成都地区一次重度雾霾过程的数值模拟研究
Study on the Numerical Simulation of a Heavy Smoggy Weather over Chengdu Region Based on WRF-Chem Model
摘要:
采用新一代区域空气质量预报模式(WRF-Chem V3.9)对2017年1月22~28日发生在成都地区的重度雾霾过程进行研究。将模拟结果中的2米气温(T2)、PM2.5质量浓度指数和AQI评分与观测数据进行对比;同时对比模拟结果中包含和不包含化学过程的结果,探讨大气化学过程对雾霾过程的影响,得出以下结论:1) WRF-Chem模拟的2米气温日变化幅度小于实测值3℃,日均值比实测值低2.5℃,在低温日,模拟结果与观测更为接近;2) PM2.5的模拟值较观测偏低80;3) AQI模拟值日变化特征明显,但较实测值偏低50;4) 相较于不包含大气化学过程的模拟,包含大气化学过程的模拟使模式中心站气温偏低0.5℃,边界层高度降低55 m,表明大气化学过程有利于温度降低,边界层高度降低,增加了大气稳定度,促使近地层污染物浓度进一步增加,反映了大气化学过程与污染物浓度的正反馈关系。
Abstract:
This paper used the new generation of regional air quality model Weather Research and Forecasting with Chemistry V3.9 (WRF-Chem V3.9) to study on a heavy smoggy weather over Chengdu region from January 22 to January 28, 2017. After comparing the simulated results with observation data of 2 m temperature (T2), PM2.5 and AQI, the atmospheric chemical processes of smog were further discussed by comparing the results with and without chemical processes. The conclusions were as following: 1) The daily variation of the simulated T2 was less than the observed T2 by 3˚C. The daily mean T2 was 2.5˚C lower than the observed T2. In cold days, the result of simulated T2 was better. 2) The simulated value of PM2.5 was lower than the observed values by 80. 3) The daily variation of simulated AQI was obvious, but it was 50 lower than the observed data. 4) With chemical processes, the T2 of simulation center station was 0.5˚C lower, and the planetary boundary layer height (PBLH) was reduced by 55 m. It showed that the atmospheric chemical processes was conducive to the reduction of temperature, the reduction of the PBLH, and the increase of atmospheric stability, leading to the increase of pollutants concentration. In other words, the results reflected the positive feedback relationship between the atmospheric chemical processes and the concentration of pollutants.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
郭晓梅. 四川盆地空气质量气候特征及其大地形影响效应的观测模拟研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京信息工程大学, 2016.
|
|
[2]
|
邓利群, 钱骏, 廖瑞雪, 等. 2009年8-9月程度市颗粒物污染及其与气象条件的关系[J]. 中国环境科学, 2012, 32(8): 1433-1438.
|
|
[3]
|
张颖, 刘志红, 吕晓彤, 等. 四川盆地一次污染过程的WRF模式参数化方案最优配置[J]. 环境科学学报, 2016, 36(8): 2819-2826.
|
|
[4]
|
姚琳, 叶芝祥, 等. 成都市空气质量预报中WRF的本地化参数选取[J]. 成都信息工程学院学报, 2012, 27(5): 485-489.
|
|
[5]
|
马欣, 陈东升, 温维, 等. 应用WRF-Chem探究气溶胶污染对区域气象要素的影响[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2016, 42(2): 285-295.
|
|
[6]
|
Lin, Y., et al. (1983) Bulk Parameterization of the Snow Field in a Cloud Model. Journal of Ap-plied Meteorology and Climatology, 22, 1065-1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
Rutledge, S.A. and Hobbs, P.V. (1984) The Mesoscale and Microscale Structure and Organization of Clouds and Precipitation in Midlatitude Cyclones. XII: A Diagnostic Model-ing Study of Precipitation Development in Narrow Cloud-Frontal Rainbands. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20, 2949-2972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
杜川利, 唐晓, 李星敏, 等. 城市边界层高度变化特征与颗粒物浓度影响分析[J]. 高原气象, 2014, 33(5): 1383-1392.
|
|
[9]
|
周广强, 谢英, 等. 基于WRF-Chem模式的华东区域PM2.5预报及偏差原因[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36(8): 2251-2259.
|
|
[10]
|
朱育雷, 倪长健, 崔蕾. 成都市污染边界层高度的演变特征分析[J]. 环境工程, 2017, 35(1): 98-102.
|
|
[11]
|
张小玲, 夏祥鳌, 车慧正, 等. 区域污染对本底地区气溶胶光学特性强迫影响的地基和卫星遥感观测研究[J]. 环境科学, 2014, 35(7): 2439-2448.
|