《年龄与发育进程问卷：社交–情绪》3~5岁幼儿简化问卷的编制与信效度检验
Development and Reliability and Validity Test of the “Age & Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional” Simplified Version for Children Aged from 3 to 5 Years Old
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.1310587, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 钟 渊, 刘少英*, 姚 蓨：浙江理工大学心理学系，浙江 杭州；詹建英：杭州市妇产科医院儿童保健科，浙江 杭州
关键词: 幼儿；社交–情绪发展；信度；效度；简化；Young Children； Social-Emotional Development； Reliability； Validity； Simplification
摘要: 目的：为提高幼儿社交–情绪发展风险监测效率，解决适用于相关基层人员预警工具缺乏的现状问题，本研究对36、48、60月龄组的《年龄与发育进程问卷：社交–情绪》(第2版)进行简化，并验证简化问卷的信效度。方法：采用方便取样，在杭州市6所公立幼儿园抽取1521名3~5岁幼儿，M ± SD = 51.76 ± 8.34月，男821例，女700例，由其父母完成《年龄与发育进程问卷：社交–情绪》(第2版)。其中，依据4种经典测量学方法对原问卷简化，并进行简化问卷的信度检验、评估简化问卷的结构及校标效度。结果：简化问卷有6个题项，信效度均可被接受。其中校标效度的特异性及敏感性较良好，临界值为17.5分，风险结果与原问卷中等一致。结论：3~5岁幼儿《年龄与发育进程问卷：社交–情绪》简化问卷符合心理学筛查问卷评估要求，该量表内容简洁，筛查用时少，能提高筛查效率，适用于广大基层保健工作者、托幼机构教师进行快速风险预警。
Abstract: Objective: To enhance the efficiency of monitoring children’s social-emotional development and address the current issue of the absence of suitable early warning tools for grass-roots personnel, this study has simplified the “Age & Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional” (version 2) for 36-, 48- and 60-month-old, and verified its reliability and validity. Methods: By using convenient sampling, 1521 children aged 3~5, with a mean age of months and a standard deviation of 51.76 ± 8.34 months, 821 male and 700 female were chosen. Their parents filled out the “Age & Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional” (version 2). This was simplified according to four classical measurement methods, and the reliability, construct validity and criterion validity of the simplified questionnaire was tested. Results: The simplified questionnaire comprises 6 items, and its reliability and validity are acceptable. The calibration standard’s specificity and sensitivity are satisfactory, the cut-off value being 17.5, with the risk results coinciding with the original questionnaire. Conclusion: The “Age & Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional” for children aged 3~5 years is suitable for primary health care workers and teachers in nursery institutions to conduct rapid risk warning, as it meets the evaluation requirements of psychological screening questionnaire. The content of the scale is simple and the screening time is short, thus improving the screening efficiency.
文章引用：钟渊, 刘少英, 姚蓨, 詹建英 (2023). 《年龄与发育进程问卷：社交–情绪》3~5岁幼儿简化问卷的编制与信效度检验. 心理学进展, 13(10), 4659-4666. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2023.1310587

参考文献

[1] 卞晓燕, Squires Jane, 卢红梅, 等(2021). 年龄与发育进程问卷: 社会-情绪(第2版)的中国常模及信度研究. 中国儿童保健杂志, 29(1), 23-27+51.
[2] 陈卫中, 潘晓平, 宋兴勃, 等(2006). Roc曲线中最佳工作点的选择. 中国卫生统计, 23(2), 157-158.
[3] 顾海根, 李超(2005). 同质信度多种指标的比较研究. 心理科学, 28(5), 1196-1198.
[4] 郭轶斌, 郭威, 秦宇辰, 等(2016). 基于Kappa系数的一致性检验及其软件实现. 中国卫生统计, 33(1), 169-170+174.
[5] 郝元涛, 孙希凤, 方积乾, 等(2004). 量表条目筛选的统计学方法研究. 中国卫生统计, 21(4), 209-211.
[6] 黄小娜, 张悦, 冯围围, 等(2017). 儿童心理行为发育问题预警征象筛查表的信度效度评估. 中华儿科杂志, 55(6), 445-450.
[7] 刘仕祺, 武元, 边旸, 等(2016). 《年龄与发育进程问卷》中文版在高危儿童发育筛查中效度验证. 中国循证儿科杂志, 11(6), 436-440.
[8] 卢平, 喻茜, 韩霞, 等(2018). 昆山市婴幼儿早期社交情绪问题的现况分析. 现代预防医学, 45(18), 3320-3322+3332.
[9] 茅范贞, 韩耀风, 方亚(2015). 量表条目的统计学筛选方法研究进展. 现代预防医学, 42(1), 1-3.
[10] 宁亚飞, 刘春玲(2017). 幼儿接纳量表第二版的修订及信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(5), 859-862.
[11] 张虎, 田茂峰(2007). 信度分析在调查问卷设计中的应用. 统计与决策, 1(21), 25-27.
[12] 张悦, 黄小娜, 王惠珊, 等(2018). 中国儿童心理行为发育问题预警征编制及释义. 中国儿童保健杂志, 26(1), 112-114+116.
[13] 张永花, 常锐霞, 张婧洁, 等(2018). 社交-情绪问卷评估学龄前儿童社交情绪能力的调查结果分析. 中国初级卫生保健, 32(7), 32-33.
[14] 赵旭艳, 张世泽(2017). 大学生无聊倾向问卷修编. 重庆高教研究, 5(2), 75-81.
[15] 庄云珠, 万崇华, 杨铮, 等(2022). 基于经典测量理论与项目反应理论的药物成瘾生命质量测定量表QLICD-DA(V2.0)条目分析. 现代预防医学, 49(5), 778-782.
[16] Eurenius, E., Richter Sundberg, L., Vaezghasemi, M. et al. (2019). Social-Emotional Problems among Three-Year-Olds Differ Based on the Child’s Gender and Custody Arrangement. Acta Paediatrica, 108, 1087-1095.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Squires, J., Bricker, D., & Potter, L. W. (1997). Revision of a Parent-Completed Development Screening Tool: Ages and Stages Questionnaires. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 22, 313-328.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Squires, J., Bricker, D., Twombly, E. et al. (2015). ASQ: SE-2’ User’s Guide. Brookes Publishing Co.
[19] Xie, H., Bian, X., Chen, C.-Y., Squires, J., & Lu, P. (2019). Examining the Convergent Evidence of a Parent-Completed, Social-Emotional Screening Tool in China. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 1471-1480.[CrossRef]