摘要: 近年来，自动化行政的概念在行政执法领域越来越受关注，其中交警非现场执法作为一种半自动化行政模式，因其与公众生活紧密联系，而受到广泛关注。交警非现场执法具有程序化，非接触化的特质，虽然有效提高了行政执法效率，但也给相对人的知情权、参与权、救济权等程序性权利保障带来挑战。在我国，围绕交警非现场执法已有了一套相对完整的理论框架和顶层设计，但对于行政相对人的程序性权利保障研究还不够深入透彻。尽管现有研究已突出了法律与技术交融的重要性问题，但对于如何从多个角度全方位地评估非现场执法活动的影响，尚未进行充分探讨。因此本研究将在法治框架内，融入技术与社会伦理学科的观点，以补充法律领域内的空白，目的在于进一步明确界定交警非现场执法的法律边界、程序及技术规范，以确保行政相对人程序性权利得到充分的法律保障。

Abstract: In recent years, the concept of automatic administration has attracted more and more attention in the field of administrative law enforcement. Among them, off-site law enforcement, as a semi-automatic administrative mode of traffic police has been widely concerned because of its close connection with public life. The off-site law enforcement of traffic police has the characteristics of procedural and non-contact. Although it effectively improves the efficiency of administrative law enforcement, it also brings challenges to the protection of procedural rights such as the right to know, right to participation and right to relief. In China, there is a set of a relatively complete theoretical framework and top-level design around the off-site law enforcement of traffic police, but the research on the protection of procedural rights of administrative counterparts is not thorough enough. While existing research has highlighted the importance of the integration of law and technology, there has not been sufficient exploration of how to comprehensively evaluate the impacts of off-site law enforcement activities from multiple perspectives. Therefore, this research will integrate the views of technology and social ethics into the framework of the rule of law to supplement the gaps in the legal field. The purpose is to further clearly define the legal boundaries, procedures and technical norms of the off-site law enforcement of traffic police, so as to ensure that the procedural rights of administrative counterparts are fully guaranteed by law.