不同VR情景下自我损耗及疼痛共情能力对利他行为的影响
Effects of Self-Depletion and Pain Empathy on Altruistic Behavior under Different VR Scenarios
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2021.112050, PDF, 下载: 369  浏览: 606 
作者: 李拂晓:西南大学心理学部,重庆
关键词: 利他行为自我损耗独裁者博弈VR情景Altruistic Behavior Self-Destruction Dictator Game VR Scenario
摘要: 本研究通过控制不同的自我损耗状态与VR情景,来探究自我损耗与战争情景,以及个体的疼痛共情水平对大学生利他行为的影响。被试为西南大学学生97名。其中女生71名,男生26名。自我损耗状态通过Stroop实验范式的色词一致与色词不一致控制,VR情景分为中性情景与消极战争情景,并用独裁者博弈中分配给他人的金钱作为因变量来表示被试的利他水平。数据分析得到的结论如下:1) 自我损耗状态能够显著地降低了被试的利他行为,说明利他行为是一种理性的认知控制下的结果;2) VR战争与中性情景下被试的利他行为虽然没有显著的差异,但战争情景下被试减少了分配给他人的金额,这或许是因为VR战争情景能够引发消极情绪,而消极情绪会减少利他行为的产生有关;3) 疼痛共情水平与本研究中的利他行为没有显著相关。
Abstract: The present study aimed to examine the impact of ego-depletion, war scenarios and pain empathy level on altruistic behavior of college students by controlling different self-depletion states and VR scenarios. In this study, participants were 97 college students from the southwest university (71 females, 26 males). The state of self-depletion was controlled by the color word consistency and the color word inconsistency in the Stroop experiment paradigm. The VR scenes were divided into a neutral scenario and a negative battle scenario, and used the money allocated to other participants in the dictator game as a dependent variable to represent the participants’ Altruism level. Through SPSS20.0 analysis of the data, the main conclusions were as follows: 1) The state of self-depletion could significantly reduce the altruistic behavior of the subjects, indicating that altruistic behavior is a result of rational cognitive control; 2) There was no significant difference in altruistic behaviors between participants in the VR war and neutral situations. However, participants in war situations reduced the amount which they allocated to others, because the VR war scene could trigger negative emotions and negative emotions would reduce altruistic behavior; 3) The level of pain empathy was not significantly related to the altruism in this study.
文章引用:李拂晓 (2021). 不同VR情景下自我损耗及疼痛共情能力对利他行为的影响. 心理学进展, 11(2), 439-450. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2021.112050

参考文献

[1] 卡尼曼, 胡晓姣, 李爱民, 何梦莹(2013). 思考, 快与慢. 中国对外贸易, (3), 60.
[2] 李文辉, 李婵, 沈悦, 但菲(2015). 大学生共情对利他行为的影响: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 31(5), 571-577.
[3] 李一员(2013). 自然灾难改变儿童的利他行为. 博士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[4] 林曼(2014). 利他是直觉还是自控的结果?共情情境下的利他行为研究. 硕士学位论文, 金华: 浙江师范大学.
[5] 刘晓敏(2000). 亲社会行为与利他主义. 心理学探新, 20(3), 59-63.
[6] 孟景(2010). 情绪对疼痛共情的影响研究. 硕士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[7] 潘彦谷, 刘衍玲, 冉光明, 雷浩, 马建苓, 滕召军(2013). 动物和人类的利他本性: 共情的进化. 心理科学进展, 21(7), 1229-1238.
[8] 任俊, 李瑞雪, 詹鋆, 刘迪, 林曼, 彭年强(2014). 好人可能做出坏行为的心理学解释——基于自我控制资源损耗的研究证据. 心理学报, 46(6), 841-851.
[9] 陶维东, 孙弘进, 陶晓丽, 刘强, 吴灵丹, 罗文波(2006). 浸入式虚拟现实技术在心理学研究中的应用. 现代生物医学进展, 6(3), 58-62.
[10] 严念念(2016). 自我损耗对利他行为影响的实证研究. 硕士学位论文, 西安: 西北大学.
[11] 郑显亮, 顾海根(2010). 国外利他行为影响因素的研究综述. 外国中小学教育, (9), 51-55.
[12] Achtziger, A., Alós-Ferrer, C., & Wagner, A. K. (2015). Money, Depletion, and Prosociality in the Dictator Game. Journal of Neuroscience Psychology & Economics, 8, 1-14.
https://doi.org /10.1037/npe0000031
[13] Carrera, P., Oceja, L., Caballero, A., & Muñoz, D. (2013). I Feel So Sorry! Tapping the Joint Influence of Empathy and Personal Distress on Helping Behavior. Motivation & Emotion, 37, 335-345.
https://doi.org /10.1007/s11031-012-9302-9
[14] Comte, A. (1967). System of Positive Policy (Vol. 1). New York: Burt Franklin. (Originally Published in London, 1875)
[15] Cunningham, M. R. (1979). Weather, Mood, and Helping Behavior: Quasi Experiments with the Sunshine Samaritan. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 37, 1947-1956.
https://doi.org /10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.1947
[16] Danziger, N., Prkachin, K. M., & Willer, J. C. (2006). Is Pain the Price of Empathy? The Perception of Others’ Pain in Patients with Congenital Insensitivity to Pain. Brain, 129, 2494-2507.
https://doi.org /10.1093/brain/awl155
[17] Dewall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M. T., &Maner, J. K. (2008). Depletion Makes the Heart Grow Less Helpful: Helping as a Function of Self-Regulatory Energy and Genetic Relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1653-1662.
https://doi.org /10.1177/0146167208323981
[18] Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Gaertner, S. L., Schroeder, D. A., & Clark III, R. D. (1991). The Arousal: Cost-Reward Model and the Process of Intervention: A Review of the Evidence.
[19] Einolf, C. J. (2008). Empathic Concern and Prosocial Behaviors: A Test of Experimental Results Using Survey Data. Social Science Research, 37, 1267-1279.
https://doi.org /10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.06.003
[20] Felnhofer, A., Kothgassner, O. D., Schmidt, M., Heinzle, A. K., Beutl, L., Hlavacs, H. et al. (2015). Is Virtual Reality Emotionally Arousing? Investigating Five Emotion Inducing Virtual Park Scenarios. International Journal of Human—Computer Studies, 82, 48-56.
https://doi.org /10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.05.004
[21] Hamilton, W. (1964). The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-16.
https://doi.org /10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4
[22] Laufer, R. S., Gallops, M. S., & Frey-Wouters, E. (1984). War Stress and Trauma: The Vietnam Veteran Experience. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 25, 65-85.
https://doi.org /10.2307/2136705
[23] MacLean, P. D. (1985). Brain Evolution Relating to Family, Play, and the Separation Call. Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 405-417.
https://doi.org /10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790270095011
[24] Miller, P. A., Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Shell, R. (1996). Relations of Moral Reasoning and Vicarious Emotion to Young Children’s Prosocial Behavior toward Peers and Adults. Developmental Psychology, 32, 210.
https://doi.org /10.1037/0012-1649.32.2.210
[25] Myrseth, K. O. R., Riener, G., &Wollbrant, C. E. (2015). Tangible Temptation in the Social Dilemma: Cash, Cooperation, and Self-Control. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 8, 61.
https://doi.org /10.1037/npe0000035
[26] Rao, L. L., Han, R., Ren, X. P., Bai, X. W., Zheng, R., Liu, H., Li, S. et al. (2011). Disadvantage and Prosocial Behavior: The Effects of the Wenchuan Earthquake. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 63-69.
https://doi.org /10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.07.002
[27] Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High Self-Control Predicts Good Adjustment, Less Pathology, Better Grades, and Interpersonal Success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271-324.
https://doi.org /10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x
[28] Vollhardt, J. R. (2009). Altruism Born of Suffering and Prosocial Behavior Following Adverse Life Events: A Review and Conceptualization. Social Justice Research, 22, 53-97.
https://doi.org /10.1007/s11211-009-0088-1
[29] Wang, L., Malhotra, D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2011). Economics Education and Greed. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10, 643-660.
https://doi.org /10.5465/amle.2009.0185