论国际法对美国次级制裁的效果约束及中国阻断法的实施
The Restraint Effect of International Law on the US Secondary Sanctions and the Implementation of China Blocking Statute
摘要: 自美国对伊朗实施制裁后,次级制裁逐渐成为制裁古巴、朝鲜、俄罗斯和委内瑞拉的主要施压工具。以美国在伊核协定前后对伊朗实施的次级制裁效果为例,在国际法正当性缺失基础上,将引发其他国家采取阻断措施和“寒蝉效应”的负面作用,从而削弱美国次级制裁的实际效果。其不仅会增加美国施加次级制裁的成本,也会增加国际局势的不稳定性和谈判难度。在厘清国际法正当性对一国次级制裁的效果约束原理上,中国应有的放矢的实施《阻断外国法律与措施不当域外适用办法》和《反外国制裁法》。在国家政策层面,应通过国际法正当性证成的话语体系明确阻断措施的适用条件,通过阻断法机制表明对美国次级制裁不当域外适用的反对立场。在争取国际社会共识的同时,通过国际合作与人民币国际化进程削弱美国次级制裁的实际效果。在国内实施阻断法过程中,也应平衡实施阻断法的公共政策目标及其对国内企业造成的经济损失和合规成本。在司法实践中,应适用“比例原则”判断阻断法对国际商事合同中“制裁条款”的效力影响及救济措施。
Abstract: Since the United States imposed sanctions on Iran, secondary sanctions have gradually become the main pressure tool against Cuba, North Korea, Russia and Venezuela. Taking the effect of secondary sanc-tions imposed by the US on Iran before and after the Iran nuclear Agreement as an example, based on the lack of legitimacy in international law, other countries will take blocking measures and “chilling effect”, thus weakening the practical effect of the US secondary sanctions. It will not only increase the cost of secondary sanctions imposed by the United States, but also increase the insta-bility of the international situation and the difficulty of negotiations. In order to clarify the principle of the effect constraint of the legitimacy of international law on a country’s secondary sanctions, China should implement the Measures for Blocking the Improper Extraterritorial Application of Foreign Laws and Measures and the Law on Anti-Foreign Sanctions with a clear aim. At the level of national policy, the application conditions of blocking measures should be clarified through the discourse system based on the justification of international law, and the opposition to the improper extraterritorial application of secondary sanctions by the United States should be demonstrated through the mechanism of blocking statute. While striving for the consensus of the international community, the practical effect of the secondary sanctions of the United States should be weakened through international cooperation and RMB internationalization process. In the process of imple-menting the blocking statute in China, the public policy objectives of the blocking statute and the economic losses and compliance costs caused to domestic enterprises should also be balanced. In judicial practice, the “principle of proportionality” should be applied to judge the effect of PRC blocking statute on the sanction clauses in international commercial contracts and the relief measures.
文章引用:余遵琼. 论国际法对美国次级制裁的效果约束及中国阻断法的实施[J]. 争议解决, 2023, 9(2): 584-595. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2023.92078

参考文献

[1] Ruys, T. and Ryngaert, C. (2020) Secondary Sanctions: A Weapon out of Control? The International Legality of, and European Responses to, US Secondary Sanctions. British Yearbook of International Law, 141-156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Marossi, A.Z. and Bassett, M.R. (2015) Economic Sanctions under In-ternational Law: Unilateralism, Multilateralism, Legitimacy, and Consequences. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, 45-60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Gordon, C.J. (2013) The Human Costs of the Iran Sanctions. Philosophy Faculty Publications, 39-48.
[4] Gheibi, P. (2022) The Rise and Fall of U.S. Secondary Sanctions: The Iran Outcasting and Re-Outcasting Regime. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 50, 392-421.
[5] Beaucillon, C. (2021) Research Handbook on Unilateral and Extraterritorial Sanctions. University of Lille, Lille, 128-137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] 白雪, 邹国勇. 美国“长臂管辖”的欧盟应对: 措施、成效与启示[J]. 武大国际法评论, 2021, 5(5): 53-76.
[7] 杜涛, 周美华. 应对美国单边经济制裁的域外经验与中国方案——从《阻断办法》到《反外国制裁法》[J]. 武大国际法评论, 2021, 5(4): 1-24.
[8] 龚柏华. 中美经贸摩擦背景下美国单边经贸制裁及其法律应对[J]. 经贸法律评论, 2019(6): 1-12.
[9] Johnson, A. (2012) EU and US Sanctions: Extra-Territoriality and Financial Transactions. Journal of International Banking and Financial Law, 11, 684-689.
[10] 杜涛. 国际商事合同中的经济制裁条款效力研究[J]. 上海对外经贸大学学报, 2020, 27(5): 5-21.
[11] 漆彤. 欧盟《阻断法》的适用困境及其对我国的启示——以伊朗梅利银行诉德国电信案为例[J]. 财经法学, 2022, 43(1): 179-192.
[12] Dupont, P.-E. (2018) Dealing with Conflicting Sanctions Compliance Obligations in Financial Transactions. Journal of International Banking and Financial Law, 10, 642-648.
[13] Van Haute, C., Nordin, S. and Forwood, G. (2018) The Reincarnation of the EU Blocking Regulation: Putting European Companies between a Rock and a Hard Place. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 13, 11-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Maya Lester, Q.C. and Matthews, R. (2020) Sanctions Clauses in Loan Agreements. Journal of International Banking and Financial Law, 9, 592-597.
[15] 黄文旭, 邹璞韬. 反制国内法域外适用的工具: 阻断法的经验及启示[J]. 时代法学, 2021, 19(4): 88-98.
[16] 姜悠悠. 论美国单边制裁对国际商事合同法律适用的影响[J]. 财经法学, 2022(2): 176-192.
[17] Orford, A. (1999) Muscular Humanitarianism Reading the Narratives of the New Intervention. European Journal of International Law, 10, 679-711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Koskenniemi, M. (2018) What Is International Law for? Malcolm Evans, International Law. 5th Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 128-140.
[19] 徐伟功. 论次级经济制裁之阻断立法[J]. 法商研究, 2021, 38(2): 187-200.