盆底超声及相关新技术评估盆底肌收缩功能的临床价值
The Clinical Value of Pelvic Floor Ultrasound and Related New Technologies in Evaluating Pelvic Floor Muscle Contraction Function
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2022.127965, PDF, 下载: 202  浏览: 296 
作者: 谢川博:自贡市妇幼保健院超声影像科,四川 自贡;满 琴:自贡市妇幼保健院产前诊断中心,四川 自贡
关键词: 盆底超声盆底功能障碍盆底收缩功能Pelvic Floor Ultrasound Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Pelvic Floor Contraction Function
摘要: 盆底功能障碍(FPFD)是产后女性一种常见的疾病,对生活质量有负面影响,包括尿失禁、便失禁及性障碍等多种临床表现。由于盆底是人体中最复杂的区域之一,仅通过病史采集和体格检查很难做出有效的评估,为了进行准确的诊断,不同的成像方式一直在使用,包括磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT);如今,随着超声技术的不断发展,盆底超声已成为盆底成像的最佳选择之一,特别是在该种成像模式基础上发展而来的一系列新的超声检查方法,对于盆底肌收缩功能的临床分析十分有价值。本文旨在介绍盆底成像中新兴的超声技术,包括容积渲染、融合成像、运动跟踪和彩色矢量映射及超声盆底测压及弹性成像等。
Abstract: Pelvic floor dysfunction (FPFD) is a common disorder in postpartum women that negatively affects quality of life, including multiple clinical manifestations such as urinary incontinence, fecal inconti-nence, and sexual disturbances. Since the pelvic floor is one of the most complex regions in the hu-man body, it is difficult to make an effective assessment through history taking and physical exam-ination alone. To make an accurate diagnosis, different imaging modalities have been used, includ-ing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT); nowadays, with the contin-uous development of ultrasound technology, pelvic floor ultrasound has become one of the best choices for pelvic floor imaging, especially a series of new ultrasound developed on the basis of this imaging mode. The examination method is very valuable for the clinical analysis of pelvic floor mus-cle contraction function. This article aims to introduce emerging ultrasound techniques in pelvic floor imaging, including volume rendering, fusion imaging, motion tracking and color vector map-ping, ultrasound pelvic floor manometry and elastography.
文章引用:谢川博, 满琴. 盆底超声及相关新技术评估盆底肌收缩功能的临床价值[J]. 临床医学进展, 2022, 12(7): 6690-6694. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2022.127965

参考文献

[1] Alshiek, J., Wei, Q., Jalalizadeh, M., Chitnis, P. and Abbas Shobeiri, S. (2020) The Effect of Aging on Pelvic Floor Pressure Meas-urements in Nulliparous Women. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 10, 751-769.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2020.1060070
[2] Batista, E.M., Conde, D.M., Do Amaral, W.N. and Martinez, E.Z. (2011) Com-parison of Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength between Women Undergoing Vaginal Delivery, Cesarean Section, and Nulliparae Using a Perineometer and Digital Palpation. Gynecological Endocrinology, 27, 910-914.
https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2011.569603
[3] Angelo, P.H., Varella, L.R.D., de Oliveira, M.C.E., Matias, M.G.L., de Azevedo, M.A.R., de Almeida, L.M., et al. (2017) A Manometry Classification to Assess Pelvic Floor Muscle Function in Women. PLOS ONE, 12, e0187045.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187045
[4] Abe-Takahashi, Y., Kitta, T., Ouchi, M., Chiba, H., Higuchi, M., Togo, M., et al. (2022) Examination of Pelvic Floor Muscle Elasticity in Patients with Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome Using Real-Time Tissue Elastography. International Urogynecology Journal, 33, 619-626.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04761-7
[5] Bo, K., Frawley, H.C., Haylen, B.T., Abramov, Y., Almeida, F.G., Berghmans, B., et al. (2017) An International Urogynecological Asso-ciation (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) Joint Report on the Terminology for the Conservative and Nonpharmacological Management of Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 36, 221-244.
https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23107
[6] Kreft, M., Cai, P., Furrer, E., et al. (2022) 2D Pelvic Floor Ultrasound Imaging in Identi-fying Levator Ani Muscle Trauma Agrees Highly with 4D Ultrasound Imaging. International Urogynecology Journal, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05198-2
[7] Chernyak, V., Bleier, J., Kobi, M., Paquette, I., Flusberg, M., Zimmern, P., et al. (2021) Clinical Applications of Pelvic Floor Imaging: Opinion Statement Endorsed by the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR), American Urological Association (AUA), and American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Abdominal Radiology, 46, 1451-1464.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03017-8
[8] Qu, E., Wu, J., Zhang, M., et al. (2021) The Ultrasound Diagnostic Criteria for Diastasis Recti and Its Correlation with Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Early Postpartum Women. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 11, 706.
https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-20-596
[9] Bahrami, S., Khatri, G., Sheridan, A.D., et al. (2021) Pelvic Floor Ultrasound: When, Why, and How? Abdominal Radiology, 46, 1395-1413.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02216-8
[10] Zhang, Y., Deng, S. and Zhang, Y. (2021) Comparison of Sensitivity and Specificity of Three-Dimensional Pelvic Floor Ultrasound and Conventional Ul-trasound in Pelvic Floor Assessment after Delivery. American Journal of Translational Research, 13, 12026.
[11] Noort, F., Sirmacek, B. and Slump, C.H. (2021) Recurrent U-Net for Automatic Pelvic Floor Muscle Segmentation on 3D Ultrasound.
[12] Dietz, H.P. (2021) Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Role of Imaging in Diagnosis and Management. In: Shetty, M.K., Ed., Breast & Gynecological Dis-eases, Springer, Cham, 405-439.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69476-0_13
[13] Egorov, V., Abbas Shobeiri, S., Takacs, P., Hoyte, L., Lucente, V. and van Raalte, H. (2018) Biomechanical Mapping of the Female Pelvic Floor: Prolapse versus Normal Condi-tions. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 8, 900-924.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2018.810093
[14] Woźniak, M.M., Wieczorek, A.P., Santoro, G.A., et al. (2021) Technical Innova-tions in Pelvic Floor Ultrasonography. In: Santoro, G.A., Wieczorek, A.P. and Sultan, A.H., Eds., Pelvic Floor Disorders, Springer, Cham, 147-170.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40862-6_9
[15] Egorov, V., van Raalte, H. and Shobeiri, S.A. (2021) Tactile and Ultrasound Image Fusion for Functional Assessment of the Female Pelvic Floor. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11, 674-688.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2021.116063
[16] Nygaard, I., Barber, M.D., Burgio, K.L., Kenton, K., Meikle, S., Schaffer, J., et al. (2008) Prevalence of Symptomatic Pelvic Floor Disorders in US Women. Journal of the American Medical Association, 300, 1311-1316.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.11.1311
[17] Lucente, V., van Raalte, H., Murphy, M. and Egorov, V. (2017) Biomechanical Paradigm and Interpretation of Female Pelvic Floor Conditions before a Treatment. International Journal of Women’s Health, 9, 521-550.
https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S136989
[18] Wieczorek, A.P., Woźniak, M.M., Piłat, J. and Santoro, G.A. (2021) Principles and Technical Aspects of Integrated Pelvic Floor Ultrasound. In: Santoro, G.A., Wieczorek, A.P. and Sultan, A.H., Eds., Pelvic Floor Dis-orders: A Multidisciplinary Textbook, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 73-87.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40862-6_5
[19] Yu, H., Zheng, H.M., Zhang, X.Y., Zhou, Y.Q. and Xie, M. (2021) Associa-tion between Elastography Findings of the Levator Ani and Stress Urinary Incontinence. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction, 50, Article ID: 101906.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101906
[20] Zhong, T., Wang, L., Li, Z., et al. (2022) Diagnostic Value of Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification Shear Wave Elastography Combined with Pelvic Ultrasound in Pelvic Floor Dysfunction after Vaginal Delivery. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 19, 226.