《新加坡调解公约》背景下和解协议在中国的执行机制研究
Research on the Enforcement Mechanism of Settlement Agreements in China under the Singapore Convention on Mediation
摘要: 《新加坡调解公约》建立了国际和解协议跨国直接执行机制,促进了国际商事争议解决的发展。但是《新加坡调解公约》中的和解协议直接执行制度与国内调解协议获得执行的制度差距过大;我国商事调解立法的严重缺位;我国有关虚假调解的法律规制不完善,导致《新加坡调解公约》难以和国内法进行衔接。我国向来重视调解的争端解决方式,应积极探索如何与《新加坡调解公约》进行制度衔接,完善中国的国际商事争议解决机制,促进我国的国际经贸发展。
Abstract: The Singapore Convention on Mediation establishes a cross-border direct enforcement mechanism for international settlement agreements, advancing international commercial dispute resolution. However, the Singapore Convention on Mediation faces challenges in aligning with China’s domestic legal framework due to significant gaps between its direct enforcement regime and China’s domestic mediation enforcement mechanisms, insufficient commercial mediation legislation, and inadequate legal regulations against fraudulent mediation. China, which has long prioritized mediation as a key dispute resolution approach, should proactively explore institutional alignment with the Singapore Convention on Mediation to enhance its international commercial dispute resolution system and promote international trade and economic development.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
陆一戈. 《新加坡调解公约》框架下的国际和解协议执行及我国回应[J]. 经贸法律评论, 2022(4): 18-38.
|
|
[2]
|
Chua, E. (2019) Enforcement of International Mediated Settlement Agreements in Asia: A Path Towards Convergence. Asian International Arbitration Journal, 15, 1-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
冯冬冬. 《新加坡调解公约》背景下中国国际商事调解协议执行机制的完善[J]. 国际法研究, 2023(2): 143-160.
|
|
[4]
|
唐琼琼. 《新加坡调解公约》背景下我国商事调解制度的完善[J]. 上海大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 36(4): 116-129.
|
|
[5]
|
段明. 《新加坡调解公约》的冲击与中国商事调解的回应[J]. 商业研究, 2020(8): 129-137.
|
|
[6]
|
刘沁予. 《新加坡调解公约》签署后我国商事调解员的任职资格[J]. 商事仲裁与调解, 2022(3): 113-131.
|
|
[7]
|
曹思骐. 《新加坡调解公约》框架下国际商事调解协议在我国执行问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2023.
|
|
[8]
|
王国华, 施长艳. 《新加坡公约》与中国国际商事调解机制的冲突及破解之道[J]. 中国海商法研究, 2023, 34(2): 37-48.
|