二元数据融合下的高光谱影像地物识别
The Combination of Sentinel-2 and GF-5 Spectral Image Was Used for Ground Object Recognition
DOI: 10.12677/AAM.2021.101021, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 武 宇*, 张 俊#, 黄康钰:贵州大学矿业学院,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 高分五号高光谱降维Sentinel-2随机森林GF-5 Hyperspectral Image Dimension Reduction Sentinel-2 Random Forest
摘要: 针对目前高分五号AHSI (the Advanced Hyperspectral Imager)相机存在的330个波段但是空间分辨率较低的问题,提出了高光谱影像结合Sentinel-2号卫星的3波段(560 nm)、4波段(664.5 nm)波段分别进行融合的方法,来解决高分五号卫星面临的地物分类精度不足的问题,进而提高精度。为了避免处理的过程中出现维数灾难的问题,首先对高分五号AHSI影像和Sentinel-2号影像分别预处理,再采用G-S (Gram-Schmidt)融合,最后利用随机森林算法进行分类识别,利用用户精度(User Accuracy, UA)、生产者精度(Producer Accuracy, PA)、整体分类精度(Overall Accuracy, OA)以及Kappa系数来评价精度。结果表明,利用随机森林算法对经过改进的数据在总体分类精度上有显著提高,相对于原始高光谱数据分别能够提升9.33%和10.17%,其中整体分类精度分别为97.57%和98.35%,KAPPA系数分别为0.9625、0.9731。
Abstract: Based on the current GF-5 AHSI (the Advanced Hyperspectral Imager) 330 bands exist the camera but low spatial resolution of the problem, put forward the Hyperspectral image combining satellite Sentinel-2 satellite’s 3 band (560 nm), 4 band (664.5 nm) band fusion method, to solve the high score 5 satellite faces the problem of insufficient feature classification accuracy, precision can be improved. In order to avoid dealing with the problem of dimension disaster, appear in the process of the first to score 5 AHSI image and Sentinel-2 image preprocessing, and then use the G-S (Gramm-Schmidt), the final random forests for classification recognition, using User Accuracy (User Accuracy, UA), the precision of producers (Producer Accuracy, PA), the Overall classification Accuracy (Overall Accuracy, OA) and Kappa coefficient to evaluate precision. The results show that compared with the original hyperspectral data, the overall classification accuracy of the fused high- resolution No. 5 image can be improved by 9.33% and 10.17%, respectively, and the overall classification accuracy of the fused high-resolution No. 5 image is 97.57% and 98.35%. The KAPPA coefficients were 0.9625 and 0.9731.
文章引用:武宇, 张俊, 黄康钰. 二元数据融合下的高光谱影像地物识别[J]. 应用数学进展, 2021, 10(1): 180-188. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2021.101021

参考文献

[1] 刘冰, 余旭初, 张鹏强, 等. 联合空-谱信息的高光谱影像深度三维卷积网络分类[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(1): 53-63.
[2] 魏祥坡, 余旭初, 谭熊, 等. CNN和三维Gabor滤波器的高光谱图像分类[J]. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 2020, 32(1): 90-98.
[3] 高奎亮, 张鹏强, 余旭初, 等. 基于Network in Network网络结构的高光谱影像分类方法[J]. 测绘科学技术学报, 2019, 36(5): 500-504+510.
[4] Romero, A., Gatta, C. and Camps-Valls, G. (2016) Unsupervised Deep Feature Extraction for Remote Sensing Image Classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 54, 1349-1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Liu, H., Jiang, H. and Zheng, R. (2016) The Hybrid Feature Selection Algorithm Based on Maximum Minimum Backward Selection Search Strategy for Liver Tissue Pathological Image Classification. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2016, Article ID: 7369137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 曹泽涛, 方子东, 姚瑾, 等. 基于随机森林的黄土地貌分类研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 452-463.
[7] 曹爽, 潘锁艳, 管海燕. 机载多光谱LiDAR的随机森林地物分类[J]. 测绘通报, 2019(11): 79-84.
[8] Song, M. and Chang, C.I. (2015) A Theory of Recursive Orthogonal Subspace Projection for Hyperspectral Imaging. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 53, 3055-3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Ge, H., Wang, L., Cheng, L., et al. (2017) An Adaptive Supervised Nonlinear Feature Extraction for Hyperspectral Imagery Classification. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 46, 367-376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 陈伟民, 张凌, 宋冬梅, 等. 基于AdaBoost改进随机森林的高光谱图像地物分类方法研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2018, 33(4): 612-620.
[11] 李冠东, 张春菊, 高飞, 等. 双卷积池化结构的3D-CNN高光谱遥感影像分类方法[J]. 中国图象图形学报, 2019, 24(4): 639-654.
[12] 吕杰, 郝宁燕, 李崇贵, 等. 利用随机森林和纹理特征的森林类型识别[J]. 遥感信息, 2017, 32(6): 109-114.
[13] 崔宾阁, 吴亚男, 钟勇, 等. 高光谱图像滚动引导递归滤波与地物分类[J]. 遥感学报, 2019, 23(3): 431-442.
[14] 黄鸿, 陈美利, 王丽华, 等. 空-谱协同正则化稀疏超图嵌入的高光谱图像分类[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(6): 676-687.
[15] 赵亮, 王立国, 刘丹凤. 高光谱图像子空间的波段选择[J]. 遥感学报, 2019, 23(5): 904-910.
[16] 张晶, 王亦斌, 方帅. 多标签高光谱图像地物分类[J]. 中国图象图形学报, 2020, 25(3): 568-578.