健康促进行动提升居民健康素养水平的效果分析

Analysis of the Effect of Health Promotion Actions on Enhancing Residents’ Health Literacy Levels

摘要: 目的：全面分析健康促进行动的具体内容，探究该措施应用价值及在居民健康素养方面的影响。方法：本次研究中，经过严格筛选后确定350例我市居民作为参考对象，选取时间：2024年1月至2025年6月，在后续干预阶段，以上居民需要分为2组，指导原则为：随机数字表法，分组结果为：对照组、实验组，每组175名；其中，常规指导为对照组提供，健康促进行动为实验组提供，评估比较最终效果，具体内容有：居民健康素养水平、管理指标以及满意度情况。结果：(1) 居民健康素养水平中，具体包括：科学健康观、基本医疗素养、健康信息素养、慢性病防治素养、传染病防治素养、安全与急救素养，统计不同维度评分后，实验组更高，P < 0.05；(2) 关于健康知识掌握度、自我管理能力，相比对照组(82.09 ± 2.11分、82.58 ± 2.14分)，实验组居民(91.18 ± 1.66分、91.23 ± 1.57分)更高，P < 0.05；(3) 不同模式干预后，两组居民满意度进行统计，对照组为93.14% (163/175)，实验组为98.29% (172/175)，比较结果得出：实验组更高，P < 0.05。结论：健康促进行动的开展，对居民健康素养的保障性较好，与此同时，该项管理模式还能够较好地提高居民健康知识掌握度、自我管理能力，能够保障居民满意度水平，值得大力推广。

Abstract: Objective: To comprehensively analyze the specific content of health promotion actions, explore the application value of this measure and its impact on residents’ health literacy. Method: In this study, 350 residents of our city were selected as reference subjects after strict screening. The selection period was from January 2024 to June 2025. In the subsequent intervention stage, the above residents needed to be divided into 2 groups. The guiding principle was random number table method. The grouping results were control group and experimental group, with 175 people in each group. Among them, regular guidance was provided to the control group, while health promotion actions were provided to the experimental group. The final effects were evaluated and compared, with specific contents including: residents’ health literacy levels, management indicators, and satisfaction situations. Result: (1) In the level of residents’ health literacy, it specifically includes: scientific health concept, basic medical literacy, health information literacy, chronic disease prevention and control literacy, infectious disease prevention and control literacy, safety and first aid literacy. After statistically analyzing the scores of different dimensions, the experimental group had a higher level, P < 0.05; (2) Regarding the mastery of health knowledge and self-management ability, compared with the control group (82.09 ± 2.11 points, 82.58 ± 2.14 points), the residents of the experimental group (91.18 ± 1.66 points, 91.23 ± 1.57 points) were higher, P < 0.05; (3) After different intervention modes, the satisfaction rates of the two groups of residents were statistically analyzed. The satisfaction rate of the control group was 93.14% (163/175), and that of the experimental group was 98.29% (172/175). The comparison results showed that the satisfaction rate of the experimental group was higher, P < 0.05. Conclusion: The implementation of health promotion actions provides a good guarantee for residents’ health literacy. At the same time, this management model can also effectively enhance residents’ mastery of health knowledge and self-management ability, and ensure the level of residents’ satisfaction. It is worthy of vigorous promotion.