal basis, so it is often suspected that it violates the legal principle of criminal punishment. This article tries to sort out the basic problems of innocent offenders, and compares them with the specific requirements of the legal principles of criminal punishment. In the pursuit of criminal law doctrine, it seeks to clarify the punishment basis and specific benchmarks of innocent offenders, thereby mitigating the crime, the conflict between legal principles and inaction.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
陈忠槐. “论我国刑法中的不作为犯罪”, 载中国法学会刑法学研究会组织编写:《全国刑法论文荟萃(1981届-1988届)》[M]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学出版社, 1989.
|
|
[2]
|
徐久生, 庄敬华, 译. 德国刑法典[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2000.
|
|
[3]
|
许玉秀. 当代刑法思潮[M]. 北京: 中国民主法制出版社, 2005.
|
|
[4]
|
刘士心. 不纯正不作为犯研究[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2008.
|
|
[5]
|
路冲. 不纯正不作为犯的等价性问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2016.
|
|
[6]
|
黎宏. 不作为犯研究[M]. 湖北: 武汉大学出版社, 1997.
|
|
[7]
|
张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2011.
|
|
[8]
|
许玉秀. 不纯正不作为犯之研究[M]. 台北: 台湾政治大学法律研究所, 1980.
|