面孔生命性知觉的影响因素和加工机制
The Influential Factors and Processing Mechanism of Animacy Perception of Face
DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2021.104112, PDF,   
作者: 许 冰:广州大学教育学院,广东 广州
关键词: 面孔加工生命性知觉真实面孔人工面孔Face Processing Animacy Perception Real faces Artificial Faces
摘要: 面孔生命性知觉是指区分真实面孔和人工面孔的适应性能力。近年来,研究者利用行为学实验、事件相关电位技术和脑成像等方法考察面孔生命性知觉的影响因素和加工机制。眼睛及面部整体特征、面孔性别、面孔情绪和社交联结是主要影响因素。在加工机制上,真实面孔与人工面孔既有共同激活的区域,又有各自特异性的脑区。目前尚存的争议主要集中在面孔生命性知觉的产生阶段。未来研究可以结合时代背景对面孔生命性知觉的脑机制进行更多探索。
Abstract: The animacy perception of face refers to the adaptive ability to distinguish real faces from artifi-cial faces. In recent years, researchers have used behavioral experiments, event-related potential technology and brain imaging technology to investigate the influential factors and processing mechanism of animacy perception of face. Eye features and the whole features of face, face gender, face emotion and social connection were the main influential factors. In terms of processing mechanism, real face and artificial face have both commonly activated regions and specific brain regions. At present, the controversy mainly focused on the stage of animacy perception of face. Future research can explore the neural mechanism of animacy perception of face with the background of the times.
文章引用:许冰. 面孔生命性知觉的影响因素和加工机制[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2021, 10(4): 819-826. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2021.104112

参考文献

[1] Gelman, R. and Spelke, E.S. (1981) The Development of Thoughts about Animate and Inanimate Objects: Implications for Research in Social Cognition. In: Flavell, J.H. and Ross, L., Eds., The Development of Social Cognition in Children, Cam-bridge University Press, Cambridge, 43-66.
[2] Sha, L., Haxby, J.V., Abdi, H., Guntupalli, J.S., Oosterhof, N.N., Halchenko, Y.O. and Connolly, A.C. (2015) The Animacy Continuum in the Human Ventral Vision Pathway. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 665-678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Comrie, B. (1989) Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[4] Legerstee, M. (1992) A Review of the Animate-Inanimate Distinction in Infancy: Implications for Models of Social and Cognitive Knowing. Early Development and Parenting, 1, 59-67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Barrett, H.C., Todd, P.M., Miller, G.F. and Blythe, P.W. (2005) Accurate Judgments of Intention from Motion Cues Alone: A Cross-Cultural Study. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 313-331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Rakison, D.H. and Poulin-Dubois, D. (2001) Developmental Origin of the Animate-Inanimate Distinction. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 209-228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] 方富熹. 3-5岁儿童关于认知生物和非生物的实验研究[J]. 心理学报, 1985, 17(1): 64-72.
[8] Hodges, J.R., Graham, N. and Patterson, K. (1995) Charting the Progression in Semantic Dementia: Implications for the Organization of Semantic Memory. Memory, 3, 463-495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 杨格晴, 祁新越, 允寒琦, 杨春亮. 生命何以特殊? 生命性对记忆的影响及认知机制[J]. 心理学进展, 2020, 10(8): 1274-1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Joyce, C. and Rossion, B. (2005) The Face-Sensitive N170 and VPP Components Manifest the Same Brain Processes: The Effect of Reference Electrode Site. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 2613-2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Zhang, Y., Li, J., Wang, Z., Zhao, L., Wang, W. and Miao, D. (2018) Perceptual Expertise Impacts Preattentive Processing of Visual Simple Feature: A Visual Mismatch Negativity Study. Neuroreport, 29, 341-346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Jiang, Y., Costello, P. and He, S. (2007) Processing of Invisible Stimuli: Advantage of Upright Faces and Recognizable Words in Overcoming Interocular Suppression. Psychological Science, 18, 349-355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Lavie, N., Ro, T. and Russell, C. (2003) The Role of Perceptual Load in Processing Distractor Faces. Psychological Science, 14, 510-515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 王昊, 杨志刚. 面孔空想性错视及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(11): 56-64.
[15] 王玲, 王静梅, 王军利, 卢英俊. 卡通面孔与真实面孔识别的ERP比较研究[J]. 心理研究, 2012(5): 19-28.
[16] Balas, B. and Auen, A. (2019) Perceiving Animacy in Own- and Other-Species Faces. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Balas, B. and Pacella, J. (2017) Trustworthiness Perception Is Disrupted in Artificial Faces. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 240-248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] New, J., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (2007) Category-Specific Attention for Animals Reflects Ancestral Priorities, Not Expertise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 16598-16603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] 向敬兰. 生命性感知的研究述评[J]. 心理学进展, 2020, 10(11): 6.
[20] Loucks, J., Verrett, K. and Reise, B. (2020) Animates Engender Robust Memory Representations in Adults and Young Children. Cognition, 201, Article ID: 104284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Balas, B. and Koldewyn, K. (2013) Early Visual ERP Sensitivity to the Species and Animacy of Faces. Neuropsychologia, 51, 2876-2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Nihei, Y., Minami, T. and Nakauchi, S. (2018) Brain Activity Related to the Judgment of Face-Likeness: Correlation between EEG and Face-Like Evaluation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Wheatley, T., Weinberg, A., Looser, C., Moran, T. and Hajcak, G. (2011) Mind Perception: Real But Not Artificial Faces Sustain Neural Activity beyond the N170/VPP. PLoS ONE, 6, e17960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] 严世振. 面孔生命性知觉的神经机制[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 天津: 天津师范大学, 2019.
[25] Looser, C.E. and Wheatley, T. (2010) The Tipping Point of Animacy. How, When, and Where We Perceive Life in a Face. Psychological Science, 21, 1854-1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Balas, B. and Horski, J. (2012) You Can Take the Eyes out of the Doll, But.... Perception, 41, 361-364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Balas, B. (2013) Biological Sex Determines Whether Faces Look Real. Visual Cognition, 21, 766-788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Bowling, N.C. and Banissy, M.J. (2017) Emotion Expression Modulates Perception of Animacy from Faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 71, 83-95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Powers, K.E., Worsham, A.L., Freeman, J.B., Wheatley, T. and Hea-therton, T.F. (2014) Social Connection Modulates Perceptions of Animacy. Psychological Science, 25, 1943-1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E. and McCarthy, G. (1996) Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 551-565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Eimer, M. (2000) Event-Related Brain Potentials Distinguish Processing Stages Involved in Face Perception and Recognition. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 694-705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Rossion, B. and Jacques, C. (2008) Does Physical Interstimulus Variance Account for Early Electrophysiological Face Sensitive Responses in the Human Brain? Ten Lessons on the N170. Neuroimage, 39, 1959-1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Churches, O., Baron-Cohen, S. and Ring, H. (2009) Seeing Face-Like Objects: An Event-Related Potential Study. Neuroreport, 20, 1290-1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Caharel, S., Leleu, A., Bernard, C., Viggiano, M.P., Lalonde, R. and Rebai, M. (2013) Early Holistic Face-Like Processing of Arcimboldo Paintings in the Right Occipito-Temporal Cortex: Evidence from the N170 ERP Component. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 90, 157-164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Liu, T., Mu, S., He, H., Zhang, L., Fan, C., Ren, J., Zhang, M., He, W. and Luo, W. (2016) The N170 Component Is Sensitive to Face-Like Stimuli: A Study of Chinese Peking Opera Makeup. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 10, 535-541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] McCarthy, G., Puce, A., Gore, J.C. and Allison, T. (1997) Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 605-610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Gauthier, I., Behrmann, M. and Tarr, M.J. (1999) Can Face Recognition Really Be Dissociated from Object Recognition? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 349-370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Gobbini, M.I., Gentili, C., Ricciardi, E., Bellucci, C., Salvini, P., Laschi, C., Guazzelli, M. and Pietrini, P. (2011) Distinct Neural Systems Involved in Agency and Animacy Detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1911-1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Wiggett, A.J., Pritchard, I.C. and Downing, P.E. (2009) Animate and Inanimate Objects in Human Visual Cortex: Evidence for Task-Independent Category Effects. Neuropsychologia, 47, 3111-3117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Downing, P.E., Chan, A.W., Peelen, M.V., Dodds, C.M. and Kanwisher, N. (2006) Domain Specificity in Visual Cortex. Cereb Cortex, 16, 1453-1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Warrington, E.K. and Shallice, T. (1984) Category Specific Semantic Im-pairments. Brain, 107, 829-854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Mori, M. (1970) The Uncanny Valley. Energy, 7, 98-100.
[43] Wang, S., Lilienfeld, S.O. and Rochat, P. (2015) The Uncanny Valley: Existence and Explanations. Review of General Psychology, 19, 393-407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[44] Wang, S. and Rochat, P. (2017) Human Perception of Animacy in Light of the Uncanny Valley Phenomenon. Perception, 46, 1386-1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Katsyri, J., de Gelder, B. and Takala, T. (2019) Virtual Faces Evoke Only a Weak Uncanny Valley Effect: An Empirical Investigation with Controlled Virtual Face Images. Perception, 48, 968-991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[46] Wang, S., Cheong, Y.F., Dilks, D.D. and Rochat, P. (2020) The Uncanny Valley Phenomenon and the Temporal Dynamics of Face Animacy Perception. Perception, 49, 1069-1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[47] LaPointe, M.R., Cullen, R., Baltaretu, B., Campos, M., Michalski, N., Sri Satgunarajah, S., Cadieux, M.L., Pachai, M.V. and Shore, D.I. (2016) An Attentional Bias for LEGO(R) People Using a Change Detection Task: Are LEGO(R) People Animate? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 219-231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]