亲环境行为的社会认同模型及其在中国的适用性分析
The Social Identity Model of Pro-Environmental Action and Its Applicability Analysis in China
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2019.96122, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 李祺溦, 赵靓靓, 赵子豪, 王轶楠:北京师范大学心理学部,应用实验心理北京市重点实验室,心理学国家级实验教学示范中心(北京师范大学),北京;杨 盈:心理教育中心(浙江海洋大学),浙江 舟山
关键词: 亲环境行为社会认同干预措施Pro-Environmental Behavior Social Identity Interventions
摘要: 文章介绍了最新提出的从社会认同层面解释个体亲环境行为机制的模型,即基于社会认同的集体行动模型(SIMPEA)。该模型考虑了集体自我对环境评价和行为的影响,为解释中国文化背景下个体的亲环境行为提供了新视角,并为制定具有中国特色的干预措施和政策提供了新思路。文章在以上研究成果的基础上应用SIMPEA,提出针对中国的亲环境行为干预建议,并对未来的研究做出展望。
Abstract: The article introduces a social identity model of pro-environmental action (SIMPEA) which ex-plains the mechanism of individual pro-environment behavior from the perspective of social identity. SIMPEA considers the influence of collective self-definition on environmental assessment and behavioral response, which provides a new perspective for the interpretation of individual pro-environmental behavior in the context of Chinese culture and a new thinking for the formulation of intervention measures and policies with Chinese characteristics. According to SIMPEA, we propose the intervention suggestions on Chinese pro-environment behavior and make a prospect for future researches.
文章引用:李祺溦, 赵靓靓, 赵子豪, 杨盈, 王轶楠 (2019). 亲环境行为的社会认同模型及其在中国的适用性分析. 心理学进展, 9(6), 993-1001. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2019.96122

参考文献

[1] 费孝通(1998). 乡土中国, 生育制度. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[2] 郭利京, 赵瑾(2014). 非正式制度与农户亲环境行为——以农户秸秆处理行为为例. 中国人口•资源与环境, 24(11), 69-75.
[3] 黄梓航, 敬一鸣, 喻丰, 古若雷, 周欣悦, 张建新, 蔡华俭(2018). 个人主义上升, 集体主义式微?——全球文化变迁与民众心理变化. 心理科学进展, 26(11), 2068-2080.
[4] 刘宗华, 郑馨怡(2018). 绿色组织认同对大学生亲环境行为的影响: 绿色自我效能感和环境价值观的不同作用. 青少年学刊, No. 6, 3-11+24.
[5] 王建明, 吴龙昌(2015). 亲环境行为研究中情感的类别、维度及其作用机理. 心理科学进展, 23(12), 2153-2166.
[6] 杨文娇(2016). 空气污染情境中的群体情绪及行为倾向研究. 硕士学位论文, 北京: 北京林业大学.
[7] 杨自伟(2015). 华人集体主义再思考——差序格局规范下的集体主义认知与行为倾向. 中国人力资源开发, No. 9, 49-55.
[8] 佚名(2012). 民族文化价值观如何影响亲环境消费者行为. 新营销, No. 12.
[9] 游梦琪(2018). 环保激励对员工亲环境行为的影响机制研究. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 华中农业大学.
[10] 张庆鹏, 康凯(2016). 社会心理学视角下的亲环境行为探讨. 广州大学学报(社会科学版), 15(2), 28-38.
[11] Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The Handbook of Attitudes (pp. 173-221). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
[12] Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty Years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A New Meta-Analysis of Psycho-Social Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25.[CrossRef
[13] Barth, M., Masson, T., Fritsche, I., & Ziemer, C. T. (2018). Closing Ranks: Ingroup Norm Conformity as a Subtle Response to Threatening Climate Change. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 497-512.[CrossRef
[14] Brewer, M. B. (1991). The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.[CrossRef
[15] Chang, M. C., & Wu, C. C. (2015). The Effect of Message Framing on Pro-Environmental Behavior Intentions. British Food Journal, 117, 339-357.[CrossRef
[16] Chen, M. F. (2016). Impact of Fear Appeals on Pro-Environmental Behavior and Crucial Determinants. International Journal of Advertising, 35, 74-92.[CrossRef
[17] Ferguson, M. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Reynolds, K. J. (2011). The Effect of Intergroup Comparison on Willingness to Perform Sustainable Behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 275-281.[CrossRef
[18] Fielding, K. S., & Hornsey, M. J. (2016). A Social Identity Analysis of Climate Change and Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors: Insights and Opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 121.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Fielding, K. S., Terry, D. J., Masser, B. M., & Hogg, M. A. (2008). Integrating Social Identity Theory and the Theory of Planned Behaviour to Explain Decisions to Engage in Sustainable Agricultural Practices. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 23-48.[CrossRef
[20] Fritsche, I., Barth, M., Jugert, P., Masson, T., & Reese, G. (2017). A Social Identity Model of Pro-Environmental Action (SIMPEA). Psychological Review, 125, 245-269.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Fritsche, I., Cohrs, J. C., Kessler, T., & Bauer, J. (2012). Global Warming Is Breeding Social Conflict: The Subtle Impact of Climate Change Threat on Authoritarian Tendencies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 1-10.[CrossRef
[22] Gaertner, L., Iuzzini, J., Witt, M. G., & Oriña, M. M. (2006). Us without Them: Evidence for an Intragroup Origin of Positive In-Group Regard. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology, 90, 426-439.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. The Population Problem Has No Technical Solution; It Requires a Fundamental Extension in Morality. Science, 162, 1243-1248.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Jugert, P., Greenaway, K. H., Barth, M., Büchner, R., Eisentraut, S., & Fritsche, I. (2016). Collective Efficacy Increases Pro-Environmental Intentions through Increasing Self-Efficacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 12-23.[CrossRef
[25] Klöckner, C. A. (2013). A Comprehensive Model of the Psychology of Environmental Behaviour. A Meta-Analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1028-1038.[CrossRef
[26] Klöckner, C. A., & Blöbaum, A. (2010). A Comprehensive Action Determination Model: Toward a Broader Understanding of Ecological Behaviour Using the Example of Travel Mode Choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 574-586.[CrossRef
[27] Lede, E., & Meleady, R. (2019). Applying Social Influence Insights to Encourage Climate Resilient Domestic Water Behavior: Bridging the Theory-Practice Gap. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10, e562.[CrossRef
[28] Lee, Y. K., Kim, S., Kim, M. S., & Choi, J. G. (2014). Antecedents and Interrelationships of Three Types of Pro-Environmental Behavior. Journal of Business Research, 67, 2097-2105.[CrossRef
[29] Mallett, R. K., Harrison, P. R., & Melchiori, K. J. (2014). Guilt and Environmental Behavior.[CrossRef
[30] Masson, T., & Fritsche, I. (2014). Adherence to Climate Change-Related Ingroup Norms: Do Dimensions of Group Identification Matter? European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 455-465.[CrossRef
[31] McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2008). The Nature and Social Bases of Progressive Social Movement Ideology: Examining Public Opinion toward Social Movements. The Sociological Quarterly, 49, 825-848.[CrossRef
[32] Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative Social Influence Is Underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 913-923.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Rabinovich, A., Morton, T. A., Postmes, T., & Verplanken, B. (2012). Collective Self and Individual Choice: The Effects of Inter-Group Comparative Context on Environmental Values and Behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 551-569.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Haslam, S. A. (2010). The Social Identity Approach in Social Psychology. In M. S. Wetherell, & C. T. Mohanty (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Identities (pp. 45-62). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishing.[CrossRef
[35] Rosenmann, A., Reese, G., & Cameron, J. E. (2016). Social Identities in a Globalized World: Challenges and Opportunities for Collective Action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 202-221.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). The Relations between Natural and Civic Place Attachment and Pro-Environmental Behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 289-297.[CrossRef
[37] Schwartz, S. H., & Howard, J. A. (1981). A Normative Decision-Making Model of Altruism. In J. P. Rushton, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Altruism and Helping Behavior (pp. 189-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[38] Sörqvist, P., & Langeborg, L. (2019) .Why People Harm the Environment Although They Try to Treat It Well: An Evolutionary-Cognitive Perspective on Climate Compensation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 348.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Stollberg, J., Fritsche, I., & Bäcker, A. (2015). Striving for Group Agency: Threat to Personal Control Increases the Attractiveness of Agentic Groups. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 649.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Tajfel, H. (1982). Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.[CrossRef
[41] Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
[42] Talhelm, T., Zhang, X., Oishi, S., Shimin, C., Duan, D., Lan, X., & Kitayama, S. (2014). Large-Scale Psychological Differences within China Explained by Rice versus Wheat Agriculture. Science, 344, 603-608.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. (2016). Group Interaction as the Crucible of Social Identity Formation: A Glimpse at the Foundations of Social Identities for Collective Action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 137-151.[CrossRef
[44] Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2009). Aligning Identities, Emotions, and Beliefs to Create Commitment to Sustainable Social and Political Action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 194-218.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an Integrative Social Identity Model of Collective Action: A Quantitative Research Synthesis of Three Socio-Psychological Perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[46] van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., & Leach, C. W. (2010). Experimental Evidence for a Dual Pathway Model Analysis of Coping with the Climate Crisis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 339-346.[CrossRef
[47] Xiang, P., Zhang, H., Geng, L., Zhou, K., & Wu, Y. (2019). Individualist-Collectivist Differences in Climate Change Inaction: The Role of Perceived Intractability. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 187.[CrossRef] [PubMed]