短视频评论中合作原则的“违例”研究——以抖音为例
A Study on “Violations” of the Cooperative Principle in Short-Video Comments—A Case Study of Douyin
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2026.142172, PDF,   
作者: 王成杰:广西师范大学外国语学院,广西 桂林
关键词: 合作原则违例现象短视频评论Cooperative Principle Violation Phenomena Short-Video Comments
摘要: 随着短视频平台的兴起,评论区逐渐成为用户表达观点、交流感情与构建群体认同的重要空间。与传统面对面交流不同,网络平台评论区的语言交际方式呈现出鲜明的网络语用特征,其中大量的语言行为表面上“违背”了Grice提出的合作原则中的四项准则:数量、质量、关系与方式。本文基于语用学视角,选取抖音热门视频的评论为语料,通过归类分析与语境解读,探讨合作原则“违例”现象在评论区中的具体表现与语用功能。研究发现,用户通过“违例”实现调侃、幽默、引发共鸣、制造社交参与感等多重语用目的,这种“表违实合”交际策略不仅仅增加了评论区的表现力,也反映了在数字时代下语言表达的创新性。
Abstract: With the rise of short-video platforms, the comment section has gradually become an important space for users to express their opinions, exchange feelings and build group identity. Unlike traditional face-to-face communication, linguistic interaction in the comment sections of online platforms exhibits distinct features of internet pragmatics, where a large number of language practices appear to “violate” the four maxims of the Cooperative Principle proposed by Grice, namely Quantity, Quality, Relation, and Manner. From the pragmatic perspective, this article selects the comments of popular videos on Douyin as the corpus. Through classification analysis and context interpretation, it explores the specific manifestations and pragmatic functions of the “violation” phenomenon of the Cooperative Principle in the comment section. Research has found that users achieve multiple pragmatic purposes, including teasing, humor, evoking resonance, and creating a sense of social participation through “breaking the rules”. This strategy of “apparent violation but pragmatic cooperation” not only enhances the expressiveness of comment sections but also reflects the innovation of language expression in the digital age.
文章引用:王成杰. 短视频评论中合作原则的“违例”研究——以抖音为例[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(2): 528-535. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.142172

参考文献

[1] 俞东明, 主编. 什么是语用学[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2011.
[2] Grice, H.P. (1975) Logic and Conversation. In: Cole, P. and Morgan, J.L., Eds., Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, Academic Press, 41-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Gazadar, G. (1979) Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. Academic Press.
[4] Horn, L.R. (1984) Towards a New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-Based and R-Based Implicature. In: Schiffrin, D., Ed., Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, Georgetown University Press, 11-42.
[5] Leech, G.N. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. Longman.
[6] Kleifgen, J.A. (1990) Prekindergarten Children’s Second Discourse Learning. Discourse Processes, 13, 225-242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 马海兰. 语用学合作原则指导下的英语写作教学及其反馈[J]. 教学与管理理, 2015(21): 92-95.
[8] 张艳玲, 李佳芮. 语用学理论指导下的口语交际教学——以统编小学语文教材中口语交际为例[J]. 语文建设, 2021(18): 35-39.
[9] 董辉. 从语用学视角分析《傲慢与偏见》的人物对话[J]. 语文建设, 2013(17): 35-36.
[10] 金小梅. 权势语境中格赖斯的合作原则与小说角色塑造——以《雾都孤儿》会话为例[J]. 电影评介, 2018(6): 82-84.
[11] 张雨梦. 合作原则和礼貌原则视野下的会话分析——以《爱丽丝梦游仙境》为例[J]. 名作欣赏, 2024(6): 179-181.
[12] 徐锡华, 伍锋. 合作原则与商务翻译的四条基本准则[J]. 中国科技翻译, 2008(2): 22-25.
[13] 陆健. 礼貌原则在国际商务英语信函中的应用[J]. 中国商贸, 2011(36): 227-228.
[14] Thomas, J. (1995) Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Longman.
[15] 宋利华. 合作原则下的语言幽默研究[J]. 语文建设, 2016(20): 85-86.
[16] 牛会娟. 由合作原则探析《傲慢与偏见》的语言艺术[J]. 语文建设, 2017(20): 30-31.
[17] 王可. 从合作原则违反现象解读幽默讽刺的语言风格——以《傲慢与偏见》的人物会话为例[J]. 河南工学院学报, 2021, 29(4): 67-70.
[18] 胡浩文. 从《小妇人》中乔违反合作原则的话语分析看乔的成长[J]. 今古文创, 2024(33): 94-96.
[19] Taylor, S.H. and Chen, Y.A. (2024) The Lonely Algorithm Problem: The Relationship between Algorithmic Personalization and Social Connectedness on Tiktok. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29, zmae017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Elsayed, Y. and Hollingshead, A.B. (2022) Humor Reduces Online Incivility. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 27, zmac005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef