面孔识别中脑电成分P1,N170和N250的民族特征反应
The Ethnic Characteristic Reaction of EEG Components P1, N170 and N250 in Face Recognition
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2020.1012225, PDF,   
作者: 岳亚奇:石河子大学,新疆 石河子
关键词: 面孔识别P1N170N250异族效应Face Perception N170 P1 N250 Other Race Effect
摘要: 目的:为了调查面孔识别中的脑电成分P1,N170,N250是否能够准确的反映出面孔的民族特征,本研究设计了专门检测面孔民族特征信息的实验范式进行探究。方法:选取31名大学生作为被试,采用“平均面孔”以凸显民族信息,改变“平均面孔”的变形程度操纵被试对该特征信息的判断,同时记录被试的脑电与行为数据。结果:对被试反应时间数据的方差分析显示出变形水平的主效应十分显著F(6,174) = 25,P < 0.001, ηp2=0.46。被试民族与目标面孔民族交互作用显著F(1,29) = 8.7,P = 0.006, 。脑电结果显示同族与异族面孔所引起的P1,N170波幅差异并不显著t(30) = 1.70,p = 0.09;t(30) = 1.87,P = 0.07,而N250波幅差异十分显著t(30) = 2.84,P = 0.01。结论:面孔识别中早期的脑电成分P1,N170成分对面孔的民族特征并不敏感,N250成分对不同民族面孔的特征信息具有良好的检出性。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate whether the eeg components P1, N170 and N250 in face recognition can accurately reflect the ethnic characteristics of faces. In this study, an experimental paradigm spe-cifically designed to detect the ethnic characteristics of faces was designed to explore. Methods: Thirty-one college students were selected as subjects, and “average face” was used to highlight na-tional information, and the deformation degree of “average face” was changed to manipulate the judgment of the characteristic information. Meanwhile, eeg and behavioral data of the subjects were recorded. Results: The variance analysis of the reaction time data showed that the main effect of deformation level was very significant: F(6,174) = 25, P < 0.001, ηp2=0.46 . The participants’ ethnicity had significant interaction with the target face ethnicity (F(1,29) = 8.7, p = 0.006, and  ). The eeg results showed that the amplitude of P1, N170 caused by homologous and alien faces was not significantly different t(30) = 1.70, P = 0.09. t(30) = 1.87, P = 0.07, and N250 amplitude difference is very significant t(30) = 2.84, P = 0.01, d = 0.47. Conclusion: In the early stage of face recognition, components P1 and N170 are not sensitive to the ethnic characteristics of faces, while N250 has a good ability to detect the characteristic information of faces of different ethnic groups.
文章引用:岳亚奇 (2020). 面孔识别中脑电成分P1,N170和N250的民族特征反应. 心理学进展, 10(12), 1931-1938. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2020.1012225

参考文献

[1] 李诸洋, 韩仁生, 刘璐(2014). 面孔加工的结构编码阶段异族效应的加工方式: ERPs研究. 心理科学, 37(6), 1308-1312.
[2] 彭小虎, 罗跃嘉, 卫星, 王国锋, 魏景汉(2003). 东西方面孔异族效应机理的电生理学证据. 心理学报, 35(1), 50-55.
[3] Bindemann, M., Burton, A. M., Leuthold, H., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2008). Brain Potential Correlates of Face Recognition: Geometric Distortions and the N250 Brain Response to Stimulus Repetitions. Psychophy-siology, 45, 535-544.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Boehm, S. G., & Sommer, W. (2005). Neural Correlates of Intentional and Incidental Recognition of Famous Faces. Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 153-163.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Caldara, R., Rossion, B., Bovet, P., & Hauert, C. A. (2004). Event-Related Potentials and Time Course of the “Other-Race” Face Classification Advantage. NeuroReport, 15, 905-910.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Caldara, R., Thut, G., Servoir, P., Michel, C. M., Bovet, P., & Renault, B. (2003). Face versus Non-Face Object Perception and the “Other-Race” Effect: A Spatio-Temporal Event-Related Potential Study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 515-528.[CrossRef
[7] Colombatto, C., & McCarthy, G. (2017). The Effects of Face Inversion and Face Race on the P100 ERP. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29, 664-676.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Hahn, A. C., Jantzen, K. J., & Symons, L. A. (2012). Thatcherization Impacts the Processing of Own-Race Faces More So than Other-Race Faces: An ERP Study. Social Neuroscience, 7, 113-125.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Herrmann, M. J., Schreppel, T., Jager, D., Koehler, S., Ehlis, A. C., & Fallgatter, A. J. (2007). The Other-Race Effect for Face Perception: An Event-Related Potential Study. Journal of Neural Transmission, 114, 951-957.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Hugenberg, K., Miller, M., & Claypool, M. (2010). Categorization and Individuation in the Cross-Race Recognition Deficit: Toward a Solution to an Insidious Problem. Journal of Experi-mental Social Psychology, 43, 334-340.[CrossRef
[11] Hugenberg, K., Wilson, J. P., See, P. E., & Young, S. G. (2013). Towards a Synthetic Model of Own Group Biases in Face Memory. Visual Cognition, 21, 1392-1417.[CrossRef
[12] Hugenberg, K., Young, S. G., Bernstein, M. J., & Sacco, D. F. (2010). The Categorization-Individuation Model: An Integrative Account of the Other-Race Recognition Deficit. Psycho-logical Review, 117, 1168-1187.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Kim, S., & Yang, S. C. (2016). Memory-Based Attentional Capture by Colour and Shape Contents in Visual Working Memory. Visual Cognition, 24, 51-62.[CrossRef
[14] McKone, E., Crookes, K., & Kanwisher, N. (2009). The Cog-nitive and Neural Development of Face Recognition in Humans. Cognitive Neurosciences, 4, 240-255.
[15] Meadows, C. C., Gable, P. A., Lohse, K. R., & Miller, L. B. (2016). The Effects of Reward Magnitude on Reward Processing: An Av-eraged and Single Trial Event-Related Potential Study. Biological Psychology, 118, 154-160.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty Years of In-vestigating the Own-Race Bias in Memory for Faces: A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 3-35.[CrossRef
[17] Mercure, E., Dick, F., & Johnson, M. H. (2008). Featural and Configural Face Processing Differentially Modulate ERP Components. Brain Research, 1239, 162-170.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Rossion, B., & Caharel, S. (2011). ERP Evidence for the Speed of Face Categorization in the Human Brain: Disentangling the Contribution of Low-Level Visual Cues from Face Perception. Vision Research, 51, 1297-1311.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Schweinberger, S. R., & Neumann, M. F. (2016). Repetition Effects in Human ERPs to Faces. Cortex, 80, 141-153.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Senholzi, K. B., & Ito, T. A. (2013). Structural Face Encoding: How Task Affects the N170’s Sensitivity to Race. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 937-942.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Stahl, J., Wiese, H., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2008). Expertise and Own-Race Bias in Face Processing: An Event-Related Potential Study. NeuroReport, 19, 583-587.[CrossRef
[22] Stahl, J., Wiese, H., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2010). Learning Task Affects ERP-Correlates of the Own-Race Bias, but Not Recognition Memory Performance. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2027-2040.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Tanaka, J. W., & Pierce, L. J. (2009). The Neural Plas-ticity of Other-Race Face Recognition. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 122-131.[CrossRef
[24] Vizioli, L., Foreman, K., Rousselet, G. A., & Caldara, R. (2010). Inverting Faces Elicits Sensitivity to Race on the N170 Component: A Cross-Cultural Study. Journal of Vision, 10, 15.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Walker, P. M., Silvert, L., Hewstone, M., & Nobre, A. C. (2008). Social Contact and Other-Race Face Processing in the Human Brain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3, 16-25.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Wuttke, S. J., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2019). The P200 Predominantly Reflects Distance-to-Norm in Face Space Whereas the N250 Reflects Activation of Identity-Specific Representations of Known Faces. Biological Psychology, 140, 86-95.[CrossRef] [PubMed]