要素投入、技术进步与“一带一路”国家经济增长
Factor Input, Technological Progress and Economic Growth of the “Belt and Road” Countries
DOI: 10.12677/SD.2020.105099, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 497  浏览: 1,516 
作者: 魏希茜:重庆大学公共管理学院,重庆
关键词: 一带一路全要素生产率贡献率VAROne Belt One Road Total Factor Productivity Contribution Rate VAR
摘要: 为了摸清“一带一路”沿线国家的基本情况,更好地推进“一带一路”战略的实施,本文在对“一带一路”沿线国家进行资本存量估算的基础上,采用基于DEA的Malmquist指数法测算样本国1995~2018年的全要素生产率(TFP),并对研究期间资本投入、劳动投入及TFP增长对经济增长的贡献率进行了计算。结果显示1996~2018年,“一带一路”国家TFP平均增长率为0,其中技术效率平均增长率为0.4%,技术进步增长率为−0.4%;资本投入对于经济增长的贡献率远高于TFP。此外,通过建立VAR模型分析了GDP增长对各因素冲击的响应,结果证明TFP对GDP增长具有显著影响。本文认为,经济增长从依赖资本投入转向依赖TFP增长是发展的必然,“一带一路”国家应注重技术创新,早日实现经济增长动能转换;中国在对外投资过程中应准确把握沿线各国特点,进行有选择性的投资。
Abstract: Based on the capital stock estimation of the countries along the “Belt and Road”, this paper uses the DEA-based Malmquist index method to measure the total factor productivity (TFP) of the sample countries from 1995 to 2018. The contribution of investment and TFP growth to economic growth was calculated. The results show that from 1996 to 2018, the average growth rate of TFP in the “Belt and Road” countries is 0, of which the average growth rate of technological efficiency is 0.4% and the growth rate of technological progress is −0.4%; the contribution rate of capital investment to economic growth is much higher than TFP. In addition, the VAR model was used to analyze the response of GDP growth to the impact of various factors, and the results proved that TFP had a significant impact on GDP growth. This article believes that economic growth is dependent on capital investment to TFP growth which is inevitable for development. The “Belt and Road” countries should focus on technological innovation and realize the conversion of economic growth momentum at an early date.
文章引用:魏希茜. 要素投入、技术进步与“一带一路”国家经济增长[J]. 可持续发展, 2020, 10(5): 810-825. https://doi.org/10.12677/SD.2020.105099

参考文献

[1] 孙琳琳, 任若恩. 中国资本投入和全要素生产率的估算[J]. 世界经济, 2005(12): 3-13.
[2] 李宾, 曾志雄. 中国全要素生产率变动的再测算:1978~2007年[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2009, 26(3): 3-15.
[3] 李平, 钟学义, 王宏伟, 郑世林. 中国生产率变化与经济增长源泉:1978~2010年[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2013, 30(1): 3-21.
[4] Maudos, J., Pastor, J.M. and Serrano, L. (1999) Total Factor Productivity Measurement and Human Capital in OECD Countries. Economics Letters, 63, 39-44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(98)00252-3
[5] Cristiano, A. and Francesco, Q. (2010) The Effects of Biased Technological Change on Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from a Sample of OECD Countries. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 361-383.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9134-2
[6] Leung, H.M. (1998) Productivity of Singapore’s Manufacturing Sector: An Industry Level Non-Parametric Study. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 15, 19-31.
[7] Timmer, M. and Ark, B.V. (2000) Capital Formation and Productivity Growth in South Korea and Taiwan: Realising the Catch-Up Potential in a World Diminishing Returns. CCSO Working Papers.
[8] 郭庆旺, 贾俊雪. 中国全要素生产率的估算: 1979~2004[J]. 经济研究, 2005(6): 51-60.
[9] 王兵, 颜鹏飞. 技术效率、技术进步与东亚经济增长——基于APEC视角的实证分析[J]. 经济研究, 2007(5): 91-103.
[10] 向琳, 胡艳. APEC经济体全要素生产率变动的测度分析——基于我国与其他APEC成员国的对比分析[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2015(9): 94-96.
[11] 王恕立, 胡宗彪. 中国服务业分行业生产率变迁及异质性考察[J]. 经济研究, 2012, 47(4): 15-27.
[12] 杨玉玲, 郭鹏飞. 省际第三产业资本存量:框架、检验及动态轨迹[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2017, 34(10): 78-93.