明代西域贡使居留内地现象探析
Analysis of the Phenomenon of Western Regions’ Tribute Envoys Residing in the Interior during the Ming Dynasty
DOI: 10.12677/ojhs.2025.134037, PDF,   
作者: 杨 蓓:新疆大学历史学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐
关键词: 明代西域贡使居留内地Ming Dynasty Western Regions Tribute Envoys Residence in the Interior
摘要: 明朝建国以来,由于北元残余势力的压迫,统治者遣使招谕西域,以防止北元势力与西域诸国联合起来共同对抗明朝。西域诸国纷纷遣使来华朝贡,与明朝维持着朝贡往来。两百多年来,西域贡使往返于丝绸之路进行朝贡贸易,在明朝西北边疆政策中扮演着重要的角色,对明朝与西北边疆地区的政治、经济、文化交流做出重要贡献。同时,不少贡使进入明朝内地后长期居留内地,其在内地的活动加强了明朝与西域诸国之间的联系和民族之间的交流融合。但居留内地的贡使时常会做出一些有违明朝法律、禁令之事,对明朝官府、军民造成困扰和伤害。寓居内地的贡使不断融入当地社会生活,成为连接西域与中原的重要桥梁,对明代的社会文化产生了独特的影响。
Abstract: Since the founding of the Ming Dynasty, due to the threat posed by the remnants of the North Yuan, the imperial court dispatched envoys to appease the Western Regions to prevent potential alliances between the North Yuan and the Western Regions against the Ming. Consequently, states in the Western Regions sent tribute envoys to China, maintaining a tributary relationship with the Ming court. For over two centuries, these envoys traveled along the Silk Road to engage in tribute trade, playing a significant role in the Ming’s northwestern frontier policy and contributing substantially to political, economic, and cultural exchanges between the Ming and the northwestern borderlands. However, many tribute envoys resided in the interior regions of the Ming for extended periods. Their activities strengthened ties between the Ming and the Western Regions and fostered ethnic integration. Yet, their prolonged stay also led to violations of Ming laws and prohibitions, causing disruptions and harm to local governments, military personnel, and civilians. Over time, these envoys integrated into local society, serving as a vital bridge between the Western Regions and the Central Plains, exerting a unique influence on Ming society and culture.
文章引用:杨蓓. 明代西域贡使居留内地现象探析[J]. 历史学研究, 2025, 13(4): 301-307. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojhs.2025.134037

参考文献

[1] 张廷玉. 明史[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1974.
[2] 田澍. 明代河西走廊境内的西域贡使[J]. 中国边疆史地研究, 2001(3): 12-19, 115.
[3] 马建春, 唐静. 明代河西走廊归附西域人析探[J]. 暨南史学, 2024(1): 84-96.
[4] 余太山, 主编, 张文德, 著. 朝贡与入附: 明代西域人来华研究[M]. 兰州: 兰州大学出版社, 2013: 13-150.
[5] 余太山, 主编, 杨林坤, 著. 西风万里交河道: 明代西域丝绸之路上的使者和商旅研究[M]. 兰州: 兰州大学出版社, 2014: 66-234.
[6] 明太祖实录[M]. 台北: “中央”研究院历史语言研究所, 1962.
[7] 王琼言. 双溪杂记[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1985: 34.
[8] 明太宗实录[M]. 台北: “中央”研究院历史语言研究所, 1962.
[9] 明武宗实录[M]. 台北: “中央”研究院历史语言研究所, 1962.
[10] 明宣宗实录[M]. 台北: “中央”研究院历史语言研究所, 1962.
[11] 明英宗实录[M]. 台北: “中央”研究院历史语言研究所, 1962.
[12] 明孝宗实录[M]. 台北: “中央”研究院历史语言研究所, 1962.
[13] 严从简, 著, 余思黎, 点校. 殊域周咨录[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2000.
[14] 明宪宗实录[M]. 台北: “中央”研究院历史语言研究所, 1962: 198, 3801.
[15] 陈跃, 韩海梅. 明代哈密危机与嘉峪关开闭之争[J]. 安徽史学, 2021(2): 34-39.
[16] 明世宗实录[M]. 台北: “中央”研究院历史语言研究所, 1962.
[17] 申时行, 等, 修. 大明会典[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2002.
[18] (意)利玛窦, (比)金尼阁. 利玛窦中国札记[M]. 何高济, 等, 译. 北京: 中华书局, 2010.
[19] 何乔远. 名山藏[M]. 福州: 福建人民出版社, 2010: 3035.
[20] 明仁宗实录[M]. 台北: “中央”研究院历史语言研究所, 1962: 227.
[21] 李应魁, 著, 高启安, 邰惠莉, 点校. 肃镇华夷志[M]. 兰州: 甘肃人民出版社, 2006.
[22] 怀效锋, 点校. 大明律[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 1998: 120.
[23] 苟翰林. 明代西域经略——以《明史∙西域传》为中心[J]. 延安大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 37(3): 69-73.