双源64排CT低剂量扫描在冠脉支架再狭窄中的临床应用
Clinical Application of Low-Dose Dual-Source 64-Slice CT in Coronary Stent Restenosis
摘要:
目的:探讨双源64排CT低剂量扫描在冠脉支架再狭窄中的临床应用。方法:回顾30例患者,支架置入的冠脉重度狭窄患者的临床资料。所有患者均行双源64排CT低剂量检查、冠状动脉造影检查,将二者比较,评估双源64排CT低剂量扫描对支架再狭窄诊断的阴性预测值、阳性预测值、敏感度及特异度。结果:30例研究对象共放支架72支,共36支支架诊断为再狭窄,包括轻度狭窄15支、中度狭窄15支、重度狭窄6支,对比冠脉造影,重度狭窄:准确率、阴性预测值、阳性预测值、敏感度及特异度分别为:97%、92%、94%、91%、95%。中度狭窄:准确率、阴性预测值、阳性预测值、敏感度及特异度分别为:95%、89%、86%、90%、91%。轻度狭窄:准确率、阴性预测值、阳性预测值、敏感度及特异度分别为:94%、85%、84%、87%、82%。结论:双源64排CT低剂量扫描能准确诊断冠状动脉支架再狭窄。
Abstract:
Objective: To investigate the clinical application of low-dose dual-source 64-slice CT in coronary stent restenosis. Methods: The clinical data of 30 patients with severe coronary stenosis after stent implantation were reviewed. All patients underwent low-dose dual-source 64-slice CT and coronary angiography. The negative predictive value, positive predictive value, sensitivity and specificity of low-dose dual-source 64-slice CT in the diagnosis of stent restenosis were evaluated. Results: Thirty-six stents were diagnosed as restenosis, including 15 mild stenosis, 15 moderate stenosis and 6 severe stenosis. Compared with coronary angiography, the accuracy, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, sensitivity and specificity of severe stenosis were 97%, 92%, 94%, 91% and 95%, respectively. Moderate stenosis: accuracy, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, sensitivity and specificity were 95%, 89%, 86%, 90%, 91%, respectively. Mild stenosis: accuracy, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, sensitivity and specificity were 94%, 85%, 84%, 87%, 82%, respectively. Conclusion: Low-dose dual-source 64-slice CT can accurately diagnose coronary stent restenosis.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
孙晓骥. 各型冠脉介入支架特点及再狭窄机制的研究进展[J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2019, 25(6): 18-19.
|
|
[2]
|
严立, 程琦. CCTA诊断冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的价值及再狭窄相关因素分析[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2019, 12(6): 646-649.
|
|
[3]
|
张劭彦. 64排螺旋CT冠脉造影与DSA冠脉造影评定冠心病PCI术后支架内再狭窄的对照研究[J]. 中国医学创新, 2019, 16(15): 106-109.
|
|
[4]
|
刘幼文, 刘强, 金光临, 罗剑峰, 艾淑智, 王凤山. 支架置入术治疗有心肌缺血症状心肌桥的疗效观察[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2004, 20(6): 332-334.
|
|
[5]
|
龚环, 杜江华, 谢超, 王云玲. 128层螺旋CT血管成像技术对冠脉疾病的诊断价值[J]. 新疆医学, 2018, 48(2): 194-196.
|
|
[6]
|
Zhi, J., Wang, F. and Gao, W.J. (2015) Body Mass Index and Repeat Revascularization after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis. The Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 31, 800-808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[7]
|
唐昊, 于淮, 涂应锋. 血管内超声和光学相干断层成像评估支架内再狭窄的研究进展[J]. 心血管病学进展, 2019, 40(3): 393-396.
|
|
[8]
|
管柳森, 殷文涛. 预防冠心病支架术后再狭窄中通心络的临床治疗观察[J]. 中国保健营养, 2019, 13(15): 96.
|
|
[9]
|
荣梅, 李彩辉, 闫建华, 赵启利, 李兆祥. 640层螺旋CT低剂量扫描技术结合低浓度对比剂在冠状动脉支架CTA中的应用[J]. 河北医药, 2019, 41(5): 645-649, 654.
|
|
[10]
|
余蒙蒙, 张佳胤, 李跃华. CCTA评价冠脉支架再狭窄及其分型的准确性[J]. 中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2016, 22(1): 27-32.
|
|
[11]
|
Wang, D., Deuse, T., et al. (2015) Local MicroRNA Modulation Using a Novel Anti-miR-21-Eluting Stent Effectively Prevents Experimental In-Stent Restenosis. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 35, 1945-1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[12]
|
贺敬红, 李健丁, 张瑞平, 等. 64层CT低剂量前门控轴面扫描在冠状动脉CTA的应用[J]. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志, 2016, 14(23): 2811-2814.
|