生成式人工智能服务提供者侵权责任探析
Analysis of Tort Liability of Generative Artificial Intelligence Service Providers
摘要: 数字经济飞速发展中,以ChatGPT为代表的生成式人工智能既为人类带来益处,也不可避免的为法律和伦理带来挑战。现阶段的技术水平下,生成式人工智能不能确立其法律主体地位,而应由其服务提供者承担法律责任。对服务提供者认定侵权责任,首先要确定其属于新型网络服务提供者,然后根据生成式人工智能的训练、生成和移除阶段分别适用过错推定原则、无过错责任原则、过错责任原则的归责原则。以相当因果关系认定服务提供者侵权的因果关系。在保护被侵权人利益的同时,为了鼓励创新,可对服务提供者提供保护措施,以受害人故意和不可抗力的免责事由和服务提供者尽到注意义务的减责事由进行保护,有利于科技创新的发展。
Abstract: In the rapid development of the digital economy, generative artificial intelligence represented by ChatGPT not only brings benefits to humanity but also inevitably poses challenges to law and ethics. At the current technological level, generative artificial intelligence cannot establish its legal subject status, and instead, its service providers should bear legal responsibility. To determine the tort liability of a service provider, it is first necessary to determine that it belongs to a new type of network service provider. Then, the principle of presumption of fault, the principle of no-fault liability, and the principle of fault liability should be applied respectively according to the training, generation and removal stages of generative artificial intelligence. Determine the causal relationship of the infringement by the service provider based on a considerable causal relationship. While protecting the interests of the infringed party, in order to encourage innovation, protective measures can be provided for service providers. Protection can be carried out based on the exemption grounds of the victim’s intentional act and inability to resist and the mitigation grounds of the service provider’s fulfillment of the duty of care, which is conducive to the development of scientific and technological innovation.
文章引用:侯剑桥. 生成式人工智能服务提供者侵权责任探析[J]. 争议解决, 2025, 11(7): 131-137. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2025.117223

参考文献

[1] 赵万一. 机器人的法律主体地位辨析——兼谈对机器人进行法律规制的基本要求[J]. 贵州民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018(3): 147-167.
[2] 杨立新. 用现行民法规则解决人工智能法律调整问题的尝试[J]. 中州学刊, 2018(7): 40-49.
[3] 陈吉栋. 论机器人的法律人格——基于法释义学的讨论[J]. 上海大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 35(3): 78-89.
[4] 谭佐财. ChatGPT的法律风险与治理路径[J]. 湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 26(3): 117-125.
[5] 袁佳音. 生成式人工智能服务提供者的侵权责任边界研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2024(9): 122-133.
[6] 张夏恒. ChatGPT的逻辑解构、影响研判及政策建议[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 44(5): 113-123.
[7] 徐伟. 生成式人工智能服务提供者侵权过错的认定[J]. 法学, 2024(7): 110-124.
[8] 徐伟. 生成式人工智能侵权中因果关系认定的迷思与出路[J]. 数字法治, 2023(3): 129-143.
[9] 梁远高. 生成式人工智能服务提供者侵权责任的场景化分类及归责认定[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2024, 41(5): 115-124.
[10] 徐伟. 论生成式人工智能服务提供者的法律地位及其责任——以ChatGPT为例[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2023, 41(4): 69-80.
[11] 徐伟. 生成式人工智能服务提供者侵权归责原则之辨[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2024, 30(3): 190-204.
[12] 王竹. 侵权公平责任论[M]. 北京: 中国人民法学出版社, 2021.