股权代持执行异议之诉中外观主义的适用
The Application of the Appearance Doctrine in the Lawsuit against the Enforcement of the Shareholding Held on Behalf of Another
摘要: 股权代持导致股权的权利外观与真实权利状态不一致,在执行程序中隐名股东会提起执行异议之诉,在审理过程中,存在着隐名股东与实际股东债权人的利益冲突,外观主义作为解决权利真实状态与外观不一致的原则在该情形中适用,体现了法院对交易秩序的维护,降低了善意第三人的交易风险。
Abstract: The appearance of the equity rights is inconsistent with the real state of the rights held on behalf of the equity, and the anonymous shareholders will file an enforcement objection lawsuit during the enforcement procedure. In the course of the trial, there is a conflict of interest between the anonymous shareholder and the actual shareholder creditor, and the appearance doctrine is applied in this case as a principle to resolve the inconsistency between the true state and appearance of the right, which reflects the court’s maintenance of the transaction order and reduces the transaction risk of a bona fide third party.
文章引用:李茜娅. 股权代持执行异议之诉中外观主义的适用[J]. 争议解决, 2025, 11(8): 57-61. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2025.118244

参考文献

[1] 范建, 王建文. 商法总论[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2019: 45.
[2] 张勇健. 商事审判中适用外观主义原则的范围探讨与最高人民法院《关于适用〈中华人民共和国公司法〉若干问题的规定(三)》相关条文对照[J]. 法律适用, 2011(8): 23-26.
[3] 刘俊海. 论股权代持的法律性质和效力[J]. 河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 46(5): 130-142.
[4] 张亮, 孙恬静. 案外人执行异议之诉中债权人与隐名股东保护的价值衡量——兼论商事外观主义在强制执行程序中的运用边界[J]. 法律适用, 2021(8): 81-91.
[5] 谢坤怡. 实质抑或外观: 股权代持案外人执行异议之诉的裁判路径[J]. 中南法律评论, 2024: 166-186.
[6] 李晓倩. 案外人异议之诉中权益冲突的判准及其展开——以“股权代持”纠纷为中心[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2023(2): 147-159.
[7] 葛伟军. 股权代持的司法裁判与规范理念[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2020, 23(6): 123-136.
[8] 吴光荣. 论外观主义在民商事审判中的运用[J]. 法学家, 2023(3): 118-130+194.
[9] 肖建国, 庄诗岳. 论案外人异议之诉中足以排除强制执行的民事权益——以虚假登记财产的执行为中心[J]. 法律适用, 2018(15): 11-22.
[10] 俞志方, 杨永强. 代持股执行异议裁判的理论基础及规制路径分析[J]. 企业经济, 2020, 39(11): 147-154.