考虑汇流博弈的超高层建筑楼梯疏散模型研究
Research on Staircase Evacuation Modelling for Super High-Rise Buildings Considering Merging Game
DOI: 10.12677/mos.2025.148549, PDF,   
作者: 李向民, 冷予冰, 郭雪媛：上海市建筑科学研究院有限公司，上海市工程结构安全重点实验室，上海；葛明威, 房志明：上海理工大学管理学院，上海
关键词: 超高层建筑；疏散模型；元胞自动机；汇流博弈；Super High-Rise Building； Evacuation Model； Cellular Automata； Merging Game
摘要: 楼梯间汇流冲突行为是影响超高层建筑疏散效率的关键因素，准确模拟并重现超高层建筑楼梯疏散过程中的微观行为特征，对于缩短疏散时间、优化疏散策略至关重要。通过引入汇流博弈机制，构建考虑汇流博弈的超高层建筑楼梯疏散模型。以40层建筑为研究对象进行疏散模拟，对比高层与低层发生汇流的结果。结果表明：高层汇流场景疏散时间更长、冲突次数更多，表明了汇流位置的选择对于缓解人群拥堵现象具有显著影响。可通过调节人流密度分布、汇流冲突点位置及疏散路径容量实现拥堵缓解。
Abstract: Merging conflict behavior in stairwells is a key factor affecting the evacuation efficiency of super high-rise buildings. Accurately simulating and reproducing the microscopic behavioral characteristics during stair evacuation in super high-rise buildings is crucial for reducing evacuation time and optimizing evacuation strategies. By introducing the merging game mechanism, the super high-rise building staircase evacuation model considering the merging game is constructed. Meanwhile, the evacuation simulation is carried out with a 40-storey building, comparing the results of merging occurring in the higher floors with those in the lower floors. The results show that the evacuation time is longer and the number of conflicts is more in the merging of high floors scenario, indicating that the choice of mergence location has a significant impact on alleviating the crowd congestion phenomenon. Congestion relief can be achieved by adjusting the distribution of crowd density, the location of merging conflict points and the capacity of evacuation paths.
文章引用：李向民, 冷予冰, 葛明威, 房志明, 郭雪媛. 考虑汇流博弈的超高层建筑楼梯疏散模型研究[J]. 建模与仿真, 2025, 14(8): 76-82. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2025.148549

参考文献

[1] 马自强. 超高层城市综合体的设计特点[J]. 居舍, 2024(36): 85-88.
[2] 王冉. 超高层建筑火灾扑救难点和灭火救援战术重点分析与运用[J]. 工程建设与设计, 2024(19): 73-75.
[3] 陈彦继. 超高层建筑火灾扑救难点和灭火救援战术运用分析[J]. 水上安全, 2024(18): 116-118.
[4] Bai, W., Huo, Y., Zou, G.W. and Gao, Y. (2015) Simulation of Fire Evacuation in a High-Rise Office Building. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Singapore, 6-9 December 2015, 1704-1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Hokugo, A., Kubo, K. and Murozaki, Y. (1985) An Experimental Study on Confluence of Two Foot Traffic Flows in Staircase. Journal of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), 358, 37-43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Huang, Z., Fan, R., Fang, Z., Ye, R., Li, X., Xu, Q., et al. (2022) Performance of Occupant Evacuation in a Super High-Rise Building up to 583 M. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 589, Article 126643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Takeichi, N., Yoshida, Y., Sano, T., Kimura, T., Watanabe, H. and Ohmiya, Y. (2005) Characteristics of Merging Occupants in a Staircase. Fire Safety Science, 8, 591-598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Yu, H., Jiang, N., Li, M., Jia, X., Zhuang, Y., Yang, L., et al. (2024) New Insights into the Merging Behavior of Pedestrians: Quantification of Lane Competition Level. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 154, Article 106126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Zeng, Y., Song, W., Huo, F. and Vizzari, G. (2018) Modeling Evacuation Dynamics on Stairs by an Extended Optimal Steps Model. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 84, 177-189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Xu, X. and Song, W. (2009) Staircase Evacuation Modeling and Its Comparison with an Egress Drill. Building and Environment, 44, 1039-1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Qu, Y., Gao, Z., Xiao, Y. and Li, X. (2014) Modeling the Pedestrian’s Movement and Simulating Evacuation Dynamics on Stairs. Safety Science, 70, 189-201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] 郑霞忠, 田丹, 陈述. 考虑汇流过程的楼梯疏散模型研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2020, 40(5): 796-802.
[13] Sano, T., Ronchi, E., Minegishi, Y. and Nilsson, D. (2017) A Pedestrian Merging Flow Model for Stair Evacuation. Fire Safety Journal, 89, 77-89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Ibrahim, A.M., Venkat, I. and de Wilde, P. (2019) The Impact of Potential Crowd Behaviours on Emergency Evacuation: An Evolutionary Game-Theoretic Approach. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 22, Article 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Ibrahim, A.M., Venkat, I. and de Wilde, P. (2017) Uncertainty in a Spatial Evacuation Model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 479, 485-497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Heliövaara, S., Ehtamo, H., Helbing, D. and Korhonen, T. (2013) Patient and Impatient Pedestrians in a Spatial Game for Egress Congestion. Physical Review E, 87, Article 012802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Smith, R.A. (1995) Density, Velocity and Flow Relationships for Closely Packed Crowds. Safety Science, 18, 321-327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Fruin, J.J. (1971) Pedestrian Planning and Design. Metropolitan Association of Urban Designers & Environmental Planners.
[19] 葛明威, 房志明, 尤亚云, 等. 考虑体力消耗的三维超高层建筑疏散模型研究[J]. 建模与仿真, 2024, 13(6): 5922-5933.

为你推荐