不同人际依恋类型在人际环状模型中的描述研究
The Analysis of Attachment Styles through Interpersonal Circumplex Descriptions
摘要: 通过实验设计合作和竞争两个任务以考察不同依恋类型的男女配对被试在Leary的人际环状模型中的分布情况，基于研究的结果可以得到三点结论：1) 不同依恋类型的个体在人际互动中表现出不同的人际风格倾向；2) 不同依恋类型的个体在人际环状模型中所占据的区域不同，依恋类型应为连续性而非离散型；3) 不同依恋类型的男女配对在两个任务下的配合满意度不同，其中双方都是安全型依恋的配对在两个任务中的满意度均为最高，双方均是不安全依恋类型的配对在合作任务中满意度最低，但是在竞争任务中则跟只有一方是不安全依恋的配对无显著区别。
Abstract: The study explored how the dyads with different attachment styles behavior towards Leary’s cir- cumplex in cooperative and competitive tasks. There are three conclusions based on the results of this study can be showed that: 1) Individuals of different attachment styles in interpersonal interaction had shown di- fferent trend of interpersonal styles; 2) Individuals of different attachment styles take up different area in interpersonal circumplex, which proves that it is continuous not discrete of interpersonal attachment style; 3) the dyads in different sex of different attachment types showed different satisfaction in these two tasks. In coo- perative task, dyads of secure attachment style took the highest satisfaction, and of insecure attachment style with the lowest one, while in competitive task, it is not distinguished between dyads of insecure attachment style and dyads with only one insecure partner.
文章引用：薛雯, 赵守盈 (2011). 不同人际依恋类型在人际环状模型中的描述研究. 心理学进展, 1(3), 114-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/ap.2011.13017

参考文献

[1] 李同归, 加藤和生(2006). 成人依恋的测量:亲密关系经历量表 (ECR)中文版[J]. 心理学报, 3期, 399-406
[2] 李同归, 王新暖, 郭晓飞(2006). 初中生的依恋类型与异性交往行为[J]. 中国行为医学科学, 7期, 644-646.
[3] 薛雯, 赵守盈, 傅丽萍(2010). 人际特质匹配在人际环状模型中的应用[J]. 湖北成人教育学院学报, 3期, 3-5.
[4] Ansell, E. B., Kurtz, J. E., & Markey, P. M. (2008). Gender differences in interpersonal complementarity within roommate dyads. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 502-512.
[5] Gallo, L. C., et al. (2003). An interpersonal analysis of adult attachment style: circumplex descriptions, recalled developmental experiences, self-representations and interpersonal functioning in adulthood. Jour- nal of Personality, 2, 141-182.
[6] Markey, P. M., Funder, D. C., Ozer, D. J. (2003). Complemen- tarity of interpersonal behaviors in dyadic interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1082-1090.
[7] Mayseless, O., & Scharf, M. (2007). Adolescents’ attachment repre- sentations and their capacity for intimacy in close relationships. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 1, 23-50.
[8] Zimmermann (2004). Attachment representations and characterristics of friendship relations during adolescence. Journal of experimental child psychology, 88, 83-101.