曼陀罗–自性模型的情绪、生理唤醒特点
Emotional and Physiological Arousal of Mandala-Self Model
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2013.32014, PDF, HTML, XML,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 陈灿锐*：广州医学院卫管学院心理系；高艳红：华南师范大学心理学院
关键词: 曼陀罗–自性模型；抑郁；生物反馈；心理治疗；Mandala-Self Model; Depression; Biofeedback; Psychotherapy
摘要: 目的：研究曼陀罗–自性模型的情绪与生理唤醒特点。方法：呈现不同水平曼陀罗模型后，让被试评定情绪唤醒强度，并由MP150生理仪记录生理特点。结果：1) 情绪唤醒上，五种水平的曼陀罗情绪唤醒的程度存在显著差异；2) 生理水平上，对立水平与超越水平曼陀罗的皮肤电、心率显著高于其他水平；3) 情绪唤醒上，抑郁组的安全感、平和感及舒畅性强度显著低于正常组；4) 生理水平上，抑郁组的皮温显著低于正常组。结论：曼陀罗–自性模型具有较好的评估功能。
Abstract: Objective: To study emotional and physiological arousal of the mandala-self model. Methods: Emotional arousal was evaluated after five levels of mandala-self model and MP150 was used for recording physiological characteristics. Results: 1) The degree of emotional arousal was different at five levels of mandala-self model; 2) Electro dermal level and heart rate at sacred and opposite levels of mandala-self model were significantly higher than other levels; 3) At emotional arousal, the depression group was significantly lower than the normal group in sense of security, peace and comfort intensity; 4) The depression group was significantly lower than normal group in skin temperature at physiological level. Conclusion: Mandala-self model can be used as an evaluation tool.
文章引用：陈灿锐, 高艳红 (2013). 曼陀罗–自性模型的情绪、生理唤醒特点. 心理学进展, 3(2), 90-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2013.32014

参考文献

[1] 陈灿锐, 申荷永(2011). 荣格及后荣格学派的自性观. 心理学探新, 5期, 391-396.
[2] 陈灿锐(2012). 曼陀罗的特性、功能及应用. 华南师范大学博士论文, 42-50.
[3] 陈灿锐, 周党伟, 高艳红(in press). 曼陀罗绘画改善情绪效果研究. 中国临床心理学杂志.
[4] 胡治国, 刘宏艳, 张学新(2008). 情绪冲突: 一个新的研究主题. 心理科学进展, 5期, 692-698.
[5] 李英(2009a). 观音意象的心理分析研究. 华南师范大学博士论文, 78-92.
[6] 李英, 席敏娜, 申荷永(2009b). 正念禅修在心理治疗和医学领域中的应用. 心理科学, 2期, 397-398.
[7] 刘庆英, 冯正直(2009). 抑郁症的整合情绪记忆模型述评. 心理科学进展, 5期, 938-943.
[8] 王振宏, 郭德俊, 游旭群, 高培霞(2007). 身体攻击行为学生自主神经活动的情绪唤醒特点. 心理学报, 2期, 277-284.
[9] Andersona, I. M., Sarsfielda, A., & Haddadb. P. M. (2009). Efficacy, safety and tolerability of quetiapine augmentation in treatment resistant depression: An open-label, pilot study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 117, 116-119.
[10] Colman, W. (2006). The self, in the handbook of Jungian psychology. London: Roufledge, 162-163.
[11] Curry, N. A., & Kasser, T. (2005). Can coloring mandalas reduce anxiety? Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 22, 81-85.
[12] Frame, P. (2006). Assessing a couple’s relationship and compatibility using the MARI® Card Test and mandala drawings. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 23, 23-29.
[13] Huyser, A. (2002). Madala workbook for inner self-discovery. Boston: Binkey Kok Publications, 60.
[14] Kellogg, J., Margare, M. R., & Helen, L. (1977). The use of the mandala in psychological evaluation and treatment. American Journal of Art Therapy, 16, 123-134.
[15] Kim, S. I., Bae, J., & Lee, Y. (2007). A computer system to rate the color-related formal elements in art therapy assessments. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 34, 223-237.
[16] Kim, S. I., Kang, H. S., & Kim, Y. H. (2009). A computer system for art therapy assessment of elements in structured mandala. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 36, 19-28.
[17] Pisarik, C. T., & Larson, K. R. (2011). Facilitating college students’ authenticity and psychological well-being through the use of mandalas: An empirical study. The Journal of Humanistic Counseling, 50, 84-98.