PSMA PET/CT和PET/MRI在前列腺癌初始分期中的作用
The Role of PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI in the Initial Staging of Prostate Cancer
摘要: 前列腺癌(PCa)是男性最常见的实体器官恶性肿瘤,也是导致癌症死亡的第三大原因。准确的PCa检测和分期方法是确定疾病程度和治疗方案的必要条件。回顾前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)成像在PCa初步分期中的表现和诊断准确性,并评估其对明确治疗计划的影响。与传统成像相比,PSMA PET对检测前列腺内肿瘤具有中等程度的高灵敏度和特异性,对检测区域和盆腔外转移瘤具有中等程度的高灵敏度。PSMA PET还可在手术前检测前列腺外疾病方面发挥重要作用,并可指导手术规划。此外,PSMA PET已被证明是对治疗无效患者进行明确放疗计划的有效工具。因此,回顾了前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)成像在前列腺癌(PCa)初始分期中的诊断准确性和对治疗的影响。我们得出结论:PSMA正电子发射计算机断层成像能有效地对初期PCa进行成像,并能帮助患者修改治疗方案。
Abstract: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common solid organ malignancy in men and the third leading cause of cancer death. Accurate PCa detection and staging methods are essential for determining the extent of disease and treatment options. Review prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in Performance and diagnostic accuracy in PCa initial staging, and to assess its impact on a definitive treatment plan. Compared to conventional imaging, PSMA PET has moderately high sensitivity and specificity for detecting intraprostate tumors and moderately high sensitivity for detecting regional and extra-pelvic metastases. PSMA PET can also play an important role in detecting extra-prostatic disease before surgery and can guide surgical planning. In addition, PSMA PET has proven to be an effective tool for a definitive radiotherapy plan for patients who have not responded to treatment. Therefore, the diagnostic accuracy and impact on treatment of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) im-aging in the initial staging of prostate cancer (PCa) were reviewed. We conclude that PSMA positron emission computed tomography is effective in imaging initial PCa and can help patients modify treatment.
文章引用:孙静宜, 秦永德. PSMA PET/CT和PET/MRI在前列腺癌初始分期中的作用[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(2): 4467-4473. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2024.142620

参考文献

[1] Eapen, R.S., Nzenza, T.C., Murphy, D.G., Hofman, M.S., Cooperberg, M. and Lawrentschuk, N. (2019) PSMA PET Applications in the Prostate Cancer Journey: From Diagnosis to Theranostics. World Journal of Urology, 37, 1255- 1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Ugai, T., Sasamoto, N., Lee, H.-Y., et al. (2022) Is Early-Onset Cancer an Emerging Global Epidemic? Current Evidence and Future Implications. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 19, 656-673.
[3] Filella, X. and Foj, L. (2018) Novel Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer Detection and Prognosis. In: Schatten, H., Ed., Cell & Molecular Biology of Prostate Cancer, Springer, Cham, 15-39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 华俊, 宋彦平, 杨媛媛, 等. 前列腺特异性膜抗原PET/CT对中高危前列腺癌初始TNM分期及临床治疗策略的影响[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2022, 49(16): 828-833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Catalona, W.J., Richie, J.P., Ahmann, F.R., et al. (2017) Comparison of Digital Rectal Examination and Serum Prostate Specific Antigen in the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Clinical Trial of 6630 Men. Journal of Urology, 197, S200-S207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Stabile, A., Giganti, F., Rosenkrantz, A.B., et al. (2020) Multipar-ametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Current Status and Future Directions. Nature Reviews Urology, 17, 41-61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Mohler, J.L., Armstrong, A.J., Bahnson, R.R., et al. (2016) Pros-tate Cancer, Version 1.2016. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 14, 19-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Parekh, D.J., Punnen, S., Sjoberg, D.D., et al. (2015) A Mul-ti-Institutional Prospective Trial in the USA Confirms that the 4Kscore Accurately Identifies Men with High-Grade Pros-tate Cancer. European Urology, 68, 464-470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Tosoian, J.J., Druskin, S.C., Andreas, D., et al. (2017) Use of the Prostate Health Index for Detection of Prostate Cancer: Results from a Large Academic Practice. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 20, 228-233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Dalela, D., Löppenberg, B., Sood, A., Sammon, J. and Abdollah, F. (2016) Contemporary Role of the Decipher ® Test in Prostate Cancer Management: Current Practice and Future Perspec-tives. Reviews in Urology, 18, 1-9.
[11] Xu, M.J., Kornberg, Z., Gadzinski, A.J., et al. (2019) Genomic Risk Predicts Molecular Imaging-Detected Metastatic Nodal Disease in Prostate Cancer. European Urology Oncology, 2, 685-690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Futterer, J.J., Briganti, A., De Visschere, P., et al. (2015) Can Clin-ically Significant Prostate Cancer be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature. European Urology, 68, 1045- 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Kasivisvanathan, V., Rannikko, A.S., Borghi, M., et al. (2018) MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. The New England Journal of Medicine, 378, 1767-1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Schoots, I.G., Roobol, M.J., Nieboer, D., Bangma, C.H., Steyerberg, E.W. and Hunink, M.G. (2015) Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy May Enhance the Di-agnostic Accuracy of Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Compared to Standard Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European Urology, 68, 438-450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Wibulpolprasert, P., Raman, S.S., Hsu, W., et al. (2020) Influ-ence of the Location and Zone of Tumor in Prostate Cancer Detection and Localization on 3-T Multiparametric MRI Based on PI-RADS Version 2. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 214, 1101-1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Ahdoot, M., Wilbur, A.R., Reese, S.E., et al. (2020) MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 382, 917-928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Weinreb, J.C., Barentsz, J.O., Choyke, P.L., et al. (2016) PI-RADS Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. European Urology, 69, 16-40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Westphalen, A.C., McCulloch, C.E., Anaokar, J.M., et al. (2020) Variability of the Positive Predictive Value of PI-RADS for Prostate MRI across 26 Centers: Experience of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-Focused Panel. Radiology, 296, 76-84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Turkbey, B., Rosenkrantz, A.B., Haider, M.A., et al. (2019) Pros-tate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Ver-sion 2. European Urology, 76, 340-351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Gupta, R.T., Mehta, K.A., Turkbey, B. and Verma, S. (2020) PI-RADS: Past, Present, and Future. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 52, 33-53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] McClure, T.D., Margolis, D.J.A., Reiter, R.E., et al. (2012) Use of MR Imaging to Determine Preservation of the Neurovascular Bundles at Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy. Radi-ology, 262, 874-883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Schiavina, R., Bianchi, L., Borghesi, M., et al. (2018) MRI Displays the Prostatic Cancer Anatomy and Improves the Bundles Management before Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Journal of Endourology, 32, 315-321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Hegde, J.V., Demanes, D.J., Veruttipong, D., et al. (2017) Pretreat-ment 3T Multiparametric MRI Staging Predicts for Biochemical Failure in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Com-bination High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and External Beam Radiotherapy. Brachytherapy, 16, 1106-1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Tan N, Shen L, Khoshnoodi P, et al. (2018) Pathological and 3 Tesla Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Correlation with Whole Mount Histopathology. Journal of Urology, 199, 1218-1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Van Der Leest, M., Israel, B., Cornel, E.B., et al. (2019) High Di-agnostic Performance of Short Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-Naïve Men: The Next Step in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accessibility. European Urology, 76, 574-581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Obmann, V.C., Pahwa, S., Tabayayong, W., et al. (2018) Diag-nostic Accuracy of a Rapid Biparametric MRI Protocol for Detection of Histologically Proven Prostate Cancer. Urology, 122, 133-138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Fraum, T.J., Ludwig, D.R., Kim, E.H., Schroeder, P., Hope, T.A. and Ippolito, J.E. (2018) Prostate Cancer PET Tracers: Essentials for the Urologist. The Canadian Journal of Urology, 25, 9371-9383.
[28] Werner, R.A., Derlin, T., Lapa, C., et al. (2020) 18F-Labeled, PSMA-Targeted Radio-tracers: Leveraging the Advantages of Radiofluorination for Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging. Theranostics, 10, 1-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Eiber, M., Weirich, G., Holzapfel, K., et al. (2016) Simultaneous 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET/MRI Improves the Localization of Primary Prostate Cancer. European Urology, 70, 829-836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Hicks, R.M., Simko, J.P., Westphalen, A.C., et al. (2018) Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI Compared with Multiparametric MRI in the Detection of Prostate Cancer. Radiology, 289, 730-737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Park, S.Y., Zacharias, C., Harrison, C., et al. (2018) Gallium 68 PSMA-11 PET/MR Imaging in Patients with Intermediate-or High-Risk Prostate Cancer. Radiology, 288, 495-505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Satapathy, S., Singh, H., Kumar, R. and Mittal, B.R. (2021) Diag-nostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for Initial Detection in Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenologyl, 216, 599-607.
[33] Cysouw, M.C.F., Jansen, B.H.E, Van De Brug, T., et al. (2021) Machine Learning-Based Analysis of [18F]DCFPyL PET Radiomics for Risk Stratification in Primary Prostate Cancer. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 48, 340-349.
[34] Maurer, T., Gschwend, J.E., Rauscher, I., et al. (2016) Diagnostic Efficacy of 68Gallium-PSMA Positron Emission Tomography Compared to Conventional Imaging for Lymph Node Staging of 130 Consecutive Patients with Intermediate to High Risk Prostate Cancer. Journal of Urology, 195, 1436-1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Van Leeuwen, P.J., Emmett, L., Ho, B., et al. (2017) Prospective Evaluation of 68Gallium-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Preoperative Lymph Node Staging in Prostate Cancer. BJU International, 119, 209-215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Kim, S.J., Lee, S.W. and Ha, H.K. (2019) Diagnostic Performance of Radi-olabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Lymph Node Staging in Newly Diagnosed Intermediate to High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urologia Internationalis, 102, 27-36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Nandurkar, R., Van Leeuwen, P., Stricker, P., et al. (2019) 68Ga-HBEDD PSMA-11 PET/CT Staging Prior to Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients: Diagnostic and Predictive Value for the Biochemical Response to Surgery. British Journal of Radiology, 92, Article 20180667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Brauchli, D., Singh, D., Chabert, C., Somasundaram, A. and Collie, L. (2020) Tumour-Capsule Interface Measured on 18F-DCFPyL PSMA Positron Emis-sion Tomography/CT Imaging Comparable to Multi-Parametric MRI in Predicting Extra-Prostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer at Initial Staging. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology, 64, 829-838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Donswijk, M.L., Van Leeuwen, P.J., Vegt, E., et al. (2020) Clinical Impact of PSMA PET/CT in Primary Prostate Cancer Compared to Conventional Nodal and Distant Staging: A Retro-spective Single Center Study. BMC Cancer, 20, Article No. 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]