论“仅退款”规则中电商平台的法律地位与责任
On the Legal Status and Liability of E-Commerce Platforms in the “Refund Only” Rule
摘要: 电商平台推行的“仅退款”规则在提升售后服务效率的同时,因平台单方面行使集规则制定、争议裁判与资金执行于一体的“准司法权”,导致商家面临“货款两空”风险,平台权力扩张与商家财产权保障的冲突有待民法回应。本文基于《电子商务法》与《民法典》,分析指出该权力已超越自治范畴,演变为“准公共权力”。据此指出平台责任的法律基础:其一,平台违反《电子商务法》第35条对商家施加不合理限制或条件时,需承担违约及行政责任;其二,平台行使审核权存在重大过失构成侵权,应赔偿直接损失及合理维权费用。为制衡权力滥用,提出建议:实施程序性约束(强制听证、备案审查、司法保留扣款权)、建立分层过错认定标准(重大过失推定全责、探索惩罚性赔偿)、构建三级救济体系(内部独立复审、第三方专业仲裁、司法最终保障)。旨在为平衡平台自治与商家权益保护提供制度路径。
Abstract: E-commerce platforms’ implementation of “refund only” rule, while enhancing after-sales service efficiency, has led to merchants facing the risk of losing both goods and payments due to platforms unilaterally exercising “quasi-judicial power” that integrates rule-making, dispute adjudication, and fund execution. This expansion of platform authority and its conflict with merchant property rights protection urgently requires civil law intervention. Grounded in the “E-Commerce Law” and the “Civil Code”, this paper analyzes how such power has transcended autonomous boundaries and evolved into “quasi-public authority.” The legal foundations for platform liability are identified as follows: (1) When platforms violate Article 35 of the “E-Commerce Law” by imposing unreasonable restrictions on merchants, they bear contractual and administrative liabilities; (2) Platforms exercising review authority with gross negligence commit torts and must compensate for direct losses and reasonable legal expenses. To curb power abuse, three institutional countermeasures are proposed: implementing procedural constraints (mandatory hearings, filing reviews, judicial reservation of deduction rights), establishing a tiered fault determination standard (presuming full liability for gross negligence while exploring punitive damages), and constructing a three-level relief system (internal independent review, third-party professional arbitration, and judicial final safeguard). This framework aims to provide institutional pathways for balancing platform autonomy with merchant rights protection.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
梁栋. 电商平台“仅退款”条款的法律规制分析[J]. 中国品牌与防伪, 2025(5): 12-14.
|
|
[2]
|
周莉欣. 电商平台自治法律机制的构建[J]. 法商研究, 2024, 41(2): 106-123.
|
|
[3]
|
张博, 张婉莹. 用AI做“毁损图”申请“仅退款”, 是否涉嫌违法[N]. 法治日报, 2025-08-31(007).
|
|
[4]
|
孙颖. 平台协议规则的外部审查机制研究——以私权力规制为中心[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2025(5): 138-146.
|
|
[5]
|
马治国, 占妮. 数字社会背景下超级平台私权力的法律规制[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 23(2): 115-131.
|
|
[6]
|
郑佳宁. 电子商务平台经营者的民事责任规范进路[J]. 学术研究, 2024(9): 57-66.
|
|
[7]
|
李小草. 电商平台经营者角色演化及主体规范模式嬗变[J]. 现代法学, 2022, 44(5): 194-209.
|
|
[8]
|
王牧. 平台自治与外部监管的边界博弈与良性互动[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2025(2): 153-161.
|
|
[9]
|
叶益均. 论平台规则效力的司法审查框架[J]. 经贸法律评论, 2025(3): 136-158.
|
|
[10]
|
刘锦. 电商平台承担信息审查义务的困境与出路[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 44(5): 95-102.
|
|
[11]
|
周游. 契约抑或组织: 电商平台管治本原探寻[J]. 法学评论, 2025, 43(2): 155-166.
|
|
[12]
|
金善明. 电商平台自治规制体系的反思与重构——基于《电子商务法》第35条规定的分析[J]. 法商研究, 2021, 38(3): 41-52.
|
|
[13]
|
姚辉, 阙梓冰. 电商平台中的自治与法治——兼议平台治理中的司法态度[J]. 求是学刊, 2020, 47(4): 90-102.
|