初中英语教材词汇层级设计合理性对比分析——基于人教版与北师大版的实证研究
Comparative Analysis of the Rationality of Vocabulary Hierarchy Design in Junior High School English Textbooks—Empirical Research Based on the People’s Education Edition and Beijing Normal University Edition
摘要: 教材在英语教学中占有重要地位,而词汇作为语言材料教学的基本单位,其难度设置将直接影响学生的学和教师的教。本研究选取了人教版和北师大版两套具有代表性的初中英语教材,对比分析两套教材词表词汇中二三级基本词汇所占的比例;然后运用统计分析法,对两个版本教材词表词汇中所属二三级词汇的词性、音节构成量进行卡方检测对比分析,归纳分析两套教材在各年级词汇层级安排上存在的差异显著性和合理性;最后通过研究对比发现两套教材词汇层级设计存在的合理性及不足。
Abstract: The textbooks play an important role in English teaching, and vocabulary, as the basic unit of language material teaching, its difficulty setting will directly affect students’ learning and teachers’ teaching. This study selected two representative junior high school English textbooks, the People’s Education Press and the Beijing Normal University Press, and compared and analyzed the proportion of basic vocabulary in the vocabulary of the second and third levels in the two textbooks; Then, using statistical analysis method, a chi square test was conducted to compare and analyze the part of speech and syllable composition of the second and third level vocabulary in the vocabulary tables of the two versions of the textbook. The significance and rationality of the differences in the arrangement of vocabulary levels in each grade in the two sets of textbooks were summarized and analyzed; Finally, through research and comparison, it was found the rationality and shortcomings in the vocabulary hierarchy design of the two textbooks.
文章引用:刘敏. 初中英语教材词汇层级设计合理性对比分析——基于人教版与北师大版的实证研究[J]. 教育进展, 2024, 14(5): 553-564. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2024.145733

参考文献

[1] Lewis, M. (1993) The Lexical Approach. Language Teaching Publications, Hove.
[2] Nation, I.S.P. (2011) Research into Practice: Vocabulary. Language Teaching, 44, 529-539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Nation, P. (2022) Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. In: Hinkel, E., Ed., Handbook of Practical Second Language Teaching and Learning, Routledge, London, 397-408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Wagner-Gough, J. and Hatch, E. (1975) The Importance of Input Data in Second Language Acquisition Studies. Language Learning, 25, 297-308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Nation, I.S.P. (1990) Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. Heinle & Heinle Publishers, Boston.
[6] Elley, W.B. (1991) Acquiring Literacy in a Second Language: The Effect of Book-Based Programs. Language Learning, 41, 375-411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Laufer, B. (1991) The Development of L2 Lexis in the Expression of the Advanced Learner. The Modern Language Journal, 75, 440-448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 刘静. 北师大版新旧初中英语教材的对比[J]. 基础教育课程, 2014(8): 21-27.
[9] 李秋菊. 初中英语教科书中文化内容的选择和分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 首都师范大学, 2013.
[10] 杨康珑. 人教版Go for it初中英语教材与北师大版JHE初中英语教材人物角色对比分析[J]. 时代教育, 2016(13): 250, 258.
[11] 邱雅群. 语用信息在人教版初中教材和北师大版初中教材中的呈现[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 杭州师范大学, 2019.
[12] 吴梦瑶. 基于语料库的初中英语教材文本难度对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 银川: 北方民族大学, 2021.
[13] 何舒曼, 李庆燊. 我国初中英语教材词汇因素研究——基于三套教材的统计与分析[J]. 教学与管理, 2013(4): 41-43.
[14] 陈怡. 仁爱版和人教版初中英语教材的对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2016.
[15] 邵雨萍. 两套初中英语教材对比评价——《牛津英语(沪教版)》和《Go for it! (人教版)》[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2018.
[16] 黎小雨. 基于语料库的初中英语教材词汇分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2018.
[17] 敬敏. 仁爱版和人教版初中英语教材对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 重庆师范大学, 2021.
[18] 宋平. 英语词义的认知释解[J]. 海外英语, 2020(12): 30-32.
[19] Krashen, S.D. (1982) Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
[20] 栾明霞. 浅析单词音节划分方法对高中英语教学的影响[J]. 新课程导学, 2016(22): 40.