混合担保中担保人内部追偿权研究

Research on the Right of Internal Recovery among Guarantors in Mixed Guarantee

摘要: 混合担保中各担保人间是否享有追偿权一直存在较大争议，学术上逐渐形成了三种观点：肯定说、否定说和折中说。肯定说认为担保人内部享有追偿权。否定说认为不应支持担保人享有追偿权的主张。折中说吸收借鉴了肯定说与否定说的观点，认为第三人原则上无追偿权，例外情况下享有追偿权。《民法典担保制度司法解释》第13条以正面列举的方式明确了混合担保中各担保人间享有追偿权的情形，其实质确立了以无追偿权为原则，有追偿权为例外的体系。

Abstract: There has been a great controversy over whether the guarantors enjoy the right of recourse in mixed guarantees. Academically, three main viewpoints have gradually emerged: the affirmative theory, the negative theory, and the compromise theory. It is affirmed that the guarantor has a right of recourse internally. The negative argument is that the guarantor’s claim for recourse should not be supported. The compromise theory draws on the views of affirmative and negative theories, and holds that the third party has no right of recourse in principle, and enjoys the right of recourse under exceptional circumstances. Article 13 of the Judicial Interpretation of the Guarantee System of the Civil Code clarifies the circumstances under which each guarantor enjoys the right of recourse in a mixed guarantee by way of positive enumeration, and in essence establishes a system in which the principle of no right of recourse is the principle and the right of recourse is the exception.