基于AI技术光谱CT非增强模式椎体松质骨无水碘图测量值与骨密度对比研究
A Comparative Study of Iodine-No-Water Map Observed Value and Bone Density of Vertebral Cancellous Bone in Non-Enhanced Spectral CT Mode Based on AI
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.13102308, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 唐劲松, 魏 雯, 吴道清, 郑春红, 李宏华, 苏煜敏:福建中医药大学附属第二人民医院影像科,福建 福州;钱宝鑫:慧影医疗科技(北京)股份有限公司,北京
关键词: 能量CT定量CT无水碘图人工智能骨密度Dual-Energy CT Iodine No Water Artificial Intelligence Bone Mineral Density
摘要: 目的:基于人工智能(Artificial intelligence, AI)技术提取光谱CT非增强模式无水碘图椎体松质骨测量值与骨密度测定的相关性对比研究,为骨密度测量提供新的方法和思路。方法:回顾性纳入317例接受了光谱CT腰椎平扫检查的健康体检者,分别使用AI骨密度测量系统和双能X线骨密度仪(dual x-ray absorptiometry, DXA)测量受检者第一腰椎到第四腰椎(L1~L4)椎体的骨密度(bone mineral density, BMD)值。采用线性回归方法分析非增强模式无水碘图测量值与上述两种方法测定骨密度值的相关性。以DXA结果为参考标准将受检者分为正常(T-score ≥ −1), 骨质减少症(−2.5 < T-score < −1)和骨质疏松症(T-score < −2.5),将AI骨密度测量系统预测的骨质情况以及非增强无水碘图测量值预测的骨质情况分别与DXA生成的真实骨质情况进行比较。绘制受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic, ROC)曲线,计算受试者工作特征分析的曲线下面积(area under the curve, AUC),利用达到约登指数的截断值评估AI系统以及非增强模式无水碘图椎体松质骨测量值诊断受检者骨质情况的准确性、敏感性和特异性。结果:非增强模式无水碘图测量值与AI系统测量L1~L4椎体的骨密度线性回归拟合优度R2为0.91~0.93;非增强模式无水碘图测量值与DXA测量L1~L4椎体的骨密度之间的相关性有所降低,相关系数R2为0.57~0.65。以DXA为诊断标准,AI系统与非增强模式无水碘图测量值在评估检测骨质疏松症上,二者均有较好的性能。结论:光谱CT非增强模式腰椎松质骨无水碘图测量值同椎体BMD值密切相关,非增强模式腰椎松质骨无水碘图测量值能很好体现椎体骨密度状态,有望成为椎体骨矿含量高低变化的敏感指标。
Abstract: Objective: To study the correlation between vertebral cancellous bone measurement and bone mineral density measurement based on the extraction of non-enhanced spectral CT Iodine-no- wa-ter Map observed value with artificial intelligence (AI), and to provide a new method and idea for bone mineral density measurement. Method: A total of 317 healthy subjects who underwent spec-tral CT lumbar scan were retrospectively enrolled using AI bone densitometry system and dual x-ray absorptiometry bone mineral density (BMD) was measured from the first to the fourth lumbar vertebrae (L1~L4). Linear regression method was used to analyze the correlation between the non-enhanced mode anhydrous iodiogram measurements and the BMD values measured by the above two methods. The patients were classified as normal (T-score ≥ −1), osteopenia (−2.5 < T-score < −1) and osteoporosis (T-score < −2.5) using DXA results as the reference standard. The bone condition predicted by the AI bone densitometry system and the non-enhanced Iodine-no- water Map observed value measurements were compared with the actual bone condition generated by DXA. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Truncation values reaching the Yoden index were used to evaluate the accu-racy, sensitivity, and specificity of the AI system and the non-enhanced mode Iodine-no-water Map observed value vertebral cancellous bone measurements in diagnosing patients with bone condi-tions. Results: The linear regression goodness of fit R2 between the measured values of anhydrous iodiogram in non-enhanced mode and the bone mineral density of L1~L4 vertebral body measured by AI system was 0.91~0.93. The correlation between non-enhanced anhydrous iodiogram meas-urements and DXA measurements of bone mineral density in the L1~L4 vertebral body was re-duced, with a correlation coefficient of 0.77~0.65 in R2. Using DXA as diagnostic criteria, both AI system and non-enhanced mode anhydrous iodiogram showed good performance in evaluating and detecting osteoporosis. Conclusions: The measurement values of lumbar cancellous bone Io-dine-no-water Map observed value in non-enhanced CT mode are closely related to vertebral BMD values. The measurement values of lumbar cancellous bone Iodine-no-water Map observed value in non-enhanced CT mode can well reflect the status of vertebral bone mineral density, which is ex-pected to be a sensitive index for the change of vertebral bone mineral content.
文章引用:唐劲松, 魏雯, 钱宝鑫, 吴道清, 郑春红, 李宏华, 苏煜敏. 基于AI技术光谱CT非增强模式椎体松质骨无水碘图测量值与骨密度对比研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(10): 16483-16493. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.13102308

参考文献

[1] 《中国定量CT骨质疏松症诊断指南(2018)》工作组. 中国定量CT骨质疏松症诊断指南(2018) [J]. 中华健康管理学杂志, 2019, 13(3): 195-200.
[2] Agten, C.A., Ramme, A.J., Kang, S., et al. (2017) Cost-Effectiveness of Virtual Bone Strength Testing in Osteoporosis Screening Programs for Postmenopausal Women in the United States. Radiology, 285, 506-517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 张智海, 刘忠厚, 李娜, 等. 中国人骨质疏松症诊断标准专家共识(第三稿∙2014版) [J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2014, 20(9): 1007-1010.
[4] 夏维波, 章振林, 林华, 等. 原发性骨质疏松症诊疗指南(2017) [J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2019, 25(3): 281-309.
[5] 马远征, 王以朋, 刘强, 等. 中国老年骨质疏松症诊疗指南(2018) [J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2018, 24(12): 1541-1567.
[6] 中华医学会放射学分会, 中国医师协会放射医师分会, 安徽省影像临床医学研究中心. 能量CT临床应用中国专家共识[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2022, 56(5): 476-487.
[7] 中华医学会放射学分会骨关节学组, 中国医师协会放射医师分会肌骨学组, 中华医学会骨科学分会骨质疏松学组, 等. 骨质疏松的影像学与骨密度诊断专家共识[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2020, 54(8): 745-752.
[8] 韩雪莉. 迭代模型重建技术在低剂量胸部CT联合腰椎QCT扫描中的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2018.
[9] 蒋耀军, 吴艳, 张永高, 等. 低管电流联合多模型迭代重建技术对腰椎定量CT准确度的应用价值[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2018, 38(1): 59-63.
[10] 刘桐希, 李香凝, 曾庆, 等. 胸部低剂量CT筛查联合定量CT骨密度测量在健康体检中的应用[J]. 中华健康管理学杂志, 2018, 12(3): 269-271.
[11] 严福华, 金征宇. 能量CT多参数分析的临床应用和发展前景[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2021, 55(12): 1233-1234.
[12] Robbert, W., Arnold, M.R., Klaus, E., Annemarie, M., et al. (2017) Accuracy of Bone Mineral Den-sity Quantification Using Dual-Layer Spectral Detector CT: A Phantom Study. European Radiology, 27, 4351-4359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Valentinitsch, A., Trebeschi, S., Kaesmacher, J., et al. (2019) Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening in Multi-Detector CT Images via Local Classification of Textures. Osteoporosis International, 30, 1275-1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Savage, R.H., van Assen, M., Martin, S.S., Sahbaee, P., et al. (2020). Utilizing Artificial Intelligence to Determine Bone Mineral Density via Chest Computed Tomography. Journal of Thoracic Imaging, 35, S35-S39.[CrossRef
[15] Hsieh, I., et al. (2021) Automated Bone Mineral Density Prediction and Fracture Risk Assessment Using Plain Radiographs via Deep Learning. Nature Communications, 12, Ar-ticle No. 5472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Yasaka, Akai, H., Kunimatsu, A., Kiryu, S. and Abe, O. (2020) Prediction of Bone Mineral Density from Computed Tomography: Application of Deep Learning with a Convolutional Neural Network. European Radiology, 30, 3549-3557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Christian, B., Jochen, N., Moritz, H.A., et al. (2020) Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Dual-Energy CT-Based Bone Mineral Density Assessment in Comparison to Hounsfield Unit Measurements Using Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry as Standard of Reference. European Journal of Radiology, 132, Arti-cle ID: 109321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Salzmann, S.N., Shirahata, T., Yang, J., et al. (2019) Regional Bone Mineral Density Differences Measured by Quantitative Computed Tomography: Does the Standard Clinically Used L1-L2 Average Correlate with the Entire Lumbosacral Spine? The Spine Journal, 19, 695-702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. and Brox, T. (2015) U-Net: Con-volutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Interven-tion—MICCAI 2015, Munich, 5-9 October 2015, 234-241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Huang, G., Liu, Z., Laurens, V., et al. (2016) Densely Con-nected Convolutional Networks. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, 21-26 July 2017, 2261-2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 包洁, 邹达, 李危石. 椎体CT值评估腰椎退变受检者骨密度的研究进展[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2020, 30(8): 745-750.
[22] 骨质疏松的影像学与骨密度诊断专家共识[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2020, 40(16): 1039-1046.
[23] 程晓光, 王亮, 曾强, 吴静. 中国定量CT (QCT)骨质疏松症诊断指南(2018) [J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2019, 25(6): 733-737.