曼陀罗–自性模型的情绪、生理唤醒特点
Emotional and Physiological Arousal of Mandala-Self Model
摘要: 目的:研究曼陀罗–自性模型的情绪与生理唤醒特点。方法:呈现不同水平曼陀罗模型后,让被试评定情绪唤醒强度,并由MP150生理仪记录生理特点。结果:1) 情绪唤醒上,五种水平的曼陀罗情绪唤醒的程度存在显著差异;2) 生理水平上,对立水平与超越水平曼陀罗的皮肤电、心率显著高于其他水平;3) 情绪唤醒上,抑郁组的安全感、平和感及舒畅性强度显著低于正常组;4) 生理水平上,抑郁组的皮温显著低于正常组。结论:曼陀罗–自性模型具有较好的评估功能。
Abstract:
Objective: To study emotional and physiological arousal of the mandala-self model. Methods: Emotional arousal was evaluated after five levels of mandala-self model and MP150 was used for recording physiological characteristics. Results: 1) The degree of emotional arousal was different at five levels of mandala-self model; 2) Electro dermal level and heart rate at sacred and opposite levels of mandala-self model were significantly higher than other levels; 3) At emotional arousal, the depression group was significantly lower than the normal group in sense of security, peace and comfort intensity; 4) The depression group was significantly lower than normal group in skin temperature at physiological level. Conclusion: Mandala-self model can be used as an evaluation tool.
参考文献
[1]
|
陈灿锐, 申荷永(2011). 荣格及后荣格学派的自性观. 心理学探新, 5期, 391-396.
|
[2]
|
陈灿锐(2012). 曼陀罗的特性、功能及应用. 华南师范大学博士论文, 42-50.
|
[3]
|
陈灿锐, 周党伟, 高艳红(in press). 曼陀罗绘画改善情绪效果研究. 中国临床心理学杂志.
|
[4]
|
胡治国, 刘宏艳, 张学新(2008). 情绪冲突: 一个新的研究主题. 心理科学进展, 5期, 692-698.
|
[5]
|
李英(2009a). 观音意象的心理分析研究. 华南师范大学博士论文, 78-92.
|
[6]
|
李英, 席敏娜, 申荷永(2009b). 正念禅修在心理治疗和医学领域中的应用. 心理科学, 2期, 397-398.
|
[7]
|
刘庆英, 冯正直(2009). 抑郁症的整合情绪记忆模型述评. 心理科学进展, 5期, 938-943.
|
[8]
|
王振宏, 郭德俊, 游旭群, 高培霞(2007). 身体攻击行为学生自主神经活动的情绪唤醒特点. 心理学报, 2期, 277-284.
|
[9]
|
Andersona, I. M., Sarsfielda, A., & Haddadb. P. M. (2009). Efficacy, safety and tolerability of quetiapine augmentation in treatment resistant depression: An open-label, pilot study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 117, 116-119.
|
[10]
|
Colman, W. (2006). The self, in the handbook of Jungian psychology. London: Roufledge, 162-163.
|
[11]
|
Curry, N. A., & Kasser, T. (2005). Can coloring mandalas reduce anxiety? Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 22, 81-85.
|
[12]
|
Frame, P. (2006). Assessing a couple’s relationship and compatibility using the MARI® Card Test and mandala drawings. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 23, 23-29.
|
[13]
|
Huyser, A. (2002). Madala workbook for inner self-discovery. Boston: Binkey Kok Publications, 60.
|
[14]
|
Kellogg, J., Margare, M. R., & Helen, L. (1977). The use of the mandala in psychological evaluation and treatment. American Journal of Art Therapy, 16, 123-134.
|
[15]
|
Kim, S. I., Bae, J., & Lee, Y. (2007). A computer system to rate the color-related formal elements in art therapy assessments. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 34, 223-237.
|
[16]
|
Kim, S. I., Kang, H. S., & Kim, Y. H. (2009). A computer system for art therapy assessment of elements in structured mandala. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 36, 19-28.
|
[17]
|
Pisarik, C. T., & Larson, K. R. (2011). Facilitating college students’ authenticity and psychological well-being through the use of mandalas: An empirical study. The Journal of Humanistic Counseling, 50, 84-98.
|