我国环境行政公益诉讼原告资格问题研究
Research on the Plaintiff Qualification of Environmental Administrative Public Interest Litigation in China
摘要: 在环境行政公益诉讼中,原告资格范围体现了司法权对于行政权力制约的力度和强度,是环境行政公益诉讼的核心问题。本文基于理论分析视角,依托利害关系说、公共信托理论及“私人检察总长”等学说,为公民、社会组织原告资格合法化寻求理论支撑。同时,梳理分析域外西方国家的理论经验,指出检察机关在自身诉讼能力方面的优势以及垄断行政公益诉讼诉权的缺陷,并且应当进一步拓展公民和社会组织等的诉权,以期构建多元化行政公益诉讼原告资格制度。
Abstract: In environmental administrative public interest litigation, the scope of plaintiff qualification reflects the strength and intensity of judicial power’s restriction on administrative power, which is the core issue of environmental administrative public interest litigation. Based on the perspective of theoretical analysis, this paper seeks theoretical support for the legalization of plaintiff qualification of citizens and social organizations, relying on the theories of interest relationship, public trust and “private attorney general”. At the same time, combing and analyzing the theoretical experience of foreign western countries, this paper points out the advantages of procuratorial organs in their own litigation ability and the defects of monopolizing the right of action in administrative public interest litigation, and should further expand the right of action of citizens and social organizations in order to build a diversified plaintiff qualification system in administrative public interest litigation.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张晓玲. 行政公益诉讼原告资格探讨[J]. 法学评论, 2005, 23(6): 134-141.
|
|
[2]
|
由佳田. “私人检察总长”理论对我国行政公益诉讼的借鉴意义[J]. 中国检察官, 2022(24): 77-88.
|
|
[3]
|
蔡守秋. 从环境权到国家环境保护义务和环境公益诉讼[J]. 现代法学, 2013, 35(6): 3-21.
|
|
[4]
|
张鲁萍. 检察机关提起环境行政公益诉讼功能定位与制度建构[J]. 学术界, 2018(1): 137-149.
|
|
[5]
|
白彦. 检察机关提起公益诉讼的现实困境与对策研究[J]. 法学杂志, 2016, 37(3): 98-104.
|
|
[6]
|
桂萍. 论我国环境行政公益诉讼制度的完善途径[J]. 新余学院学报, 2019, 24(6): 61-66.
|
|
[7]
|
曹树青. “怠于行政职责论”之辩——环保行政部门环境公益诉讼原告资格之论见[J]. 学术界, 2012(3): 109-115.
|
|
[8]
|
王作化, 喻怀峰, 刘霞. 作为客观诉讼的环境行政公益诉讼[J]. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 22(5): 104-116, 118.
|
|
[9]
|
丁晓军. 建构行政公益诉讼制度原告资格的思考[J]. 经济研究导刊, 2017(20): 191-192, 197.
|
|
[10]
|
陈珂. 环境行政公益诉讼中原告诉讼资格探析[J]. 安阳师范学院学报, 2015(4): 30-35.
|
|
[11]
|
陈姝. 建立环境行政公益诉讼制度探讨[J]. 人民司法(应用), 2017(10): 98-102.
|
|
[12]
|
黄辉. 检察机关提起环境行政公益诉讼的司法裁判标准研究[J]. 法学杂志, 2018, 39(8): 107-113.
|
|
[13]
|
张辉. 环境行政权与司法权的协调与衔接——基于责任承担方式的视角[J]. 法学论坛, 2019, 34(4): 143-151.
|