新冠疫情防控期高密度城市中央公园社会服务效能研究——以澳门氹仔中央公园为例
Research on the Social Service Effectiveness of Central Park in High-Density City during the COVID-19 Epidemic Prevention and Control—Taking the Macau Taipa Central Park as an Example
摘要: 高密度城市的中央公园是城市居民日常休闲游憩的重要场所。如何通过科学合理的公园规划建设实现较高的社会服务效能以满足日益增长的居住人口需求,是城市规划建设和经营管理者面临的现实挑战。本文选取位于澳门高密度城区内的氹仔中央公园为研究对象,通过对新冠疫情防控期间公园游人活动情况的观察调研,运用定性与定量相结合的分析方法,探究城市公园社会服务效能的评价指标和运营绩效。研究表明,澳门氹仔中央公园社会服务效能可用公园利用率、游园便利度和游客满意度三个指标进行评估,该公园在新冠疫情防控期间运行稳定,社会服务效能优良;相关规划建设指标和防疫管理措施可为国内外同类高密度城市公共开放空间建设管理工作提供借鉴。
Abstract: The urban central park in a high-density city is an important place for urban residents’ daily leisure and recreation. How to achieve high social service efficiency through scientific, reasonable park planning and construction to meet the needs of the growing residential population is a realistic challenge faced by urban planning, construction and management personnel. This article selects Taipa Central Park as the research object which located in the high-density urban area of Macau. Through the observation and investigation of visitors’ activities in the park during the prevention and control of the COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control, combining the qualitative and quantitative analysis method to explore the evaluation indicators and social service effectiveness of urban parks. Research result shows that the social service effectiveness of Taipa Central Park can be mainly reflected in three indicators to evaluate: Park Utilization, Park Service Convenience, and Tourist Satisfaction. Taipa Central Park has been operating stably during the COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control, which means Taipa Central Park’s social service effectiveness is excellent. As a result, the related planning and construction indicators and epidemic prevention management measures of Taipa Central Park can provide reference for the construction and management of public open space in similar high-density urban areas in the world.
文章引用:李济泰, 李敏. 新冠疫情防控期高密度城市中央公园社会服务效能研究——以澳门氹仔中央公园为例[J]. 现代管理, 2021, 11(9): 996-1009. https://doi.org/10.12677/MM.2021.119125

参考文献

[1] 郑红英. 基于网络分析的城市公园可达性研究[J]. 城市建设, 2011(11): 68-69.
[2] 叶昌东, 赵晓铭, 张媛媛. 基于人口指标与路网指标的绿地可达性比较研究——以广州中心城区为例[J]. 中国园林, 2016(7): 115-120.
[3] 尹海伟, 孔繁花, 宗跃光. 城市绿地可达性与公平性评价[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(7): 3375-3383.
[4] Nicholls, S. (2008) Measuring the Accessibility and Equity of Public Parks: A Case Study Using GIS. Managing Leisure, 6, 201-219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] 李博, 宋云, 俞孔坚. 城市公园绿地规划中的可达性指标评价方法[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 44(4): 618-624.
[6] 翟宇佳, 周聪惠. 基于实例的城市公园可达性评价模型比较[J]. 中国园林, 2019, 35(1): 78-83.
[7] 周春山, 江海燕, 高军波. 城市公共服务社会空间分异的形成机制——以广州市公园为例[J]. 城市规划, 2013, 37(10): 84-89.
[8] 胡玥, 蔡永立. 城市公园社会服务空间公平性的定量分析——以上海市中心城区为例[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017(1): 91-103+112.
[9] 吴健生, 沈楠. 基于步行指数的深圳市福田区公园绿地社会服务功能研究[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(22): 7483-7492.
[10] 李敏, 叶昌东. 高密度城市的门槛标准及全球分布特征[J]. 世界地理研究, 2015, 24(1):38-45.
[11] 李敏. 城市绿地系统与人居环境规划[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1999.