直播诈骗犯罪既遂标准刍议
Criteria for Attempting the Crime of Direct Broadcast Fraud
摘要: 近来,伴随着直播带货的兴起,直播诈骗案件呈现出多发之势。学界对于直播诈骗罪的认定虽无争议,但该类诈骗犯罪的既遂标准认定却存在较大分歧。故本文将以燕窝风味饮料案为样本,从诈骗罪构成要件出发,深入剖析直播诈骗行为特点,明确“被害人财产损失”在直播诈骗既遂标准认定中的决定性地位,力求证明直播诈骗既遂应当以犯罪人收到货款为准。
Abstract:
Recently, along with the rise of live-streaming with goods, live-streaming fraud cases have shown a multiplicity of trends. Although there is no controversy in the academic community about the determination of live fraud, there is a big difference in the determination of the standard of attempt of this kind of fraud crime. Therefore, this paper will take the bird’s nest flavored beverage case as a sample, and analyze the characteristics of live fraud from the elements of fraud, clarify the decisive position of “victim’s property loss” in the determination of attempted live fraud, and try to prove that attempted live fraud should be based on the victim’s confirmation of receipt.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
辛巴承认售假, 赔付6198万[EB/OL]. https://m.thepaper.cn/baijiahao_10186595, 2020-12-04.
|
|
[2]
|
张明楷. 刑法学下[M]. 第五版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016: 938, 1000.
|
|
[3]
|
刘艳红. 刑法学下[M]. 第二版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016: 322.
|
|
[4]
|
刘宪权. 刑法学下[M]. 第四版. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2016: 638.
|
|
[5]
|
刘明祥. 论诈骗罪中的财产损害[J]. 湘潭工学院学报(社会科学版), 2001, 3(1): 47-50.
|
|
[6]
|
刘明祥. 财产罪比较研究[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2001: 246.
|
|
[7]
|
钱叶六. 诈骗罪既遂与未遂认定标准刍议[J]. 南京经济学院学报, 2002(6): 67-69.
|
|
[8]
|
张明楷. 财产性利益是诈骗罪的对象[J]. 法律科学(西北政法学院学报), 2005, 23(3): 72-82.
|
|
[9]
|
张明楷. 论诈骗罪中的财产损失[J]. 中国法学, 2005(5): 118-137.
|
|
[10]
|
杜文俊, 赵拥军. 财产犯罪既遂标准中的控制说及其司法认定[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛), 2015, 30(2): 28-34.
|
|
[11]
|
张明楷. 诈骗罪与金融诈骗罪研究[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2006: 7-8.
|
|
[12]
|
张明楷. 法益初论[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2000: 271.
|