信号抑制假说中的抑制效应与目标特征增强效应
Inhibition Effect and Target Feature Enhancement Effect in Signal Suppression Hypothesis
摘要: 有限的注意资源无法将外界的各种刺激全部接收,需要对其进行选择。除了传统的刺激驱动理论和目标驱动理论对其进行解释,还有将二者结合起来进行分析的信号抑制假说。信号抑制假说认为,显著干扰物会产生“注意我”的信号试图捕获注意,如果显著刺激与任务要求不符,这个信号就会被自上而下的注意控制抑制,注意捕获便不会真正发生。近年来已有行为证据和电生理证据给信号抑制假说提供了支持,证明显著刺激确实可以被主动抑制,但是依旧无法明确其中的抑制效应和目标特征增强效应各自发挥多少作用。未来还需要进一步研究以区分在视觉注意捕获和非视觉因素的参与下两个效应的作用,适用范围等。
Abstract: Limited attention resources cannot receive all kinds of stimuli from the outside world, so it is necessary to choose them. In addition to the traditional stimulus-driven theory and goal-driven theory to explain it, there is a signal inhibition hypothesis which combines the two theories. The signal suppression hypothesis holds that significant distracters will produce “notice me” signals in an attempt to capture attention. If significant stimuli are inconsistent with task requirements, this signal will be suppressed by top-down attention control, and attention capture will not ac-tually occur. In recent years, behavioral evidence and electrophysiological evidence have pro-vided support for the signal inhibition hypothesis, proving that significant stimuli can indeed be actively suppressed, but it is still unclear how much role the inhibitory effect and target feature enhancement effect play respectively. In the future, further studies are needed to distinguish the role and scope of application of the two effects in visual attention capture and the participation of non-visual factors.
文章引用:梁杰璇. 信号抑制假说中的抑制效应与目标特征增强效应[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2023, 12(8): 4302-4309. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2023.128587

参考文献

[1] 张明, 王爱君. 视觉搜索中基于工作记忆内容的注意捕获与抑制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012(12): 1899-1907.
[2] Theeuwes, J. (2004) Top-Down Search Strategies Cannot Override Attentional Capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 65-70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Theeuwes, J., de Vries, G.J. and Godijn, R. (2003) Attentional and Oculomotor Capture with Static Singletons. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 735-746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Folk, C.L., Remington, R.W. and Johnston, J.C. (1992) Involuntary Covert Orienting Is Contingent on Attentional Control Settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Folk, C.L., Remington, R.W. and Wright, J.H. (1994) The Structure of Attentional Control: Contingent Attentional Capture by Apparent Motion, Abrupt Onset and Color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 317-329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Folk, C.L. and Remington, R. (1998) Selectivity in Distraction by Irrelevant Featural Singletons: Evidence for Two Forms of Attentional Capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847-858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Hickey, C., Di Lollo, V. and McDonald, J.J. (2009) Electrophysiological Indices of Target and Distractor Processing in Visual Search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 760-775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Theeuwes, J. (2010) Top-Down and Bottom-Up Control of Visual Selection. Acta Psychologica, 135, 77-99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Yantis, S. (1993) Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture and Attentional Control Settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 676-681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Yantis, S. and Hillstrom, A.P. (1994) Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture: Evidence from Equiluminant Visual Objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 95-107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Wolfe, J.M. (2007) Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress with a Model of Visual Search. In: Gray, W.D., Ed., Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems, Oxford University Press, New York, 99-119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Johnston, J.C., Ruthruff, E. and Lien, M.C. (2015) Visual Information Processing from Multiple Displays. Human Factors, 57, 276-297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Gaspelin, N., Leonard, C.J. and Luck, S.J. (2015) Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-But-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs. Psychological Science, 26, 1740-1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 张帆, 陈艾睿, 董波, 王爱君, 张明. 视觉注意捕获的快速脱离假说与信号抑制假说[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 45-55.
[15] Gaspelin, N., Margett-Jordan, T. and Ruthruff, E. (2015) Susceptible to Distraction: Children Lack Top-Down Control over Spatial Attention Capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22, 461-468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Bichot, N.P. (2005) Parallel and Serial Neural Mechanisms for Visual Search in Macaque Area V4. Science, 308, 529-534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Ipata, A.E., Gee, A.L., Gottlieb, J., Bisley, J.W. and Goldberg, M.E. (2006) LIP Responses to a Popout Stimulus Are Reduced If It Is Overtly Ignored. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1071-1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Gaspelin, N., Leonard, C.J. and Luck, S.J. (2017) Suppression of Overt Attentional Capture by Salient-But-Irrelevant Color Singletons. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 79, 45-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Sawaki, R. and Luck, S.J. (2010) Capture versus Suppression of Attention by Salient Singletons: Electrophysiological Evidence for an Automatic Attend-to-Me Signal. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 72, 1455-1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Gaspar, J.M. and McDonald, J.J. (2014) Suppression of Salient Objects Prevents Distraction in Visual Search. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 5658-5666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Moher, J. and Egeth, H.E. (2012) The Ignoring Paradox: Cueing Distractor Features Leads First to Selection, Then to Inhibition of to-Be-Ignored Items. Attention Perception and Psychophysics, 74, 1590-1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Zehetleitner, M., Goschy, H. and Müller, H.J. (2012) Top-Down Control of Attention: It’s Gradual, Practice-Dependent and Hierarchically Organized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 941-957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Vatterott, D.B. and Vecera, S.P. (2012) Experience-Dependent Attentional Tuning of Distractor Rejection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19, 871-878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Gaspelin, N. and Luck, S.J. (2018b) Distinguishing among Potential Mechanisms of Singleton Suppression Distinguishing among Potential Mechanisms of Singleton Suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44, 626-644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Wyble, B., Callahan-Flintoft, C., Chen, H., Marinov, T., Sarkar, A. and Bowman, H. (2020) Understanding Visual Attention with RAGNAROC: A Reflexive Attention Gradient through Neural AttRactOr Competition. Psychological Review, 127, 1163-1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Feldmann-Wüstefeld, T., Busch, N.A. and Schubö, A. (2020) Failed Suppression of Salient Stimuli Precedes Behavioral Errors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32, 367-377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Chang, S., Cunningham, C.A. and Egeth, H.E. (2019) The Power of Negative Thinking: Paradoxical But Effective Ignoring of Salient-But-Irrelevant Stimuli with a Spatial Cue. Visual Cognition, 27, 199-213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Gaspelin, N., Gaspar, J.M. and Luck, S.J. (2019) Oculomotor Inhibition of Salient Distractors: Voluntary Inhibition Cannot Override Selection History. Visual Cognition, 27, 227-246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Chang, S. and Egeth, H.E. (2020) Can Salient Stimuli Really Be Suppressed? Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 83, 260-269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Duncan, J. and Humphrey, G.W. (1989) Visual Search and Stimulus Similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Nothdurft, H.C. (1993) The Role of Features in Preattentive Vision: Comparison of Orientation, Motion and Color Cues. Vision Research, 33, 1937-1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Theeuwes, J. (1991) Cross-Dimensional Perceptual Selectivity. Perception and Psychophysies, 50, 184-193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Anderson, B.A., Laurent, P.A. and Yantis, S. (2011) Value-Driven Attentional Capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 10367-10371.
[34] Pearson, D., Watson, P., Cheng, P.X. and Le Pelley, M.E. (2020) Overt Attentional Capture by Reward-Related Stimuli Overcomes Inhibitory Suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46, 489-501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Berridge, K.C. and Robinson, T.E. (1998) What Is the Role of Dopamine in Reward: Hedonic Impact, Reward Learning, or Incentive Salience? Brain Research Reviews, 28, 309-369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[36] Bacon, W.F. and Egeth, H.E. (1994) Overriding Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 485-496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[37] Grégoire, L., Britton, M.K. and Anderson, B.A. (2020) Motivated Suppression of Value- and Threat-Modulated Attentional Capture. Emotion, 22, 780-794.
[38] Feldmann-Wüstefeld, T., Brandhofer, R. and Schubö, A. (2016) Rewarded Visual Items Capture Attention Only in Heterogeneous Contexts. Psychophysiology, 53, 1063-1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Wang, B. and Theeuwes, J. (2020) Salience Determines Attentional Orienting in Visual Selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46, 1051-1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Jannati, A., Gaspar, J.M. and McDonald, J.J. (2013) Tracking Target and Distractor Processing in Fixed-Feature Visual Search: Evidence from Human Electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1713-1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Franconeri, S.L. and Simons, D.J. (2003) Moving and Looming Stimuli Capture Attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 999-1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[42] Gaspelin, N., Ruthruff, E., Lien, M.C. and Jung, K. (2012) Breaking through the Attentional Window: Capture by Abrupt Onsets versus Color Singletons. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 74, 1461-1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Jonides, J. and Yantis, S. (1988) Uniqueness of Abrupt Visual Onset in Capturing Attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 346-354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef