涉众型经济犯罪共犯退赔责任的重构——以作用力责任理论为中心
The Reconstruction of the Liability for Accomplice Compensation in Stakeholder Economic Crimes—Focusing on the Theory of Force Responsibility
摘要: 涉众型经济犯罪共犯退赔责任的认定存在立法模糊与司法混乱。本文以作用力责任理论为中心,重构共犯退赔规则。该理论主张共犯仅以其行为对团体获利的因果贡献(作用力)为限,按份承担退赔责任,构建“团体责任对象 + 个人按份主体”双层架构:责任基础以因果贡献度取代客观获利,责任对象涵盖团体亏损总额,承担方式坚持纯按份、不连带。通过“层级定位–数额对应–行为类型”三维认定标准及特殊情形处理规则,实现被害人保护与从犯权利保障的双重正义。
Abstract: There is legislative ambiguity and judicial confusion in the determination of liability for accomplice compensation in stakeholder economic crimes. This paper focuses on the theory of force liability and reconstructs the rules for complicity refund. This theory advocates that accomplices are only limited to the causal contribution (force) of their actions to the group’s profits, and bear the liability for compensation according to their shares, and construct a two-layer structure of “group responsibility object + individual subject according to share”: the responsibility basis is replaced by the causal contribution to objective profits, the responsibility object covers the total loss of the group, and the assumption method adheres to pure proportion and no joint and several. Through the three-dimensional identification standard of “hierarchical positioning-amount correspondence-behavior type” and the rules for handling special situations, the dual justice of victim protection and the protection of the rights of accomplices is realized.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
周光权. 共同犯罪人退赔责任的确定[J]. 比较法研究, 2024(5): 1-17.
|
|
[2]
|
梅传强, 欧明艳. 共同犯罪违法所得处理研究——以共同犯罪人之间是否负连带责任为焦点[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 36(1): 67-79.
|
|
[3]
|
肖新征. 被告人的退赔责任不因被害人放弃而免除——河南南阳中院判决陈启彬等盗窃案[N]. 人民法院报, 2015-08-06(06).
|
|
[4]
|
叶金强. 共同侵权的类型要素及法律效果[J]. 中国法学, 2010(1): 63-77.
|
|
[5]
|
廖月. 责令共犯退赔: 属性澄清与模式选择[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2025, 27(4): 89-102.
|
|
[6]
|
熊波. 论共犯违法所得处理的责任模式[J]. 政治与法律, 2024(7): 92-108.
|
|
[7]
|
李晓波, 范茗鸿. 论罗尔斯“正义二原则”的目的价值[J]. 太原理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 42(6): 88-95.
|
|
[8]
|
姚坤林, 郝绍彬. 刑事退赔后共犯间可行使民事追偿权[J]. 人民司法, 2020(14): 60-63.
|
|
[9]
|
李以游. 刑事诉讼中责令退赔问题的几点思考[J]. 河北法学, 2014, 32(11): 196-200.
|