[1]
|
Doizi, S. and Traxer, O. (2018) Flexible Ureteroscopy: Technique, TIPS and Tricks. Urolithiasis, 46, 47-58.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-1030-x
|
[2]
|
De Coninck, V., Keller, E.X., Somani, B., et al. (2020) Compli-cations of Ureteroscopy: A Complete Overview. World Journal of Urology, 38, 2147-2166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-03012-1
|
[3]
|
Reis Santos, J.M. (2018) Ureteroscopy from the Recent Past to the Near Future. Urolithiasis, 46, 31-37.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-1016-8
|
[4]
|
Giusti, G., Proietti, S., Villa, L., et al. (2016) Current Standard Technique for Modern Flexible Ureteroscopy: Tips and Tricks. European Urology, 70, 188-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.035
|
[5]
|
Secker, A., Rassweiler, J. and Neisius, A. (2019) Future Per-spectives of Flexible Ureteroscopy. Current Opinion in Urology, 29, 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000575
|
[6]
|
夏雨. 输尿管软镜技术进展[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2016, 16(2): 168-171.
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2016.02.020
|
[7]
|
Tao, W., Ming, X., Zang, Y., et al. (2022) The Clinical Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy and Laser Lithotripsy (FURSL) for Treatment of the Upper Urinary Tract Calculi. Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology, 30, 123-133.
https://doi.org/10.3233/XST-210992
|
[8]
|
Bagley, D.H. (1987) Flexible Ureteropyeloscopy with Modular, “Dis-posable” Endo-Scope. Urology, 29, 296-300.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(87)90074-4
|
[9]
|
Bosio, A., Alessandria, E., Dalmasso, E., et al. (2022) Flexible Ureterorenoscopy versus Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones ≤ 2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial. European Urology Focus, 8, 1816-1822.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2022.04.004
|
[10]
|
Lv, G., Qi, W., Gao, H., et al. (2022) Safety and Efficacy of Ex-tracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy vs. Flexible Ureteroscopy in the Treatment of Urinary Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Surgery, 9, Article ID: 925481. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.925481
|
[11]
|
Zeng, G., Cai, C., Duan, X., et al. (2021) Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Is a Noninferior Modality to Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Management of 20-40 mm Renal Calculi: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. European Urology, 79, 114-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.026
|
[12]
|
Xuan, H., Du, Z., Xia, L., et al. (2022) Comparison of Outcomes between Flexible Ureteroscopy and Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Upper Calyceal Calculi Larger than 2 cm. BMC Urology, 22, 183.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01142-0
|
[13]
|
Lv, G., Wang, K., Zhang, Z., et al. (2022) Comparison of Flexible Ureteroscopy and Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment for Renal Calculi Larger than 2 cm: A Matched-Pair Analysis. Urolithiasis, 50, 501-507.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-022-01336-z
|
[14]
|
Zhang, Y., Li, J., Jiao, J.W., et al. (2021) Comparative Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy and Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Pediatric Kidney Stones Larger than 2 cm. International Journal of Urology: Official Journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 28, 650-655. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14532
|
[15]
|
Bach, T., Netsch, C., Herrmann, T.R., et al. (2011) Objective Assessment of Working Tool Impact on Irrigation Flow and Visibility in Flexible Ureterorenoscopes. Journal of Endourology, 25, 1125-1129.
https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0739
|
[16]
|
Haberman, K., Ortiz-Alvarado, O., Chotikawanich, E., et al. (2011) A Dual-Channel Flexible Ureteroscope: Evaluation of Deflection, Flow, Illumination, and Optics. Journal of Endourology, 25, 1411-1414.
https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0642
|
[17]
|
Brevik, A., Peta, A., Okhunov, Z., et al. (2022) Prospective, Ran-domized Comparison of Dual-Lumen vs Single-Lumen Flexible Ureteroscopes in Proximal Ureteral and Renal Stone Management. Journal of Endourology, 36, 921-926. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0037
|
[18]
|
Qi, S., Yang, E., Bao, J., et al. (2020) Single-Use versus Reusable Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes for the Treatment of Renal Calculi: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Endourology, 34, 18-24.
https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0473
|
[19]
|
Jun, D.Y., Cho, K.S., Jeong, J.Y., et al. (2022) Comparison of Surgi-cal Outcomes between Single-Use and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes for Renal Stone Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 58, 1388. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101388
|
[20]
|
Proietti, S., Dragos, L., Emiliani, E., et al. (2017) Ureteroscopic Skills with and without Roboflex Avicenna in the K-Box((R)) Simulator. Central European Journal of Urology, 70, 76-80.
|
[21]
|
Shu, X., Hua, P., Wang, S., et al. (2022) Safety Enhanced Surgical Robot for Flexible Ureteroscopy Based on Force Feedback. The International Journal of Medical Robotics + Computer Assisted Surgery: MRCAS, 18, e2410.
https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2410
|
[22]
|
Hennessey, D.B., Fojecki, G.L., Papa, N.P., et al. (2018) Single-Use Dis-posable Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes: An ex Vivo Assessment and Cost Analysis. BJU International, 121, 55-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14235
|
[23]
|
Mager, R., Kurosch, M., Hofner, T., et al. (2018) Clinical Outcomes and Costs of Reusable and Single-Use Flexible Ureterorenoscopes: A Prospective Cohort Study. Urolithiasis, 46, 587-593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-018-1042-1
|