专利拒绝许可行为的反垄断法规制
Antitrust Regulation of Patent Refusal to License
摘要: 专利拒绝许可是专利权行使的表现形式之一,可以有效帮助权利人保障创新回报、维护经营自主,但是当涉及到关键设施专利或经营者具有市场支配地位时,该行为可能抑制竞争并损害消费者福利,此时反垄断法的及时介入就显得十分必要。为增强法律适用的系统性与可预期性,有必要推动专利法与反垄断法在规范体系层面的有效衔接,构建协调的法律实施体系,有助于在保护创新的同时维护市场竞争秩序,实现知识产权制度的根本目标。
Abstract: Patent refusal to license is one of the manifestations of patent right exercise, which can effectively assist right holders in safeguarding returns on innovation and maintaining operational autonomy. However, when it involves patents on key facilities or where the operator holds a market dominance, such conduct may inhibit competition and harm consumer welfare. In such cases, timely intervention by antitrust law becomes necessary. To enhance the systematic nature and predictability of legal application, it is essential to promote effective coordination between patent law and antitrust law at the level of normative systems, thereby constructing a harmonious legal enforcement framework. This will help protect innovation while maintaining market competition order, achieving the fundamental objectives of the intellectual property system.
文章引用:王思鹏. 专利拒绝许可行为的反垄断法规制[J]. 法学, 2026, 14(2): 94-101. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2026.142049

参考文献

[1] 世界知识产权组织. 2024年世界知识产权指标[EB/OL]. 2024-11-07.
https://www.wipo.int/publications/zh/details.jsp?id=4759, 2025-01-19.
[2] 孙曼曼. 知识产权滥用垄断行为的界定[J]. 理论导刊, 2011(6): 99-101.
[3] 宁立志, 杨妮娜. 专利拒绝许可的反垄断法规制[J]. 郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 52(3): 15-21.
[4] 张武军, 张唯玮, 郭宁宁. 标准必要专利权人滥用市场支配地位的反垄断问题研究——以高通案为例[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(7): 131-137.
[5] 渠洋. 专利保护与反垄断: 双向奔赴, 方得始终[J]. 法人, 2024(12): 3.
[6] 赵威, 孙志凡. 关键设施理论下知识产权强制许可实施路径[J]. 经济问题, 2021(2): 29-36.
[7] 魏德. 反垄断法规制滥用标准必要专利权之反思[J]. 北方法学, 2020, 14(3): 149-160.
[8] 袁波. 标准必要专利权人市场支配地位的认定——兼议“推定说”和“认定说”之争[J]. 法学, 2017(3): 154-164.
[9] 郭壬癸. 标准必要专利禁令救济的法律边界: 本体、类型化及规范界定[J]. 荆楚法学, 2022(6): 89-99.
[10] 冯晓青. 知识产权行使的正当性考量: 知识产权滥用及其规制研究[J]. 知识产权, 2022(10): 3-38.
[11] 唐要家, 曹美玲. 专业研发企业拒绝许可的策略激励与竞争效应[J]. 财经论丛, 2018(12): 105-112.