主观社会阶层对利他谎言的预测:互依自我的中介作用
The Prediction of Altruistic Lies by Subjective Social Class: The Mediating Role of the Interdependent Self
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2025.157417, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 林陶钰, 吴 嵩:深圳大学心理学院,广东 深圳
关键词: 利他谎言谎言主观社会阶层心理距离互依自我Altruistic Lies Lies Subjective Social Class Psychological Distance Interdependent Self
摘要: 谎言在自然界和人类社会中普遍存在,以往研究发现,主观社会阶层可以负向预测利他的谎言行为,这是由于低社会阶层个体更倾向于维持人际关系以抵御外在威胁。然而,以往研究并没有此结果可能存在的文化差异。因此本研究以中国文化下的个体作为研究对象,通过问卷法测量了被试的相关心理变量。研究考察了个体的主观社会阶层对利他谎言行为的预测作用,并探讨互依自我在其中的中介作用。研究结果发现主观社会阶层正向预测利他谎言的倾向,且互依自我在主观社会阶层与利他谎言的关系中起到了部分中介作用。
Abstract: Lies are pervasive in nature and human society, and previous research has found that subjective social class negatively predicts altruistic lying behavior, due to the fact that individuals from lower social classes are more inclined to maintain interpersonal relationships to defend against external threats. However, previous studies do not have the cultural differences that may exist in this result. Therefore, the present study was conducted with individuals from the Chinese culture, and the relevant psychological variables of the subjects were measured by questionnaire method. The study examined the role of an individual’s subjective social class in predicting altruistic lie behavior and explored the mediating role of the interdependent self in this. The results of the study found that subjective social class positively predicted the tendency of altruistic lying, and that the interdependent self played a partial mediating role in the relationship between subjective social class and altruistic lying.
文章引用:林陶钰, 吴嵩 (2025). 主观社会阶层对利他谎言的预测:互依自我的中介作用. 心理学进展, 15(7), 178-183. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.157417

参考文献

[1] 蔡頠, 吴嵩, 寇彧(2016). 权力对亲社会行为的影响: 机制及相关因素. 心理科学进展, 24(1), 120-131.
[2] 胡小勇, 李静, 芦学璋, 郭永玉(2014). 社会阶层的心理学研究: 社会认知视角. 心理科学, (6), 231-239.
[3] 芦学璋, 郭永玉, 李静(2014). 社会阶层与亲社会行为: 回报预期的调节作用. 心理科学, (5), 1212-1219.
[4] 王雪, 蔡頠, 封子奇, 吴嵩, 孙嘉卿, 金盛华(2014). 社会心理学视角下权力理论的发展与比较. 心理科学进展, 22(1), 139-149.
[5] 张宁, 张亭玉, 张雨青, 吴坎坎(2011). 中国人对说谎行为和谎言识别的信念及其群体差异. 人类工效学, 17(1), 31-35.
[6] Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of Subjective and Objective Social Status with Psychological and Physiological Functioning: Preliminary Data in Healthy, White Women. Health Psychology, 19, 586-592.[CrossRef
[7] Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., & Morris, M. L. (2000). The Relational-Interdependent Self-Construal and Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791-808.[CrossRef
[8] DePaulo, B. M., & Kashy, D. A. (1998). Everyday Lies in Close and Casual Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 63-79.[CrossRef
[9] DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in Everyday Life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979-995.[CrossRef
[10] Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Social Class, Power, and Selfishness: When and Why Upper and Lower Class Individuals Behave Unethically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 436-449.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Kaplar, M. E., & Gordon, A. K. (2004). The Enigma of Altruistic Lying: Perspective Differences in What Motivates and Justifies Lie Telling within Romantic Relationships. Personal Relationships, 11, 489-507.[CrossRef
[12] Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2009). Signs of Socioeconomic Status: A Thin-Slicing Approach. Psychological Science, 20, 99-106.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social Class, Solipsism, and Contextualism: How the Rich Are Different from the Poor. Psychological Review, 119, 546-572.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.[CrossRef
[15] Neto, F., & Mullet, E. (2004). Personality, Self‐Esteem, and Self‐Construal as Correlates of Forgivingness. European Journal of Personality, 18, 15-30.[CrossRef
[16] Penner., L. A., Dovidio., J. F., Piliavin., J. A., & Schroeder., D. A. (2005). Prosocial Behavior: Multilevel Perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365-392.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Piff, P. K. (2014). Wealth and the Inflated Self: Class, Entitlement, and Narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 34-43.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., Cheng, B. H., & Keltner, D. (2010). Having Less, Giving More: The Influence of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 771-784.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., Côté, S., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Keltner, D. (2012). Higher Social Class Predicts Increased Unethical Behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 4086-4091.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Pöhlmann, C., Carranza, E., Hannover, B., & Iyengar, S. S. (2007). Repercussions of Self-Construal for Self-Relevant and Other-Relevant Choice. Social Cognition, 25, 284-305.[CrossRef
[21] Rao, L., Han, R., Ren, X., Bai, X., Zheng, R., Liu, H. et al. (2011). Disadvantage and Prosocial Behavior: The Effects of the Wenchuan Earthquake. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 63-69.[CrossRef
[22] Serota, K. B., Levine, T. R., & Boster, F. J. (2010). The Prevalence of Lying in America: Three Studies of Self-Reported Lies. Human Communication Research, 36, 2-25.[CrossRef
[23] Singelis, T. M. (1994). The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591.[CrossRef
[24] Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463.[CrossRef] [PubMed]