电子商务平台上“刷单炒信”行为的刑法规制研究
Research on the Criminal Law System of “Swiping Orders and Speculating on Credit” on E-Commerce Platforms
摘要: “刷单炒信”行为与刷单行为的界分是清晰“刷单炒信”行为性质的应有之义,通过对“刷单炒信”行为与刷单行为的界定把握住刑法规制的“刷单炒信”行为的本质。“刷单炒信”行为刑法规制的正当性需要法益侵害性方面、刑法谦抑性方面、民法与行政法规制手段不足方面的分析与论证。“刷单炒信”行为原有刑事规制路径有其弊端,完善“刷单炒信”行为的刑法规制应当从规制路径统一、入罪数额标准科学以及认定边界清晰三个方面进行着手。
Abstract: The distinction between “swiping and speculating” and swiping is to clarify the proper meaning of the nature of “swiping and speculating”, and grasp the essence of the “swiping and speculating” behavior under the criminal law through the definition of “swiping and speculating” and swiping behavior. The legitimacy of the criminal law system of “swiping orders and speculating on credit” requires analysis and demonstration in terms of the infringement of legal interests, the modesty of criminal law, and the inadequacy of civil law and administrative law systems. Improving the criminal legal system for “swiping and speculating on credit” should be carried out from three aspects: the unification of the regulatory path, the scientific standard of the amount of guilt, and the clear boundaries of determination.
文章引用:汤昌兴. 电子商务平台上“刷单炒信”行为的刑法规制研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(2): 2855-2862. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.132350

参考文献

[1] 许丹璨. 网络刷单诈骗犯罪刑事侦查研究[J]. 黑龙江人力资源和社会保障, 2021(19): 125-127.
[2] 刘旭红. 电商平台规范刷单炒信不正当竞争行为的对策研究——以淘宝诉美名科技公司为例[J]. 中国商论, 2021(19): 70-72.
[3] 马永强. 正向刷单炒信行为的刑法定性与行刑衔接[J]. 法律适用, 2020(24): 63-78.
[4] 曹波, 陈娟. 反向刷单炒信刑法规制新解[J]. 时代法学, 2019, 17(6): 34-42.
[5] 宋源宁, 徐成. 网络购物中刷单行为的法律规制及刑法适用[J]. 黑龙江工业学院学报(综合版), 2019, 19(10): 101-106.
[6] 李宛真. 我国反不正当竞争法对互联网刷单炒信行为的法律规制[J]. 中国商论, 2019(14): 242-244.
[7] 王华伟. 刷单炒信的刑法适用与解释理念[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2018(6): 95-111.
[8] 高艳东. 信息时代非法经营罪的重生-组织刷单案评析[J]. 中国法律评论, 2018(2): 146-153.
[9] 叶良芳. 刷单炒信行为的规范分析及其治理路径[J]. 法学, 2018(3): 177-191.
[10] 刘雪丹. 全国首例刷单炒信案定性之追问[J]. 中国检察官, 2017(18): 26-29.
[11] 练育强. 行政执法与刑事司法衔接困境与出路[J]. 政治与法律, 2015(11): 135-148.