LVIS支架辅助栓塞颅内微小动脉瘤的安全性及疗效分析
Analysis of Safety and Efficacy of LVIS Stent Assisted Embolization for Intracranial Microaneurysm
DOI: 10.12677/MD.2020.103022, PDF, 下载: 429  浏览: 883  科研立项经费支持
作者: 钱晓敏*, 苏 平, 刘博虎, 王 京, 高 鸿, 刘 俊, 岑键昌#:昆明市第一人民医院神经外科,云南 昆明
关键词: 颅内微小动脉瘤LVIS支架预后安全性疗效分析Intracranial Microaneurysm LVIS Stents Prognosis Safety Efficacy Analysis
摘要: 目的:分析使用LVIS支架辅助栓塞颅内微小动脉瘤的安全性和疗效。方法:回顾性分析了2017年1月至2019年12月使用LVIS支架辅助治疗的23例颅内微小动脉瘤患者临床及随访资料,分析术中并发症、手术效果及预后随访情况。结果:23例颅内微小动脉瘤患者均使用LVIS支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞。23例患者共使用LVIS支架25枚,1例患者置入了双支架,1例患者为2枚颅内微小动脉瘤,置入了两枚支架,支架释放成功率达100%。术中动脉瘤破裂出血1例(4.3%),1例患者出现支架内血栓形成(4.3%)。术后即刻造影,Raymond I级栓塞16枚(66.7%),Raymond II级栓塞6枚(25%),Raymond III级栓塞2枚(8.3%),围手术期未再发生脑出血及脑梗死情况;随访3月至1年,所有患者均复查造影,Raymond I级栓塞22枚(91.7%),Raymond II级栓塞2枚(8.3%),所有LVIS支架均展开良好,无支架移位、分支血管闭塞及血管狭窄情况。随访期间患者mRS评分0分21例,mRS评分2分1例,mRS评分3分1例,预后良好率达到96% (mRS评分0~2分)。结论:LVIS支架辅助栓塞颅内微小动脉瘤是安全有效的方法,能提高动脉瘤治愈率,近期治疗效果良好,但要求术者需具备良好的支架应用技巧,远期疗效仍需多中心、大样本及长时间的随访观察。
Abstract: Objective: To analyze the safety and efficacy of LVIS stent assisted embolization for intracranial microaneurysm. Method: Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical and follow-up data of 23 patients with intracranial microaneurysms who underwent LVIS stent assisted embolization from January 2017 to December 2019, and the intraoperative complications, surgical effect and prognosis were analyzed. Result: All the 23 patients with intracranial microaneurysm underwent LVIS assisted coil embolization. Twenty five LVIS stents were used in 23 patients; 1 patient received dual LVIS stent; two stents were implanted in one patient with 2 intracranial microaneurysms. The success rate of stent release was 100%. There was one case of intraoperative aneurysm rupture and hemorrhage (4.3%). One case developed stent thrombosis (4.3%). Immediate postoperative angiography showed that 16 (66.7%) microaneurysms achieved Raymond grade I embolization; 6 (25%) microaneurysms achieved Raymond grade II embolization; 2 (8.3%) microaneurysms achieved Raymond grade III embolization. There was no cerebral hemorrhage and cerebral infarction in perioperative period. The follow-up time was 3 months to 1 year. All patients were reexamined angiography during follow-up. 22 (91.7%) microaneurysms achieved Raymond grade I embolization. 2 (8.3%) microaneurysms achieved Raymond grade II embolization. All LVIS stents were well deployed without stent displacement, branch vessel occlusion and vascular stenosis. During the follow-up period, the mRS score was 0 in 21 cases; the mRS score was 2 in 1 cases; the mRS score was 3 in 1 cases; the favorable prognosis (with the mRS score at 0 - 2) rate reached 96%. Conclusion: LVIS stent assisted embolization for intracranial microaneurysms is a safe and effective method. It can improve the cure rate of aneurysm, and the short-term treatment effect is good, but it is required that the operator should have good stent application skills, and the long-term efficacy still needs multi center, large sample and long term follow-up.
文章引用:钱晓敏, 苏平, 刘博虎, 王京, 高鸿, 刘俊, 岑键昌. LVIS支架辅助栓塞颅内微小动脉瘤的安全性及疗效分析[J]. 医学诊断, 2020, 10(3): 137-145. https://doi.org/10.12677/MD.2020.103022

参考文献

[1] Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigations (1998) Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms—Risk of Rup-ture and Risks of Surgical Intervention. The New England Journal of Medicine, 339, 1725-1733.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199812103392401
[2] Poncyljusz, W., Biliński, P., Safranow, K., et al. (2015) The LVIS/LVIS Jr. Stents in the Treatment of Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysms: Multicentre Registry. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 7, 524-529.
https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011229
[3] 吕光淘, 王海全, 王德明, 黄小龙. LVIS支架辅助栓塞颅内微小动脉瘤的疗效及预后随访分析[J]. 河北医学, 2019, 25(2): 284-287.
[4] 于嘉, 邓剑平, 李江, 张涛, 陈虎, 方伟, 闫忠军, 赵振伟. Lvis支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞颅内微小宽颈动脉瘤[J]. 中华神经外科疾病研究杂志, 2017, 16(4): 301-304.
[5] 陈骅, 苏浩波, 陈亮, 罗良生, 顾建平, 张健. LVIS支架不同释放方式在颅内宽颈动脉瘤中的应用[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2016(2): 82-88.
[6] Raymond, J., Guilbert, F., Weill, A., et al. (2003) Long-Term Angiographic Recurrences after Selective Endovascular Treatment of Aneurysms with Detachable Coils. Stroke, 34, 1398-1403.
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000073841.88563.E9
[7] Brinjikji, W., Lanzino, G., Cloft, H.J., Rabinstein, A. and Kallmes, D.F. (2010) Endovascular Treatment of Very Small (3 mm or Smaller) Intracranial Aneurysms: Report of a Consecutive Series and a Meta-Analysis. Stroke, 41, 116-121.
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.566356
[8] Stetler, W.R., Wilson, T.J., Al-Holou, W.N., Chaudhary, N., et al. (2015) Conventional Endovascular Treatment of Small Intracranial Aneurysms Is Not Associated with Addi-tional Risks Compared with Treatment of Larger Aneurysms. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery, 7, 262-265.
https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011133
[9] Raoul, P., Ziad, A., Dan, M., et al. (2019) Embolization of Very Small (≤ 3 mm) Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Large Single-Center Experience on Treatment of Unrup-tured versus Ruptured Cases. World Neurosurgery, 128, 1087-1095.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.070
[10] Zhang, Y.S., Yang, M., Zhang, H.Q., et al. (2017) Stent-Assisted Coiling May Prevent the Recurrence of Very Small Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Multicenter Study. World Neurosurgery, 100, 22-29.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.107
[11] Brinjikji, W., Lanzino, G., Cloft, H., et al. (2015) Risk Factors for Hemorrhagic Complications Following Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Results from the International Retrospective Study of the Pipeline Embolization Device. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 36, 2308-2313.
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4443
[12] Kallmes, D.F., Hanel, R., Lopes, D., et al. (2015) International Retro-spective Study of the Pipeline Embolization Device: A Multicenter Aneurysm Treatment Study. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 36, 108-115.
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4111
[13] Fiorella, D., Boulos, A., Turk, A.S., et al. (2019) The Safety and Effec-tiveness of the LVIS Stent System for the Treatment of Wide-Necked Cerebral Aneurysms: Final Results of the Pivotal US LVIS Trial. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery, 11, 357-361.
https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014309
[14] 张明铭, 欧阳奕安, 黄昊, 蒋宇钢, 喻孟强. LVIS支架在颅内微小动脉瘤中的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2016, 41(8): 821-825.
[15] 许岗勤, 李天晓, 王子亮, 薛绛宇, 朱良付, 白卫星, 汪勇锋. LVIS支架在辅助栓塞颅内宽颈微小动脉瘤中的应用[J]. 中华神经医学杂志, 2016, 15(8): 810-813.
[16] Wu, P., Ocak, P.E., Wang, D.H., Ocak, U., et al. (2019) Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Tiny Intracranial Aneurysms with Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Device. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 28, 330-337.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.09.052
[17] Zhang, X.G., Zhong, J.J., Gao, H., et al. (2017) Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with the LVIS Device: A Systematic Review. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery, 9, 553-557.
https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012403
[18] King, B., Vaziri, S., Singla, A., et al. (2015) Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes after Stent-Assisted Coiling of Cerebral Aneurysms with Enterprise and Neuroform Stents: A Comparative Analysis of the Literature. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery, 7, 905-909.
https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011457