电商网络平台数据的法律保护机制研究
The Research on the Legal Protection Mechanism of Data on E-Commerce Network Platforms
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2024.1341489, PDF,   
作者: 黄世杰:浙江理工大学法政学院、史量才新闻与传播学院,浙江 杭州
关键词: 电商网络平台数据保护法律保护机制场景化E-Commerce Network Platforms Data Protection Legal Protection Mechanisms Scenario-Based
摘要: 电商网络平台的兴起正是互联网时代下,电商网络媒体不断向网络空间扩张的结果。由于平台数据具有非排他性、利益交织性等特点,电商网络平台持有的数据在权属和利用上都争论不休,仍然无法解决不同权利主体之间利益的冲突与平衡。以赋权方式保护电商网络平台数据财产利益与既有的物权、债权、知识产权体系难以相容。而新型数据财产权学说仍然强调电商网络平台对于数据的支配性,仍然无法解决此问题。平台数据的法律保护机制是一种共赢机制的设计,需要将个人、平台、社会利益纳入考虑框架。在平台对于数据的处理流程中,数据之上的人格利益与财产利益的保护程度是不同的,考虑到平台数据具有非排他性、利益交织性等特点,从利益角度界定与保护平台数据财产更具有理论基础和现实意义,因此应当建立一种阶段化和场景化的保护路径。
Abstract: The rise of e-commerce network platforms is precisely the result of the continuous expansion of e-commerce network media into cyberspace in the Internet era. Due to the non-exclusivity and intertwined interests of platform data, the data held by e-commerce network platforms have been debated on both ownership and utilization, and it is still not possible to resolve the conflict and balance of interests between different rights holders. The protection of e-commerce network platform data property interests by empowerment is incompatible with the established property rights, claims and intellectual property rights system. The new data property rights doctrine still emphasizes the dominance of the e-commerce network platform over the data, and still fails to solve this problem. The legal protection mechanism of platform data is the design of a win-win mechanism, which needs to include the interests of individuals, platforms, and society into the consideration framework. In the platform’s data processing process, the degree of protection of personality interests and property interests over the data is different. Considering that the platform data has the characteristics of non-exclusivity and intertwined interests, defining and protecting the platform data property from the perspective of interests is more theoretically grounded and realistic, and therefore a stage-by-stage and scenario-based protection path should be established.
文章引用:黄世杰. 电商网络平台数据的法律保护机制研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(4): 3034-3042. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.1341489

参考文献

[1] 梅夏英. 数据的法律属性及其民法定位[J]. 中国社会科学, 2016(9): 164-183.
[2] 李爱君. 数据权利属性与法律特征[J]. 东方法学, 2018(3): 66-67.
[3] 闫立东. 以“权利束”视角探究数据权利[J]. 东方法学, 2019(2): 57-67.
[4] 龙卫球. 数据新型财产权构建及其体系研究[J]. 政法论坛, 2017(4): 63-77.
[5] 齐爱民, 周伟萌. 论计算机信息交易的法律性质[J]. 法律科学, 2010, 28(3): 118-119.
[6] 徐实. 企业数据保护的知识产权路径及其突破[J]. 东方法学, 2018(5): 55-62.
[7] 徐海燕, 袁泉. 论数据产品的财产权保护——评淘宝诉美景公司案[J]. 法律适用, 2018(20): 83-89.
[8] 许可. 数据保护的三重进路——评新浪微博诉脉脉不正当竞争案[J]. 上海大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(6): 15-27.
[9] 王利明. 数据共享与个人信息保护[J]. 现代法学, 2019, 41(1): 45-47.
[10] 申晨. 虚拟财产规则的路径重构[J]. 法学家, 2016(1): 87-88.
[11] 丁晓东. 数据到底属于谁?——从网络爬虫看平台数据权属与数据保护[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2019(5): 69-83.
[12] 何鋆灿. 数据权属理论场景主义选择——基于二元论之辩驳[J]. 信息安全研究, 2020, 6(10): 919-932.