全面注册制下审核问询回复函对IPO抑价的影响研究
Research on the Impact of Review Inquiry Response Letter on IPO Underpricing under the Full Registration System
摘要: 在我国资本市场全面实行注册制背景下,审核问询制度成为了对发行人进行信息披露审查的重要手段。本文基于此背景,选取2023年4月10日至2024年6月30日全面注册制下上海证券交易所首发上市的111家公司作为研究对象,应用文本分析技术,实证检验了审核问询回复函的质量以及语调对IPO抑价的影响。研究表明:第一,审核问询回复函的质量越高,IPO抑价越低。第二,审核问询回复函的语调越积极,IPO抑价越低。根据理论分析和实证研究的结果,本文对完善我国资本市场的审核问询制度提出了以下建议:一是建立多层级的问询问题库,针对不同行业、不同发展阶段的企业,设置标准化和个性化相结合的问题清单。二是加大信息披露违规的处罚力度,提高违规成本,切实保障信息披露质量。
Abstract: Under the background of the comprehensive implementation of the registration system in China’s capital market, the audit and inquiry system has become an important means to review the information disclosure of issuers. Based on this background, this paper selects 111 companies listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange from April 10, 2023 to June 30, 2024 under the full registration system as research objects, and applies text analysis technology to empirically test the impact of the quality and tone of audit inquiry response letters on IPO underpricing. The research shows that: first, the higher the quality of the audit inquiry response letter, the lower the IPO underpricing. Second, the more positive the tone of the review inquiry response letter, the lower the IPO underpricing. According to the results of theoretical analysis and empirical research, this paper puts forward the following suggestions to improve the audit and inquiry system of China’s capital market: First, establish a multi-level question bank, and set up a list of standardized and personalized questions for enterprises in different industries and different stages of development. The second is to increase the penalties for information disclosure violations, increase the cost of violations, and effectively ensure the quality of information disclosure.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Li, B. and Liu, Z. (2017) The Oversight Role of Regulators: Evidence from SEC Comment Letters in the IPO Process. Review of Accounting Studies, 22, 1229-1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
蒋尧明, 张雷云. 科创板审核问询函能提升关键事项信息披露水平吗[J]. 当代财经, 2021(9): 126-136.
|
|
[3]
|
石玉峰, 张冰妍, 张宗新. 科创板IPO审核问询能否提升资本市场信息效率?——基于股价同步性的文本分析视角[J]. 新金融, 2022(1): 42-49.
|
|
[4]
|
薛爽, 王禹. 科创板IPO审核问询回复函与首发抑价[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(4): 185-199.
|
|
[5]
|
陈运森, 邓祎璐, 李哲. 非处罚性监管具有信息含量吗?——基于问询函的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018(4): 155-171.
|
|
[6]
|
Loughran, T. and McDonald, B. (2013) IPO First-Day Returns, Offer Price Revisions, Volatility, and Form S-1 Language. Journal of Financial Economics, 109, 307-326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
汪昌云, 武佳薇, 孙艳梅, 甘顺利. 公司的媒体信息管理行为与IPO定价效率[J]. 管理世界, 2015, 31(1): 118-128.
|
|
[8]
|
林乐, 谢德仁. 分析师荐股更新利用管理层语调吗?——基于业绩说明会的文本分析[J]. 管理世界, 2017, 33(11): 125-145, 188.
|
|
[9]
|
Lowry, M., Michaely, R. and Volkova, E. (2020) Information Revealed through the Regulatory Process: Interactions between the SEC and Companies Ahead of Their IPO. The Review of Financial Studies, 33, 5510-5554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[10]
|
黄俊, 陈信元. 媒体报道与IPO抑价——来自创业板的经验证据[J]. 管理科学学报, 2013, 16(2): 83-94.
|