廊坊市一次区域性暴雨过程的对流指数分析
Convection Index Analysis of a Regional Rainstorm in Langfang
DOI: 10.12677/CCRL.2019.84054, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 黄浩杰*, 郭立平, 沈 芳*:河北省廊坊市气象局,河北 廊坊
关键词: 暴雨对流指数参考价值Rainstorm Convection Index Reference Value
摘要: 利用MICAPS产品的中央气象台物理量格点数据、高空、地面等气象资料和双线性插值算法对2017年8月2日廊坊市一次区域性暴雨天气过程及其六种对流指数进行了深入分析,结果表明:本次区域暴雨过程中,造成南北部暴雨的影响系统明显不同,中北部暴雨的主要影响系统是短波槽,南部大城的大暴雨主要是登陆台风减弱后的低值系统影响。在南北暴雨产生的共同时段内,各对流指数显示南部强于中北部,对大城的大暴雨有较好的预报指示意义,北部的暴雨较南部弱,其对流指数的变化与降水的持续时间基本一致。对流指数的强弱程度、分布范围、发展变化与暴雨的强弱、分布范围、发生发展有较好的一致性,具有重要的参考价值。
Abstract: A regional rainstorm process and its six convective indices in Langfang City on August 2, 2017 were analyzed by using the physical quantity lattice data of the Central Meteorological Observatory of MICAPS products, meteorological data of high altitude and ground, and bilinear interpolation algorithm. The results show that during the rainstorm process in this region, the impact systems of the rainstorm in the north and the south are obviously different, and the main impact of the rainstorm in the north and central regions is different. The main impact system of heavy rain in the north central region is the shortwave trough, and the heavy rain in the southern metropolis is mainly affected by the low-value system after the landing typhoon weakens. During the common period of the rainstorm in the north and south, the convective indices show that the south is stronger than the middle and north, which has better forecasting significance for the heavy rain in the city. The rainstorm in the north is weaker than that in the south, and the change of the convec-tive indices is basically consistent with the duration of rainfall. The intensity, distribution range, development and change of convective index are in good agreement with the intensity, distribution range and occurrence and development of heavy rain, which has important reference value.
文章引用:黄浩杰, 郭立平, 沈芳. 廊坊市一次区域性暴雨过程的对流指数分析[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2019, 8(4): 494-502. https://doi.org/10.12677/CCRL.2019.84054

参考文献

[1] 刘玉玲. 对流参数在强对流天气潜势预测中的作用[J]. 气象科技, 2003, 31(3): 147-151.
[2] 黄庆国, 谭彦英, 罗思泽. 岑溪市“7.25”暴雨成因分析[J]. 气象研究与应用, 2009, 30(2): 11-15.
[3] 唐钱奎, 鲁燕, 黄先伦. “8.26”成都区域性短时暴雨天气过程的对流指数分析[J]. 成都信息工程学院学报, 2010, 25(5): 518-523.
[4] 王立荣, 王丽荣, 匡顺四, 郭卫红. 对流参数气候特征在短期预报中的应用[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2008, 24(5): 38-41.
[5] 李勇, 孔期. 2006年5-9月雷暴天气及各种物理量指数的统计分析[J]. 气象, 2009, 35(2): 64-70.
[6] 林立, 李荣, 张霞, 冯惠敏, 王兴红. 一次短时暴雨天气的稳定度和能量参数分析[J]. 气象与环境科学, 2007, 30(4): 45-48.
[7] 王盛繁, 陆洪波. 2012年“端午节”强降雨天气过程总结分析[J]. 气象研究与应用, 2012, 33(S2): 9-10.
[8] 韦春苗. 凤山县2014年“6∙4”强降雨过程分析[J]. 气象研究与应用, 2016, 37(S1): 28-30.
[9] 刘煜, 谭雪菲, 张娟娟. 宾阳县一次短时暴雨天气过程分析[J]. 气象研究与应用, 2009, 30(2): 46-49.
[10] Doswell, C.A., Brppls, H.E. and Maddox, R.A. (1996) Flash Flood Forecasting: An Ingredients-Based Methodology. Weather and Forecasting, 11, 560-581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 梁卫芳, 凌艺, 王厚广, 等. 青岛市8.26暴雨中的物理量特征分析[J]. 海洋预报, 2005, 22(1): 92-98.
[12] 廖晓农, 倪允琪, 何娜, 宋巧云. 导致721特大暴雨过程中水汽异常充沛的天气尺度动力过程分析研究[J]. 气象学报, 71(6): 997-1011.
[13] 赵培娟, 吴纂, 郑世林. 河南省强对流天气诊断分析预报系统[J]. 气象, 2010, 36(2): 33-38.
[14] 周后福, 邱明燕, 张爱民. 基于稳定度和能量指标作强对流天气的短时预报指标分析[J]. 高原气象, 2006, 25(4): 716-722.
[15] 陈晓红, 都莹, 周后福. 一次罕见冰雹天气过程的对流参数分析[J]. 气象科技, 2007, 27(3): 335-341.
[16] 付双喜, 何金梅. 甘肃短时强降水天气若干环境参数特征分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2015, 38(3): 469-477.