基于熵权的模糊物元模型在河流健康评价中的应用研究
Application of Fuzzy Matter-Element Model Based on Entropy Weight in River Health Assessment
DOI: 10.12677/JWRR.2020.94041, PDF,    国家科技经费支持
作者: Marvin C. Thompson, 张 翔*, 邓梁堃, 徐 晶, 肖 宜:武汉大学水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉;海绵城市建设水系统科学湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉
关键词: 模糊物元法河流健康评价沙颍河Fuzzy Matter-Element Model River Health Assessment Shaying River
摘要: 近年来,河流健康状况受人类发展影响而不断恶化,合理地进行河流健康评价渐渐成为河流管理最重要的部分,但是同时考虑受闸坝高度调控河流的自然和社会两种属性的健康评价工作开展较少。本文从水文、水质、水生态和社会服务四个方面构建了一套新的河流健康综合评价指标体系,并将评价等级分为5个等级,包括I (理想状况)、II (健康)、III (亚健康)、IV (不健康)、V (病态)。选取沙颍河代表性的周口、界首和颍上断面,运用基于熵权的模糊物元模型对这三个断面进行了应用研究。从研究结果可知,三个断面均处于亚健康状况,尽管其健康状况优于IV和V等级,但是仍需持续开展沙颍河的河流管理工作。此外,本文还比较了各个选取指标的重要性并通过设置不同的情景对将河流社会属性纳入指标体系的必要性进行讨论,论证了在河流健康评价中考虑社会服务指标是十分必要的。本文研究成果对于更全面地评价河流健康状态、制订河流健康保护措施具有重要的参考价值。
Abstract: In recent years, the health status of rivers has been deteriorating under the influence of human development, and reasonable river health assessment has gradually become the most important part of river management. However, the health assessment of highly regulated rivers considering both natural and social attributes is rarely carried out. In this paper, a new river health evaluation indicator system is constructed, which integrated four aspects of hydrology, water quality, water ecology and social services. The evaluation grades are divided into five grades, including I (ideal condition), II (health), III (sub-health), IV (unhealth), V (serious illness). The Zhoukou, Jieshou and Yingshang sections at Shaying River are selected to be evaluated using the fuzzy matter-element model based on entropy weight. According to the evaluation results, the three sections are all in sub-health condition. Although they are in better health conditions compared to the rivers in grade IV and V, the river management of Shaying River still needs to be carried out continuously. In addition, it also compares the importance of each selected indicator and discusses the necessity of incorporating the river social attribute into the indicator system by setting different scenarios. It is concluded that it is very necessary to consider the social service indicator. The research results of this paper have important reference values for more comprehensive evaluation of river health status and decision making of river health protection measures.
文章引用:Marvin C.Thompson, 张翔, 邓梁堃, 徐晶, 肖宜. 基于熵权的模糊物元模型在河流健康评价中的应用研究[J]. 水资源研究, 2020, 9(4): 394-402. https://doi.org/10.12677/JWRR.2020.94041

参考文献

[1] SUNDARAY, S. K., PANDA, U. C., NAYAK, B. B., et al. Multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality of the Mahanadi River estuarine system (India): A case study. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2006, 28(4): 317-330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] ZHAO, Y. W., YANG, Z. F. Integra-tive fuzzy hierarchical model for river health assessment: A case study of Yong River in Ningbo City, China. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 2009, 14(4): 1729-1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 秦鹏, 王英华, 王维汉, 等. 河流健康评价的模糊层次与可变模糊集耦合模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2011, 45(12): 2169-2175. QIN Peng, WANG Yinghua, WANG Weihan, et al. Integrated model of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and variable fuzzy set model on evaluating river health system. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2011, 45(12): 2169-2175. (in Chinese)
[4] 崔东文. RBF与GRNN神经网络模型在河流健康评价中的应用——以文山州区域中小河流健康评价为例[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2012(3): 61-66. CUI Dongwen. RBF and GRNN neural network model in the evaluation of river health. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2012(3): 61-66. (in Chinese)
[5] 邓晓军, 翟禄新, 李艺. 基于熵权模糊综合评价模型的桂林市桃花江河流健康评价[J]. 水电能源科学, 2013, 31(11): 35-38. DENG Xiaojun, ZHAI Luxin and LI Yi. Taohuajiang river health evaluation in Guilin city based on entropy weight and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model. Water Resources and Power, 2013, 31(11): 35-38. (in Chinese)
[6] DENG, X., XU, Y., HAN, L., et al. Assessment of river health based on an improved entropy-based fuzzy matter-element model in the Taihu Plain, China. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 57: 85-95.[CrossRef
[7] PAN, G., XU, Y., YU, Z., et al. Analysis of river health variation under the background of urbanization based on entropy weight and matter-element model: A case study in Huzhou City in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Environmental Research, 2015, 139: 31-35.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] KARR, J. R. Defining and measuring river health. Freshwater Biology, 1999, 41: 221-234.[CrossRef
[9] NORRIS, R. H., THOMAS, M. C. What is river health? Freshwa-ter Biology, 1999, 41: 197-209.[CrossRef
[10] ZHANG, J., WANG, K., CHEN, X., et al. Combining a fuzzy mat-ter-element model with a geographic information system in eco-environmental sensitivity and distribution of land use planning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2011, 8(4): 1206-1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 周振民, 常慧. 基于熵权的模糊物元地下水水质评价模型[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2008(12): 45-47. ZHOU Zhenmin, CHANG Hui. Fuzzy matter-element groundwater quality evaluation model based on entropy weight. China Ru-ral Water and Hydropower, 2008(12): 45-47. (in Chinese)
[12] 刘倩, 董增川, 徐伟, 等. 基于模糊物元模型的滦河河流健康评价[J]. 水电能源科学, 2014, 32(9): 47-50. LIU Qian, DONG Zengchuan, XU Wei, et al. Health assessment of Luanhe River based on fuzzy matter-element model. Water Resources and Power, 2014, 32(9): 47-50. (in Chinese)
[13] 孙博. 基于熵权模糊物元模型的河流生态健康综合评价[J]. 人民珠江, 2015, 36(6): 95-100. SUN Bo. River ecosystem health evaluation of fuzzy matter element model based on entropy weight. Pearl River, 2015, 36(6): 95-100. (in Chinese)
[14] STRONG, W. L. Biased richness and evenness relationships within Shannon-Wiener index values. Ecological Indicators, 2016(67): 703-713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 夏军, 石卫. 变化环境下中国水安全问题研究与展望[J]. 水利学报, 2016, 47(3): 292-301. XIA Jun, SHI Wei. Perspective on water security issue of changing environment in China. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2016, 47(3): 292-301. (in Chinese)
[16] 葛金金, 彭文启, 张汶海, 等. 确定河道内适宜生态流量的几种水文学方法——以沙颍河周口段为例[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2019, 17(2): 75-80. GE Jinjin, PENG Wenqi, ZHANG Wenhai, et al. Comparison of several hydrological methods to determine the ecological flow for instream river: A case study of Zhoukou hydrological station in Shaying River. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 2019, 17(2): 75-80. (in Chinese)
[17] ZUO, Q. T., JIN, R. F., MA, J. X., et al. Description and applica-tion of a mathematical method for the analysis of harmony. The Scientific World Journal, 2015, 2015: Article ID: 831396.[CrossRef] [PubMed]