不同牡丹品种生物学特性比较研究
Comparative Studies on Biological Characteristic of Different Peony Cultivars
DOI: 10.12677/HJAS.2018.86088, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 冉 烈:重庆文理学院林学与生命科学学院,重庆 永川;李会合*:重庆文理学院特色植物研究院,重庆
关键词: 牡丹品种生物学特性光合特性Peony Variety Biological Characteristics Photosynthetic Characteristics
摘要: 以6个不同牡丹品种(太平红、玉楼紫、肉芙蓉、金腰楼、彭州紫、凤丹白)为研究对象,对其生物学特性和光合特性进行了比较研究。结果表明:不同品种牡丹均具有较高的观赏价值,生长规律总体一致;玉楼紫株高最高,彭州紫最低,太平红、玉楼紫和彭州紫均为重瓣花。光合特性研究结果表明,金腰楼和玉楼紫净光合速率最高,凤丹白最低;气孔导度和胞间CO2浓度的变化一致,变化顺序为玉楼紫 > 金腰楼 > 彭州紫 > 肉芙蓉 > 太平红 > 丹凤白;玉楼紫和金腰楼以及彭州紫蒸腾速率都较高。
Abstract: The biological and photosynthetic characteristics were comparatively studied in six peony cultivars (Taipinghong, Yulouzi, Roufurong, Jinyaolou, Pengzhouzi, Danfengbai). The results showed that the all peony cultivars possessed high ornamental values and growth regularity was consistent with each other; plant height of Yulouzi peony was the tallest; that of Pengzhouzi peony was opposite. Taipinghong Yulouzi and Pengzhouzi peonies had multiplicate flower. Net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of Jinyaolou and Yulouzi peony was higher than others, and that of Fengdanbai peony was the lowest. The changes of stomata conductance (Gs) and intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (Ci) were uniform, which is Yulouzi > Jinyaolou > Pengzhouzi > Roufurong > Taipinghong > Danfengbai. The transpiration rate (Tr) of Yulouzi Jinyaolou and Pengzhouzi peony was higher than others.
文章引用:冉烈, 李会合. 不同牡丹品种生物学特性比较研究[J]. 农业科学, 2018, 8(6): 574-578. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJAS.2018.86088

参考文献

[1] 黄海霞, 侯宇清. 不同品种牡丹抗氧化能力与其多酚黄酮含量的关系研究[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2010, 21(11): 2921-2923.
[2] 李百健, 曾荣, 黄长干, 等. 植物杀菌剂的筛选[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 32(10): 28-31.
[3] 黄海霞, 付强, 陈晓, 等. 牡丹根提取液抗氧化作用的研究[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2010, 22(4): 885-886.
[4] 邓才富, 申明亮, 易思荣. 垫江牡丹生产现状调查研究[J]. 中国现代中药, 2007, 9(6): 37-39.
[5] Deyersa, Ghan-nouno, Nicotraa, et al. (2007) High Temperature Acclimation of C4 Photosynthesis Is Linked to Change in Photosynthetic. Bi-ochemistry Plant, Cell & Environment, 30, 53-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 陈月华, 廖建华, 覃事妮. 长沙地区19种园林植物光合特性及固碳释氧测定[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2012, 32(10): 13-15.
[7] 范俊安, 张艳, 夏永鹏, 等. 重庆垫江牡丹皮生产历史与生产现状分析[J]. 中药材, 2006, 29(4): 401-403.
[8] 赵海军. 牡丹春节催花技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2002: 13-14.
[9] Otieno, D.O., Schmidt, M.W., Asiku, S., et al. (2005) Physiological and Morphological Responses to Water Stress in Two Acacia Species from Contrasting Habitats. Tree Physiology, 25, 361-371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Farquhar, G.D. and Sharkey, T.D. (1982) Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 33, 317-345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 刘玉英. 中原牡丹品种生物学及形态特性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京林业大学园林植物与观赏园艺, 2010.
[12] 申明亮, 邓才富, 易思荣, 等. 重庆垫江牡丹生物学特性研究[J]. 中国现代中药, 2009, 10(11): 8-11.
[13] 石颜通, 张秀新, 薛璟祺, 等. 四个催花牡丹品种复壮栽培后光合特性比较[J]. 华北农学报(增刊), 2013, 28(s1): 172-176.
[14] 许芳, 张定宇, 黄春国, 等. 矮壮牡丹生物学研究进展及其保护措施[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(27): 11716-11717.
[15] Virginie, B. and Lejeune-Henaut, I. (2003) Cold Accli-mation of Winter and Spring Peas: Carbon Partitioning as Affected by Light Intensity. European Journal of Agriculture, 19, 535-548.
[16] 翟敏, 李永华, 杨秋生. 盆栽和地栽牡丹光合特性的比较[J]. 园艺学报, 2008, 35(2): 251-256.
[17] 权伟, 余少娜, 康华靖, 等. 菏泽牡丹引种温州光合特性研究[J]. 林业科技开发, 2011, 1(15): 60-63.