京津冀核心价值体系构建研究——以石家庄为例
Research on the Construction of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Core Value System—Taking Shijiazhuang as an Example
DOI: 10.12677/SD.2020.105100, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 447  浏览: 650  科研立项经费支持
作者: 白彩伟, 李万县:河北经贸大学公共管理学院,河北 石家庄
关键词: 京津冀共同体核心价值体系文化价值城市文化价值Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Community Core Value System Cultural Value Urban Cultural Value
摘要: 京津冀共同体建构的重要性,早在2015年原中科院牛文元院士就指出,“公地悲剧”和“邻避效应”是制约协同发展的根本原因,前者揭示了三地基于私利的发展困境,后者昭示了三地分区而治的协同难题。进而提出,“飞地经济”,即打破原有行政区划限制,建构共同体实现三地资源互补、经济协调发展。然而,“京津冀”区域共同体建构首先涉及价值世界和价值共识难题。事实上,党的十九大报告已经明确了“京津冀”区域共同体文化价值定向:“建设生态文明是中华民族永续发展的千年大计”,因而,关于“新生态”的价值体系研究就成为京津冀共同体建设的迫切课题,包括如何实现“京津冀”传统文化的现代转换、如何跨越人类命运共同体与现实文化鸿沟便成为本课题的研究任务。在研究京津冀共同体核心价值体系建构的过程中,以河北省省会城市石家庄为例,进行实证分析,验证文化与共同体的相关性。本文的分析进一步明确了石家庄正在逐渐形成以“包容谦和、奉献担当、开拓创新、向善厚德”为核心的城市文化价值,推动石家庄以更加开放、包容的姿态加强城市的发展,构建具有自身特色的文明发展之城。本文旨在通过对石家庄市的调研分析,为京津冀共同体核心价值体系建构提供思路。
Abstract: AS for the importance of the construction of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei community, as early as 2015, the former Academician Wenyuan Niu of the Chinese Academy of Sciences pointed out that the “tragedy of the commons” and the “neighboring effect” are the fundamental reasons for restricting coordinated development. The author clarified the coordination problem of the three regions. Furthermore, it is proposed that the “enclave economy” means breaking the original restrictions of administrative divisions and constructing a community to realize the complementary resource and coordinated economic development of the three places. However, the construction of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei regional community first involves the problem of value world and value consensus. In fact, the report of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China has clarified the cultural value orientation of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei regional community: “Building an ecological civilization is a millennium plan for the sustainable development of the Chinese nation.” Therefore, research on the value system of “new ecology” has become the urgent issues of the construction of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei community, including how to realize the modern transformation of the traditional culture of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, and how to bridge the gap between the community of shared future for mankind and the real culture which have become the research tasks of this subject. In the process of studying the construction of the core value system of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei community, Shijiazhuang, the capital city of Hebei Province, was taken as an example to conduct empirical analysis to verify the relevance of culture and community. The analysis of this article further clarifies that Shijiazhuang is gradually forming an urban cultural value centered on “tolerance, humility, dedication, pioneering and innovation, and kindness” as its core. It promotes Shijiazhuang to strengthen the development of the city in a more open and tolerant attitude, and build its own city of characteristic civilization development. This article aims to provide ideas for the construction of the core value system of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Community through the investigation and analysis of Shijiazhuang City.
文章引用:白彩伟, 李万县. 京津冀核心价值体系构建研究——以石家庄为例[J]. 可持续发展, 2020, 10(5): 826-843. https://doi.org/10.12677/SD.2020.105100

参考文献

[1] 闫国文. 传承历史, 发展融合——河北石家庄历史文化的精神价值研究[J]. 社会科学坛, 2017(11): 188-200.
[2] 李斌. 感悟石家庄的城市文化价值[J]. 中共石家庄市委党校学报, 2016, 18(1): 47-48.
[3] 吴家强. 石家庄文化资源与城市文化价值研究[J]. 产业与科技论坛, 2016, 15(21): 134-135.
[4] 王红英. 从历史传承与变迁看石家庄城市文化价值的构建[J]. 中国民族博览, 2016(4): 101-102.
[5] 朱凤荣. 石家庄精神内涵研究[J]. 党史博采(理论), 2013(2): 29-31.
[6] 刘江茹. “石家庄城市文化价值”之我见[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2012(30): 103-104.
[7] 何绍辉. 基于社会质量提升的场共同体评价指标体系构建探析[J]. 求索, 2016(2): 36-40.
[8] 邵四华. 京津冀协同发展战略下投融资需求及金融创新研究[J]. 华北金融, 2015(7): 16-21.
[9] 王菊英. 滕尼斯的共同体与社会理论——兼与韦伯、涂尔干理论比较[J]. 剑南文学: 经典阅读, 2012(2): 163-163.
[10] 袁祖社. “公共精神”: 培育当代民族精神的核心理论维度[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2006(1): 108-114.
[11] 许楠. 20世纪乌托邦共同体实验的经验与教训: 乌托邦实现性的影响因素分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2019.
[12] 代显梅. 霍桑的家园与共同体意识[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报: 1-8[2019-1205].
[13] 马炯. 人类命运共同体的内在逻辑、时代价值及实践向度[J]. 赣南师范大学学报, 2019, 40(4): 1-5.
[14] 贾若伦. 京津冀协同发展:发挥金融资本作用推动产业升级[J]. 国际融资, 2014(5): 30-32.