唐明律法官员贪赃罪责比较研究
A Comparative Study on the Crime of Corruption of Officials in the Tang Code and Law of Ming Dynasty
摘要: 《唐律疏议》作为我国古代封建法典的典型代表，首次建立了完善的惩治官员贪赃的法律体系。此后，后世基本沿用唐律中关于官员赃罪的规定，直至明朝，统治者对官员赃罪的名称、内容等进行了相应的调整，并为清朝所沿袭。对唐明律中官员贪赃罪责进行比较研究，有助于厘清唐以后各代对于官吏贪赃处罚的演变轨迹，为社会主义廉政建设提供历史借鉴。
Abstract:
As a typical representative of China’s ancient feudal code, Tang code established a perfect legal system to punish officials for corruption and bribe for the first time. Since then, the later generations basically followed the provisions of the Tang code on the crime of officials’ corruption. Until the Ming dynasty, the rulers adjusted the name and content of the crime of officials’ corruption and bribe, which was followed by the Qing dynasty. A comparative study of the corruption of officials in the laws of Tang and Ming dynasty is helpful to clarify the evolution of the corruption punishment of officials in the later generations of Tang dynasty and provide historical reference for the construction of socialist clean government.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
[清]张廷玉, 等. 明史∙卷九十三志第六十九[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1974.
|
|
[2]
|
[唐]长孙无忌, 等. 唐律疏议∙卷第四[M]. 岳纯之, 点校. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2013.
|
|
[3]
|
[唐]长孙无忌, 等. 唐律疏议∙卷第十九[M]. 岳纯之, 点校. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2013.
|
|
[4]
|
[明]刘惟谦, 等. 大明律∙卷一[M]. 项怀锋, 等, 点校. 北京: 法律出版社, 1999.
|
|
[5]
|
[明]刘惟谦, 等. 大明律∙卷十八[M]. 项怀锋, 等, 点校. 北京: 法律出版社, 1999.
|
|
[6]
|
[唐]长孙无忌, 等. 唐律疏议∙卷第十五[M]. 岳纯之, 点校. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2013.
|
|
[7]
|
[明]刘惟谦, 等. 大明律∙卷七[M]. 项怀锋, 等, 点校. 北京: 法律出版社, 1999.
|
|
[8]
|
[唐]长孙无忌, 等. 唐律疏议∙卷第十一[M]. 岳纯之, 点校. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2013.
|
|
[9]
|
[明]刘惟谦, 等. 大明律∙卷二十三[M]. 项怀锋, 等, 点校. 北京: 法律出版社, 1999.
|
|
[10]
|
[唐]长孙无忌, 等. 唐律疏议∙卷第二十六[M]. 岳纯之, 点校. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2013.
|