林黛玉逆境事件及其因应策略之探析——基于社会心理学的视角
The Analysis of Daiyu’s Adversitiesand Her Stress Coping Strategies—From the Perspective of Social Psychology
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2020.1011195, PDF,   
作者: 蔡韦龄*:阳光学院儿童发展与教育学院,福建 福州;铭传大学应用中国文学系,台湾 桃园;游秀云:铭传大学应用中国文学系,台湾 桃园
关键词: 林黛玉逆境因应策略社会心理学Lin Daiyu Adversity Coping Strategy Social Psychology
摘要: 对于黛玉心理学视角的研究,多集中于抑郁症、变态(异常)心理学、发展心理学中原生家庭亲子教育问题、人格心理学的悲剧性格成因等,研究的角度似乎缺少了以林黛玉本身作为主动应对对象的立场。本研究拟基于社会心理学的视角,尝试扒梳黛玉的逆境及其因应方式,更加立体全面地分析影响黛玉悲剧人生的动态因素。
Abstract: The studies of Daiyu from psychology perspective always focus on depression, abnormal psychology, tragedy character formation of personality psychology, parent-child education in primary families of developmental psychology and so on. However, there is no view from Lin Daiyu herself as an active object of response to her own life issues. Therefore, based on the social psychology perspective, the study tries to sort out the adversities and coping strategies of Daiyu, so that the dynamic factors influencing her tragic life can be analyzed comprehensively and thoroughly.
文章引用:蔡韦龄, 游秀云 (2020). 林黛玉逆境事件及其因应策略之探析——基于社会心理学的视角. 心理学进展, 10(11), 1676-1684. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2020.1011195

参考文献

[1] <清>曹雪芹(著); 高鹗(续著) (2018). 红楼梦. 台北: 联经出版社.
[2] 罗杰欢(2016). 林黛玉的人格特质分析. 职业教育, (7), 97.
[3] 王昆仑(太愚、松青) (2000). 红楼梦人物论(p. 187). 台北: 里仁书局.
[4] 王林丽(2004). 浅析黛玉的性格悲剧. 心理百花园, (10), 57-59.
[5] Beltman, S. Mansfield, C., & Price, A. (2011). Thriving Not Just Sur-viving: A Review of Research on Teacher Resilience. Educational Research Review, 6, 186-207.[CrossRef
[6] Erikson, E. (1968). Identity Youth and Crisis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
[7] Swanson, J. L., & Woitke, M. B. (1997). Theory into Practice in Career Assessment for Women: Assessment and Interventions Regarding Perceived Career Barriers. Journal of Career Assessment, 5, 443-462.[CrossRef
[8] Taylor, S. E., & Aspinwall, L. G. (1992). Modeling Cognitive Adaption: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Impact of Individual Differences and Coping on College Adjustment and Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 989-1003.[CrossRef