刑事涉案财物的诉讼全流程检察数字化管理
Digital Management of Full-Process Prosecution of Criminal Property
摘要: 侦查阶段启动伊始,涉案财物便已进入诉讼视野并途径诉讼全程,如何规范其程序流转是刑事诉讼不可回避的问题之一。在侦查机关对涉案财物“滥用”“懒用”强制性措施、审判机关对涉案财物的裁判模糊、执行机关执行不力的现实状况下,在数字时代提出新的监督有效性要求的背景下,检察机关面临新的程序法命题:利用数字平台实施有效监督、助益对物之诉,帮助涉案财物进入合法诉讼进程并获得准确实体裁判。因此,在检察管理工作中可以搭建涉案财物数字化管理平台,整合相关涉案财物信息的收集必要性与收集难度两方面,将其分为必要信息与非必要信息两类,并在此基础上关注必要信息的更新与移送,及时排查可能的违法行为。据此,涉案财物数字管理平台或能成为使刑事涉案财物能够“封有所依”“罚得其所”“执行有力”的有力依托。
Abstract: At the beginning of the investigation phase, the property involved in the case entered the litigation field and ran through the entire litigation process. How to regulate the circulation of their procedures is one of the unavoidable issues in criminal litigation. Under the actual situation where the investigative agency “abuses” and “lazy use” of the property involved, the judicial agency’s judgment on the property involved is vague, and the execution agency fails to implement it effectively, and in the context of the new requirements for supervision effectiveness in the digital age, the procuratorate faces a new procedural legal proposition: using digital platforms to implement effective supervision and help the property involved in the case enter the legal litigation process and obtain accurate judgments. Therefore, in the procuratorial management work, a digital management platform for property involved can be built, and the necessity and difficulty of collecting related property information can be integrated, and it can be divided into two categories: necessary information and non-essential information. On this basis, pay attention to the update and transfer of necessary information, and promptly investigate possible illegal acts. Based on this, the digital management platform for property involved in the case may become a powerful support for the criminal property involved in the case to “seal”, “finish the subject” and “enforce the execution”.
文章引用:王海容. 刑事涉案财物的诉讼全流程检察数字化管理[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2025, 14(10): 92-100. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.1410873

参考文献

[1] 巩宸宇. 加快推进数字检察战略赋能法律监督促进和维护公平正义[N]. 检察日报, 2023-06-19(2).
[2] 张一献, 翟浩. 刑事涉案财物处置的司法困境与路径完善——以刑事裁判文书主文涉财产部分为视角[J]. 中国刑警学院学报, 2022(4): 28-36.
[3] 黄华生, 石军英. 批判与重构: 刑事涉案财物的概念界定[J]. 江西社会科学, 2022, 42(5): 151-159.
[4] 孔亚. 我国财产刑执行检察监督研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 桂林: 广西师范大学, 2022.
[5] 李长坤. 刑事涉案财物处理制度研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 华东政法大学, 2010.
[6] 陈恋. 财产刑执行检察监督机制研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(3): 85-94.
[7] 朱德宏. 论“数字检察”视野下财产刑执行检察监督[J]. 上海法学研究, 2022, 8(2): 240-260.
[8] 邹艺. 论对物强制性措施的功能异化和措施竞合[J]. 汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 39(9): 30-38, 94.
[9] 刘艾涛, 黄有湘. 涉案财物处置的行刑衔接[J]. 行政法学研究, 2021(1): 92-102.
[10] 许译文. 论强制性侦查措施检察监督的诉讼化改造——以《刑事诉讼法》第117条为重点的分析[J]. 法学论坛, 2023, 38(5): 150-160.
[11] 李奋飞. 刑事诉讼案外人异议制度的规范阐释与困境反思[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2021, 24(6): 45-56.