隐喻推理的两大进路及优势互补
Two Approaches to Metaphor Inferencing and Their Complementarity
DOI: 10.12677/ML.2018.61003, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 冯 梅：西南医科大学，四川 泸州
关键词: 隐喻推理；语用观；认知观；隐喻糅合理论；优势互补；Metaphor Inferencing； Pragmatic View； Cognitive View； Hybrid Theory of Metaphor； Complementarity
摘要: 隐喻推理主要包括语用推理和认知推理。本文首先梳理隐喻推理的语用观和认知观，并简要评述各自的优点和缺点，继而介绍语用与认知互补视角下的隐喻糅合理论，该理论以词汇语义学和词汇语用学为出发点，糅合关联理论和概念隐喻理论详细分析了词汇隐喻义的在线理解过程，并运用概念合成理论揭示了句子隐喻性和词汇隐喻性的关系。文章指出，隐喻糅合理论结合语用和认知两大进路推理隐喻的做法可以实现二者优势互补，但仍有待进一步发展和完善。
Abstract: Metaphor inferencing embraces pragmatic inferencing and cognitive inferencing. First of all, this paper introduces the pragmatic view and cognitive view of metaphor inferencing respectively and gives a brief comment on their merits and demerits. Then it describes the Hybrid Theory of Metaphor (HTM) which adopts a complementary perspective of pragmatics and cognitive linguistics. This theory centers around lexical semantics and lexical pragmatics and presents carefully how to understand the metaphorical meaning of certain word(s) online by combining relevance theory and conceptual metaphor theory, and the relationship of sentential metaphoricity and lexical metaphoricity via conceptual blending theory. It is pointed out that although the combination of pragmatic approach with cognitive approach for metaphor inferencing can make up for each other’s disadvantages; HTM still requires further development and improvement.
文章引用：冯梅. 隐喻推理的两大进路及优势互补[J]. 现代语言学, 2018, 6(1): 14-24. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2018.61003

参考文献

[1] 樊玲, 周流溪. 认知语用推理框架中的转喻[J]. 外语学刊, 2015(2): 18-22.
[2] Grice, H.P. (1975) Logic and Conversation. In: Cole, P. and Morgan, J., Eds., Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts. Academic Press, New York, 41-58.
[3] Searle, J. (1979) Metaphor. In: Ortony, A., Ed., Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 83-111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell, Oxford.
[5] Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[6] 束定芳. 隐喻学研究[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2000.
[7] 束定芳. 隐喻与转喻研究[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2011.
[8] Cummings, L. (2005) Pragmatics: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Edinburgh University Press, Edin-burgh.
[9] Harnish, R.M. (1994) Basic Topics in the Philosophy of Language. Harvester Wheat Sheaf, New York.
[10] Tendahl, M. (2009) A Hybrid Theory of Metaphor: Relevance Theory and Cognitive Linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (2008a) A Deflationary Theory of Metaphor. In: Gibbs, R.W.Jr. Ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 84-105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (2008b) The Pragmatics of Metaphor. Foreign Language Research, 74-83.
[13] Carston, R. (1996) Enrichment and Loosening: Complementary Processes in Deriving the Proposition Expressed. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 8, 205-234.
[14] Carston, R. (2002) Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Blackwell, Oxford. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Wilson, D. (2011) Parallels and Differences in the Treatment of Metaphor in Relevance Theory and Cognitive Linguistics. Studia Linguistica Iniversitatis Iagelonicae Cracoviensis, 128, 195-213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Wilson, D. and Carston, R. (2006) Metaphor, Relevance and the “Emergent Property” Issue. Mind & Language, 21, 404-433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] 侯国金. 隐喻的本体论语用观[J]. 中国外语, 2013, 10(3): 53-58.
[18] Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999) Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books, New York.
[19] Lakoff, G. (2008) The Neural Theory of Metaphor. In: Gibbs, R.W.Jr. Ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 17-38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[20] Lakoff, G. (1993) The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In: Ortony, A. Ed., Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 202-251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] 胡壮麟. 认知隐喻学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2004.
[22] Lakoff, G. (1990) The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image-Schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 39-74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[23] Grady, J., Taub, S. and Morgan, P. (1996) Primitive and Compound Metaphors. In: Goldberg, A.E., Ed., Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. CSLI publications, Stanford, 177-187.
[24] Fauconnier, G. (1994) Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[25] Fauconnier, G. (1997) Mappings in the Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[26] Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (1998) Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science, 22, 133-187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[27] Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (2002) The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexity. Basic Books, New York.
[28] 汪少华. 隐喻推理机制的认知性透视[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2000(10): 14-17.
[29] 张立新. 隐喻认知语用研究[M]. 广州: 世界图书出版公司, 2014.
[30] Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J. and Pérez Hernández, L. (2003) Cognitive Operations and Pragmatic Implication. In: Panther, K.U. and Thornburg, L. Eds., Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing. Benjamins, Amsterdam, 23-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[31] 张辉, 蔡辉. 认知语言学与关联理论的互补性[J]. 外国语, 2005(3): 14-21.
[32] Gibbs, R.W.Jr. and Tendahl, M. (2006) Cognitive Effort and Effects in Metaphor Comprehension: Relevance Theory and Psycholinguistics. Mind & Language, 21, 379-403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[33] Gibbs, R.W.Jr. and Tendahl, M. (2011) Coupling of Metaphoric Cognition and Communication: A Reply to Deirdre Wilson. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8, 601-609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[34] Tendahl, M. and Gibbs, R.W.Jr. (2008) Complementary Perspectives on Metaphor: Cognitive Linguistics and Relevance Theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 1823-1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[35] Ricoeur, P. (1978) The Rule of Metaphor: The Creation of Meaning in Language. Translated by Robert Czerny, et al. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London & New York.